Im running it at 3500 bitrate. I've tried all different bitrates. What is weird is that when OBS is just open ( not streaming ) my games stutter. When I close OBS, the game runs smooth again. The framerate is still showing 100+ but the gameplay is choppy. I've tried 720p 30, 540p 30/60, NVENC...
So, currently I have a 6600K @ 4.6 ghz 16GB RAM and a Titan X (Maxwell) while gaming at 1440p and it just isn't enough to stream at the quality I'd like to stream without turning down the resolution and ingame settings. Whenever I start OBS( not even when I stream, just having the program...
It doesn't work that way. Review sites don't review cards based on just their strengths.. They take into account all resolutions to effectively rate the card. Fury X is marketed as a high end GPU, so it will get tested against other high end GPUs at it's price point. It would be misleading if...
Sooooo, am I good with a 2500k at 4.2.. Lol I'm not cheap to upgrade if it's really going to an issue.. But if my 2500k still has the legs to run with my Titan X, I want to get every last ounce out of it. And by the way, thanks for all the replies!
Ps: numerous threads on the web state that...
Is there any proof that a 2500k at 4.2 to 4.4 is any different than any of the current processors at the same speed when gaming? Not calling you a liar, but I've had more people tell me that it won't cause a bottleneck than those that say it does.. I usually like upgrading my CPU when I upgrade...
I've been told that my 2500k at 4.2ghz will in fact not bottleneck the Titan or bottleneck to the point where it warrants an upgrade. And I can go higher, i just chose 4.2 ghz. Also, the reason why my memory is 3x2GB is when I built this rig 2 years ago, I had no clue on how dual channel worked...
Title says it all.. I'm currently at 1080p 60hz and with the Titan X, I feel I need to upgrade my monitor. Question I have is, should I stay at 1080p and go gsync 144hz,or get the new Acer 1440p IPS gsync 144hz? I went to 1080p in the first place because I didnt want to upgrade as often with...
Hmm, with the new Titan X preview.. the 12GB is really enticing lol. For $1000, the card should last me awhile. I forgot the mention that I do have a 1440p Crossover monitor.. I just "downgraded" because the 680 was struggling and going 1080p was cheaper than buying a new video card at the time...
Ok, to keep this short, Im looking to upgrade my video card for 1080p gaming. I like to use AA when I can but it really isn't that important. What's important is 60fps solid. I have a huge pet peeve that if I can't play at max settings with 60 fps ( or High settings with 60 fps; since in most...
I won't make this long, but I'm a PC gamer at heart. Yes, I eventually buy each console because I can't live without Metal Gear and Halo. But I will say this, the Destiny beta ( not even the full game ) is the most time I spent on a console game since PSO on my Dreamcast so many years ago. I...
Well, I game at 1080p with a GTX 680 2GB. Needless to say, I'm running out of VRAM. It does sound kind of ridiculous to get a card just for a game and it's mods.. but it's the only game in the past 2 years I've actually continually played and I'm still having a good time revisiting it. I...
Ok, thanks for the replies. I was browsing google and some people said 4.2ghz wasn't enough... but as you can tell by my Limp Gawd status, I trust this site over any. Thanks again!
Will you ship APO ? It's pretty much like shipping to the US as it goes to a US hub and then to the military base from there. Shipping is usually cheaper as well. I'm interested in the gtx 680, been looking for a zotac 2gb to match my current one for months.
@evilsofa, for 1440p, a 780 or Ti isn't an option. Judging by benchmarks, the games on my backlog ( Crysis 2 and 3, Tomb Raider, Witcher 2) can't run max settings at 60 fps. Also, with future games, they won't be able to either. For 1080p, I think I can hold off until the 8 series for 1080p. My...
So, I bought a gtx 680 2gb around 2 years ago and with my 1080p monitor, I could destroy any game with max settings and a constant 60 fps. Then my friend told me about the Korean monitor craze and I bit into the hype and purchased one of the Crossover ones. The picture was beautiful and for the...
Title says it all.. Currently I'm gaming on a single 2GB GTX680 with a 2500k OC'd to 4.2ghz with a Crossover 27-q 2560x1440 monitor. With BF4, I have to lower my settings to a unacceptable level just to stay competitive and have a smooth 60fps at all times. My question is, should I upgrade to...
I dunno if there is another thread on this, if there, then lock this one up and I apologize.
After seeing video reviews of the current next gen launch titles and hearing they are running at 1080p on PS4 ( not that upscaled crap) and at 720p on XB1, these games look pretty good. The reason why...
But in certain points in the game, I do get 60 fps. If you read my post, I said it usually averages at 52-53 fps, but it also reaches 60 fps at certain parts of the map so I would say that my post is pretty accurate.
With my current setup, I get around 50-60 with ultra settings, no MSAA, and with HDAO. It usually averages at 52-53 with the occasional dip into the mid 40's. :( Not as smooth as I want it to be, since I'm used to every other game being smoother with solid 60fps. 680 GTX 2560x1440 here.
I wish vega lol, but naw, I've only had the 1440p for a lil bit, maybe a month and still browse and do other things on my 27in 1080p and it doesnt really bother me other than the colors sometimes, but people are constantly raving about the smoothness for 1st person shooters. :( I may try out...
Well, I have a Crossover 27q-p 1440p monitor that is great. I love the colors, the viewing angles, the glossy screen with no AG coating, and the additional pixels over my previous 1080p screen but I do miss the 80-100 fps with MSAA on that I got with my 680 and 1080p as well as 70+ FPS in...
Stock vs stock, id go with a 680 is you can afford it. If you absolutely want a 670, I'd get a premium one with a 680 PCB ( longer PCB) like everyone is saying. I tend to go for the best card on the market and at the time, it was the 680. Hell, if I were to do it again, I'd get a premium...
Wow... Smoothest BF3 experience I've had since I bought the game 3 months ago, runs at a constant 60fps with adaptive vsync and is smooth as hell. Also gained a few fps ( 4-5 on avg ) with physx on high and dx11 extreme..
See if someone will buy it for you? Find someone trustworthy and PayPal / amazon them the money, they buy it and ship it to you. Of course I'm guessing you would pay the shipping etc. that is, if you really want the card...
Yea, I almost pulled the trigger multiple times on the 690.. but for the games I play, an OC'd 680 lets me play max settings with little or no AA. I plan on doing an Ivy bridge overhaul build, even though I don't need to, I finally have the funds to spoil myself a lil bit :p
I don't see how two 670's are better value. For what, clocks? There are more factors when buying a video card than how fast it can go. The 690 is built better than any 670, uses better components, has a better cooling system ( against reference 670s) as far as I know, doesnt have the coil...
well, I returned my 670s and just plugged my 680 back and OC'd it a lil bit. Im getting 60 fps in BF3 MP with no MSAA, and I only play D3 and HoN so I dont really need all that power at 1440p. As for the witcher 2, I gave up on it. I only get around 40 fps with ultra and when I reduced it to...