We're going to have an ASA in place regardless. The content filtering doesn't have to necessarily be bulletproof for what people can view, but it does need to protect us from liability in this age of the **AAs and their ilk. Any further thoughts on the layer 7 stuff is appreciated.
I'm going to have to put in some permanent public access wifi for 200-300 users. The concern is that we want to do some content filtering so as to keep people from pulling up pron, warez, or file sharing. I've heard good things about OpenDNS, and wanted to see how this option compared with more...
Yeah, I was a huge fan in the 2.7 days, but ever since my enthusiasm has waned, and things like the bad definition really put me off. We might yet use it because of cost though. Symantec is so high.
I still wish I had some good comparison pages for the corporate editions of the various AVs.
Thanks for the reply. Forefront Client Security is, I assume, the version you have? Does it require a SQL install? I've read that the new Forefront Endpoint beta does.
I've been an ESET disciple for years, managing ESET at my previous position. However I've come into a new environment that has Trend "Worry Free" Business Security, and am looking to replace it. With the hangups ESET has had lately, and the (imo) unimpressive-ness of v.3 and 4, I'm open to...
I think judgment matters. If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place. If you really need that kind of privacy, the reality is that search engines -- including Google -- do retain this information for some time and it's important...
Identity theft will get worse, not better. People that refuse to learn and adapt to simple guidelines will be taken advantage of and robbed. Make a choice. That or GTFO the internets.
I'd ask him about the 'new era of transparency in government' that he promised. Then I'd ask about everything else he promised but hasn't done. I'd conclude by asking him if this whole president thing is, in fact, harder than he thought.
Bush sucked too so don't start raging on me, lefties.
Then it's still not a problem, because the only cost to the company is that of mailing out a letter to people "letting them know they may be effected".
This "20%" is most likely of the type that is not capable of entertaining themselves and expects you to ceaselessly entertain them. Some people actually do have problems, but there's at least as many people with control/attention/self-esteem issues as there are with compulsory behavior.
I typed up a whole rant in response to this statement, but I'll spare you. Suffice it to say that some of us are wretchedly miserable, but out of sheer duty to family, we continue to go because we simply can't find any other way to provide for people.
The glorious thing about the internet is that no matter what goes 'pay', someone will again come along and do it for free. As a corollary to that, every site on the net is expendable. ;)