Search results

this. i've been pretty happy with my samsung g7 , but after seeing a friend's oled, i'm just waiting for the next gen oleds coming this year.

from here: Avatar took 50-100 computer hours per frame to Render. That's 1,200-2,400 hours a second at 24 frames per second. no they try something like this in real time on pc. anyway, it's nice to compare the original avatar's cinema graphics with pc graphics today and see how far things went.

yeah. bought one in summer and i'm happy with it. they'll be in short supply until the 5090 comes, so nvidia can keep their price up.

i'd like to buy that monitor, glossy instead of awful matte and nice minimalist style, but then if i had to wait 1 year or so, others will offer improved monitors during this timeframe.

like a shark. to prevent a sudden price recession in the market what a bunch of bags.

lolz @ what other people vote.

same here. i'm on a g pro wireless, ordered a wired viper but had not even opened its box when the ultimate was released. so i'll sell the wired viper although the ultimate is a good bit more expensive. after a year with a g305 and a gpwl, i just don't feel like going back to wires, even paracord.

some people are more sensitive to such differences than others. i remember vividly how i connected my first 120 display, moved the mouse - on the windows desktop and the difference was so obvious to me that i said "wow" aloud, although i was alone. pair that with ulmb, as i found motion blur...

this. ebay gets filled quickly with last gen cards when the new gen shows up. i stick with the 2nd-best model because the ti model is a bit pricey for my taste, but it has worked well. 670, 770, 970, 1070 atm, so i plan buying a 2070 and get 1080ti+ performance out of it.

glossy, because i remember that picture very well. of course, matte would be the better option if i couldn't control sunlight, but i'm talking about my screen at home.

lol, best story ever regarding playing doom. i've also had visitors because of my dooming, but those were mostly angry neighbors.

;) i'm also enjoying my xb270hu. no dead pixels, blb barely noticeable. another world, coming from a benq xl2411z with modest colors and contrast. and finally ulmb too, so this beauty doesn't blur. sure the 271 and the asus look more modern, but frankly i don't look at the bezel, just at the...

cool. 120 hz ulmb is enabled with monitors manufactured april 2015 and later, from what i could find.

because you need a very beefy rig to make 4k halfway playable, and they sell you at least 2 980tis for this. if 60 fps is enough for you. 4k - not yet, imo

- Features a signature and mysterious base pattern with the illuminated LED light-in-motion on the chassis for ROG brand synergy LOL whatever, 120 hz is enough for me if combined with ULMB. keeping a corresponding frame rate at WQHD is the bigger challenge ATM. either this PG279Q or acer's...

do you have it already? how is it?

i'd like a 16:10 monitor with 120+ hz and ULMB, but have to settle with 16:9 as i don't see this becoming available.

they'r blurry in motion, even those that overclock to 120 hz. their image quality is however much better than a TN. at least that was my experience with those. practically, acer xb270hu and asus pg278q are the best choices at the moment.