That's exactly my point. I think the better question is would someone rather pay $110 for the PCIE 3 Inland vs $160 for the PCIE 4 version. On one hand it's just $50. On the other hand it's 50%.
I love der8auer but to be fair he lives in europe and he's paying $275 for an SSD. The Inland drive linked above is $170. So at the end he says he would recommend a Samsung for $186. By this standard, it would make sense to get an Inland for $170.
I've been using a curved 43" Samsung TV as a monitor for a couple years now and it's the best decision I've ever made. At some point when a single card can run 4K at 120fps I'll step up to a 4k, 43" 120hz monitor but until then I'm pretty happy.
I thought Bulletstorm was People Can Fly. Didn't play Blue Shift. Homeworld remastered wasn't their game, it was a remaster, and it was buggy as shit for me.
I'm worried. Other than Borderlands, Gearbox has never made a good game. Randy Pitchford seems like he's going off the deep end. And this game is 3 or 4 years overdue so who knows if any of the people responsible for the first 2 games are even still at Gearbox.
Their are lots of comments that i hold deer that didn't have the most best grammar or spelling but there good comments. Some times some one just doesn't spell good but from one comment it's to early to judge them.
There's a super simple test for this. Take what the person said about a particular group and replace it with "black women" or "trans people" or whatever "victim group" you like. If the statement makes you uncomfortable, then the statement was probably inappropriate to start with.
Absolutely loved BL2 but I am worried about BL3. Between Randy singing that gamergate song and then Dragonpunk coming out recently saying Gearbox was getting political in hiring interviews.... Now I find out the game is using Unreal 4 (which I have yet to see be done right)... I'm definitely...
Everything that had a volatile year got hit going into the end of the year on tax loss selling. now it's up on rumors the china trade talks will be wrapping up soon.
This is already pretty well known. Micron will be weak first calendar half of this year with prices normalizing later in the year. Part of the inventory build was that Intel was having a CPU shortage which meant people couldn't build new computers at the rate they wanted to which let for DRAM...
I'm snipping a bit for brevity but the key parts are (emphasis mine):
...The cases cited by Google for its proposition that the phrase "otherwise objectionable" is broadly construed do not stretch the meaning of that phrase as far as Google argues.... Here, the ads at issue in myTriggers...
Not really. You said "Acting in bad faith ≠ not being neutral" and I'm saying "Acting in bad faith = not being neutral". That is literally the crux of the entire argument. There have been numerous cases which define the scope of what they are allowed to censor. You make the argument that...
Just for the record... in a different thread, we are comparing a legal expert and lawyer Ted Cruz with a writing major Elliot Harmon on who is properly interpreting the law. Kind of feels like your analogy for some reason.
Thank you for commingling 2 different posts of mine. You said I used an appeal to authority fallacy on a post in which I didn't so now you grab an older post and apply your statement to that. Classy.
(2) Civil liabilityNo provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held...
Appeal to Authority falacy is much closer to what you did than what I did. You stated "That's a myth, here:" and then linked an article hoping I would defer to the author's "expertise".
On the contrary, reread my post. I didn't say for you to believe either one. I didn't tell you what to...
Sooo... here's the bio of the author you quoted:
Elliot Harmon
ACTIVISM DIRECTOR
Elliot is the activism director at EFF. He advocates for free speech and the right to innovate online, with particular emphases on patents, copyright, open access, and Section 230.
Before coming to EFF, Elliot...
This will end up going to the supreme court but the question is whether Youtube meets safe harbour as "a neutral public forum" under 47 USC §230 or are they engaged in political speech (by censoring conservative speech) as protected by the 1st amendment.
So for example, your ISP is absolutely...
It's a much better system. If you are a conservative you'll be given strikes until you're banned. If you're a liberal you can do whatever you want including calling for people to get dox'd, no big deal.
What makes it better is it's easier to understand.