Search results

What they just installed on your computer! :D

It idles at 86MB (or put another way, there are 86MB of processes that aren't the task python script).

I just mean that specifically on the Titan V, NVIDIA decided to disable one of the four HBM modules because it hurts their soul to give consumers fully functional hardware. On these WUs 16GB memory = zero errors, and 12GB memory = ~15-20% errors.

Yep, if only greedy NVIDIA hadn't disabled one of the memory chips. Thanks a lot NVIDIA...

That's definitely a good way to still have fun and focus on projects that you might not run otherwise.

Well, no work left now. Have fun DDOSers and Spoofers!

I'm running 4 tasks per, but it is on an older CPU that is definitely holding it back. I just tried to start up another VII on a newer CPU, but now they seem to be out of work. Just like old times!

So what is good at Einstein these days? I fired up my Radeon VIIs which only seemed to get GW work. They don't seem to be running well however it is too early to tell for sure.

WFeather is distinguishing himself!

Yes, many of the ECM work units can periodically use a lot of ram. The _ru in particular periodically use 4GB+ each!

Because of QRB, F@h rarely benefits from running multiple units. How does power consumption look during the "low PPD" events? I do agree with Holdolin's sentiment; after running F@h on Linux, it is really hard to go back to Windows, lol.

I second that nomination (y)

I can neither confirm nor deny that will happen.

I'd like to propose a rules amendment: WFeather - and only WFeather - is still eligible to be nommed for HDCOTM. He can't win of course, but he can be nommed and lose every month!

Yeah - bunkering is a no-go on F@h. The majority of your points are the QRB.

You know when you have to do something, even though you know its wrong, because you may have originally nommed that person. Yeah... Anyway, as an apology I updated one of my old memes to fit the occasion.

This is the best monthly nomming thread trash talk ... by two people who aren't eligible or aren't nommed!

Tell me about it ... with interest, that GPU he owes me is probably now a 4080 or 4090!

You can still send me chips though W.Feather :D

And we're off!

Yep - and any of you rocking Intel Arc or Apple M1/M2, note PG just added official support for both!

Yes, Cullen seemed to drop off for me too.

And now Cullen: Computer Clock Cores Clock*Cores Mem Chan Threads/Core MT Threads Avg Avg # Running hr/WU WU/day PPD 2P E5-2695V3 (L)** 2.7 28 75.6 8 1 14 27368 350324 2 7.60 6.31 184367 2P E5-2695V3 (L) 2.7 28 75.6 8 1 7 57461 391490 4 15.96 6.01...

Finally posting my performance numbers. First Woodall: Computer Clock Cores Clock*Cores Mem Chan Threads/Core MT Threads Avg Avg # Running hr/WU WU/day PPD 2P E5-2695V3 (L)** 2.7 28 75.6 8 1 14 25491 326641 2 7.08 6.78 184724 2P E5-2695V3 (L) 2.7 28 75.6 8 1...

Ah, the joys of low humidity and clear skies! I don't see that often over here LOL (Maryland).

Nice 'trudging' so far wareyore! Certainly putting up impressive numbers! I'll try to post my table this evening. These units are slow and with two projects (randomly assigned) it takes a little while to build a dataset.

Competition has started!

What is the power limit on the 5950x? If stock the 7950x can pull a ton more power, which could be a bigger factor.

Yep - definitely use multithreading. I would start with what you used for the last challenge and test out higher core counts to see if they scale. I just started testing unfortunately, so I can only confirm that they are LONG. LOL

pututu is certainly on the ball for spending bluestang's money (y)

Hmm, I wonder what power it was drawing. If at the full 450W not all that impressive - but I imagine properly power limited it is still very impressive.

These are definitely weird - but I think that makes them fun! I think the Xeon Phi may be the most efficient CPU I have. How often can you say that - a failed product from several years ago does great. Cache and memory limitations also made these a blast to tune - each architecture and...

It was perfect for me - just headed in to work a few minutes late. I know PG says they try to move them around throughout the day to help folks in different timezones/schedules.

Competition has started!!! (10 min ago)

Elapsed CPU Time Average Computer Clock Cores Clock*Cores Mem Chan Threads/Core MT Threads Avg Avg # Running hr/WU WU/day PPD Utilization % 2P E5-2695V3 (L) 2.7 28 75.6 8 1 14 9084 108330 2 2.52 19.02 114135 11.93 85% 2P E5-2695V3 (L)** 2.7 28...

Ok, that should be decent then. Just trying to make sure you weren't overwhelming the memory.

How many threads per unit are you running? I would've thought the E cores would still do ok, if it is scheduling intelligently.

Almost done with the Benchmarking - I just have to decide if I want to let 1T/unit finish (it runs so badly - I think the memory can't keep up), but most of the serious configurations are complete.

Initial results seem to indicate very good scaling up to higher core counts. I'll post them soon, but I'll likely be running most of my systems in the 4-10 thread range (it can vary a bit based on CPU arch) and I'll try to do a full scaling test with my 10980XE.

I can confirm these appear to be long units. I'm starting testing with 4T/unit, 1T/core, but it looks like I have a lot of testing to do this weekend :D