Search results

Yup, definitely looked like some sort of photoshop.

Nice, I guess I meant to say more power hungry SFX designs, because as you say, they do have quite a few SFX designs but most of those were designed around relatively low wattage PSUs of the time. The Q17 is the only one that supports longer GPUs (270mm) but it fits an ATX PSU also so that...

I couldn't bother making a new thread, so I posted about the PE-750 in the Silverstone SX700-LPT thread. It's good to see more options in this area though. I wonder if this means Lian Li will have some SFX oriented cases coming out, I'm hoping for a compact MATX with that 750W PSU.

So I just saw this on Lian Li's site Lian-Li Global | PE-750 So there is a another 700W+ SFX-L in town.

Well it doesn't really work like that. It's more like you have a certain amount of overhead for each bird and pre dx12 putting them altogether as one object is x1 drawcalls, vs x3 drawcalls. but rigging the birds together like that doesn't really make sense and takes time for an artist to do...

I suspect this will benefit Devs more than gamers. There is a lot of tedious shit Devs need to do to reduce draw calls that probably won't be worth doing with the reduced drawcall overhead.

Oh stop with the BS, for ATX this is SFF. This is not the "Sub 19L Systems" forum.

The Fury X isn't all that longer either although it does have the AIO. It's all due to HBM not taking a bunch of pcb space.

Sure the fact that Nvidia gameworks is closed off from AMD optimization sucks. The fact is that Nvidia does a shitload of R&D for their different technologies and works with developers to integrate them providing tools, expertise etc... AMD hasn't really done much of that besides TressFX. So...

Might be difficult due to the rounded edges, and that vertical space seems to be used for clearance of SSD cage etc... Jonsbo's RM1 is pretty damn small for an ATX case, but again you run into their nutty lack of cooling.

They will factor in benefits, software licensing etc... Actual wages would be lower.

For me, a longer U3 (that can accept 10.5" cards without doing acrobatics) with a bit better cooling would be perfect. They sort of did this with the C3 but have the side vents in a useless spot and I prefer the rounded look of the U and UMX series anyway. Maybe they do another W series and get...

Yup, they have the bottom vented and filtered, why not have the holes to mount fans down there. They could easily make an ssd mount on the front of the case like they did for the C3, or an optional mount on the side like the U3. Their thermal configuration for the case looks pretty nutty too

I came across this case on Jonsbo's site the other day. Its roughly 24.5L which for mATX is okay but IMO looks beautiful. The PSU cooling situation has me wondering though... http://www.jonsbo.com/en/products_30.html

Yup, that's the full binary engine right there, for the source code you need to associate your Epic credentials with a github account. They also have a tab to have a signup for the Fortnite Alpha.

UDK =/= UE4

It's the write speeds that really suck for the parity spaces, the read speeds aren't too different from the mirrored spaces.

Consider you might have issues carrying on because of any sort of liquid cooling, be it loop or AIO.

The reason the UE4 subscription is better is because you can use whatever version you have subscribed at indefinitely, even if you cancel it. Whereas Cryengine stops working when your subscription is done.

A good compact matx case is the jonsbo u3/rosewill legacy u3, clocks in at 20 liters. http://www.jonsbo.com/en/products_18_2.html