Search results

I want the HEDT that uses same arch generation as alderlake

blind delusion will never get destroyed. the fact that he brings up 5.2ghz already shows you he is delusional, or fanboi at it's max.

it does make pretty big difference especially when drive is filled up.

tbh i just re-did calculation and results are all over the place. because info i pull from are coming from notebookcheck and obviously they are testing different CPU within different laptop. I try to find the highest score of 25w test but for single threaded performance to ensure no power...

damn my experience is the opposite rofl. none of my SF drives died, even to this day its been 5-6 yrs already. on the other hand i have had samsung and sandisk the pro version dying after few yrs or having weird problems where can't delete files and force me to secure erase and hope of the...

actually, the 18% ipc is more so from avx2/512 workloads but there are still improvement nonetheless. I calculated rough IPC gain in CB 15 from icelake vs coffeelake to be around 7-8% which is decent. tigerlake will probably be another improvement around 8% im guesing, i have way less info on...

i thought you were talking about SSD.. https://www.ebay.com/itm/352811061855

optane all the way baby QLC gotta get us those 16 TB of SATA SSD or 8 TB of NVMe SSD with enough write speed out side of dram cache to be worth it. SATA: 450MB/s minimum, NVMe PCIe speed 2GB/s sequential write minimum.

they didnt test how much performance penalty comes from these mitigation inside the hardware..

ofcourse some laptop only has enough space for single sided m.2 ssd. 905p is double sided and it comes with heatsink thats how hot it runs. my laptop fits double sided SSD but its only for 2280 form not 22110 nor 30110 form factor. I had to get an extension and relocate it else where to get...

well you are on hard forum. if you dont like performance then you wouldn't be registered here with so many posts so i'll take that as a complement.

yep it is spec'ed to that and it'll work. i know because i have it in my laptop with an adapter.

it wont be exact and it wont be off much either. i'd say something along the lines of 10-20MB/s on sequential workloads at best when you're not doing anything except benchmark. 300MB/s would be WAY too much, it'd be crazy to think SSD has this kind of variation as it would get any manufacturer...

sounds like u got major problems

I am using m.2 in my laptop with an extension adapter. 905p M.2 version is just the same as other M.2 drives so it'll be within power spec.

just high performance isnt enough.. there are settings within the high performance profile you gotta change to get more out of it lol.

there might be even mesh changes, it's what im hoping for. but we all know intel cut prices by 50% and will do the bare minimum to reduce further cost. was hoping this 14nm+++ will set us a higher mesh frequency around 3600mhz minimum to maybe 4ghz.

i already answered in my earlier posts. do those changes and you'll get the performance boost. lots can make difference. nvme drivers, different OS, different window versions, cstate, pcie via chipset or CPU, chipset ASPM, RST LPM, write cache, cpu overclocking, windows power profile settings etc

which reviewer are you referring to? lots can make difference. nvme drivers, different OS, different window versions, cstate, pcie via chipset or CPU, chipset ASPM, RST LPM, write cache, cpu overclocking, windows power profile settings etc. if you want a decent guide on getting more...

whens the review for this?

pcper and tweaktown both did review for SSD on HEDT boards vs on z170 -z370 boards turns out consumer board is much more optimized, either because of chipset or purely because of CPU. tweaktown also did test of different window OS difference, server OS give best performance for storage in...

with the history of what has been shown, i just dont see how a 5ghz will be possible. maybe single core boost? going from zen to zen+ node claimed to have 15% improvement performance at same power, but thats in optimal frequency maybe in the 1.5-2ghz range. once a CPU hits 4ghz that 15% number...

the closest thing thats coming out would be dell xps 7390 with 4c8t icelake CPU damn i wanna buy one and try it out. anyone have any idea how much efficiency we see here at say 3.5 to 4ghz? can we expect maybe 20% going from 14nm+++ to 10nm+

7nm power efficiency for having 8 cores in laptop will benefit so much

probably more or will be close enough.

what is dubious? 32 cores so damn fast man. and that 18% IPC i wonder how much of it comes from avx512 which we will probably not use for another 10 yrs.

wow its kinda fresh to see juanrga defend intel like this. but we know the test is purposely compare to skylake due to avx512 reason, which boost IPC of sunny cove. imo with the list of things intel changed is no different from broadwell -> skylake. at best without avx512 and security patches...

yea man, this is the issue with laptop space that these OEMs and intel getting away with bs stunt yrs after yrs. for desktop, there would be outrage if a mobo OEM not to give out updated bios to support latest gen hardware assuming socket can be reused and meant to be upgradable from previous...

for those that are interested, should head over to notebookreview forum as they are kinda all of the laptop enthusiast gathered in one place. currently laptops uses 9900k that can somewhat cool them are alienware, clevo and the upcoming GT76 titan. alienware being TDP capped at 125% of 95w...

juanrga switching to AMD soon?

people hoping to see 5ghz zen2, thats a bit too optimistic imo. if zen 2 can do say 4.7ghz on all cores then i'd be extremely happy already, given that 4.7ghz will be for ALL cores, so 16 cores, 32 cores etc.. if temp allows it. for intel top SKU 28 cores to run at 4.7ghz what kind of cooling...

i dont think theres a laptop that supports it in terms of the right length. i had to get an adaptor to make it fit else where.

970 pro aside, 970 evo latency isnt that low. because it got dram for caching a lot of speed issues can be masked up. unless you directly test the TLC flash chip theres probably no way to know, which none of the benchmark software will be able to do that for you. imo the next thing they can...

im using it in a laptop btw so it can only go through chipset and not direct CPU lanes, but even so the performance is noticeably better than a 960/970 pro. actually best to take advantage of it is if your OS is loaded with files to load at start up, virus scan etc etc.

the performance is pretty much exactly the same as 905p U.2 version, cause i own both. both are also better than 900p cause i owned 900p as well, 905p in general (U.2 or m.2) are around 5-10% faster in terms both sequential and random read/write so it is a nice boost, im still hoping the...

thats probably when intel has 10nm finally. i dont plan to do that cause zen2 will have 64 cores for their wx chips for the same price intel will have it for only 20 cores

can you not revert the patch? the security flaws are most likely not going to impact consumers especially the issue has been around forever. also 905p is thorugh chipset, could get another maybe 8-10% if it's direct PCIe from CPU.

totally forgot about that, makes sense. heres 905p without patch with 8700k in laptop

his 4k random read/write seems rather slow.

https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Storage/Samsung-Enterprise-SSD-Roundup-883-DCT-983-DCT-983-ZET-Z-SSD-Tested/Samsung-983-ZE-0