You'd be suprised how many consol owners who have bought into the meme that their consol is a "supercomputer"...when it's more like a old, slow PC...both console have G70/R600 performance GPU's.
And it is not just in gaming.
NVIDIA's GPGPU platform and tools are lightyears ahead of AMD's..AMD need to realize that there is a lot more than the GPU itself to selling cards.
After what I read BC2 is two very diffrent beasts on the consoles(scaled down generic version) and then the PC(All sorts of added goodies).
Looks like the console people are getting the shaft this time for change :D
Just did a quick goole, seems you are right....and fun part...now the consolepalyers are the ones whining *LOL*
http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/30/293857.page
Damn I hate consoles and their stagnation of technology...I hope more developers follow DICE's lead and use the MAJOR...
Comprehension for the loose eh?
I never claimed succes...just that Larrabee still lives on...unlike your claim:
Even Wikipedia thinks you are wrong:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larrabee_(GPU)
Look how theere is lots af talk of GPGPU?
But we have no come full circle...so what is your...
I don't game "benchmarks", I play games...
And NVIDIA's driversupport and feature support is bugger than AMD's...hence why I as a gamer buy NVIDIA.
No need for "chuck pathces", since NVIDIA works close with developers (TWIMTBP) and more often that not we see AMD's hardware suffer from...
Pot, kettle, black...
When do you clue in that Larrabee just shifted market.
They same markedet NVIDIA is aiming for with "Fermi".
Hell, even slow-feet-dragging AMD is interested in that market.
Sorry if you "gamer-feathers" got ruffled by reality telling you that you are not the most...
Really, why do you disprove you own first sentence with you second sentence?
Lets try again:
Intel Cancels Larrabee Retail Products, Larrabee Project Lives On
Read the headline!
Larrabee Project Lives On
Larrabee Project Lives On
Larrabee Project Lives On
Got it now?
Hell, if you...
You are comparing G80 -> G92 to a normal mainstream GPU release now?
Holy crap, when will you stop?! :eek:
The 8800GT was an anomaly, you would have to go back to the GeForce4 to find a simmilar performance delta, but that still dosn't cut it...no dieshrink, no new PCB, different memorybus...
Then you have a hard future ahead of you.
Just like fixed pipelines is a thing of the past, GPGPU is the future...also in games.
And nice "Red Herring"...like you would have bought an Intel card.
But it's still funny to hear people whine over that "GPGPU is killing my FPS!!!111!!"
When the...
Here is a way better look at things than anything comming from the 3 FUD'sters rumour sites:
http://realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT120409180449
Those numbers line up just dandy:
http://www.hp.com/techservers/hpccn/hpccollaboration/ADCatalyst/downloads/accelerating_HPC_Using_GPU's.pdf
Why don't you piss off yourself and come back when you have more than FUD to post...
EDIT:
Here is my GT200 running CUDA N-body:
"Odly" it performs...
I'd rather use the comparision of a 4x4 offraod(CPU) to a GTR(CPU) race car.
They both excell at their task, and while the 4x4 migth be slower on a racetrack, it can still drive there...unlike the GTR car, which get stuck in terrain.
Much like a CPU can render graphics, but a GPU (for now)...
You are comparing a CPU cluster to GPGPU? :D
There are 98,928 CPU cores in Jaguar...how many GPU cores?
I guess that is what happens when you read to much PR and to little tech-info...
The "comprehension" by the majority of the market is that NIVIDA is the best.
You can argue semantic and play ostrich all you want....the facts don't change.
And with NVIDIA pushing TWIMTBP, PhysX ect I have no problem understanding why people think as the do...those things are why I have a...
You continue to thin HPC is unimportant, even if Intel and NVIDA are shaping hardware for it.
That AMD dosn't isn't surprising, just look at their head up rectum regarding physics.
That is boderline lie...please link to where Intel state "Highend" and not "mainstream" for Larrabee....I bet...
You should read better...fact of the matter is that NVIDIA has had 2/3 of the market share for a long time...ever since the NV40 NVIDIA has had a good marketlead...because AMD(then ATi) didn't give user a good enough inctment to cross over.
Then there was the blunder formerly known as...
http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/core-values-whats-next-for-nvidia/
A nice read, with a lot more insight than what comes from the FUD-sites people here seem to be so fond of using...
You talk like the burried the whole Larrabee thing...danm this thread is full of ignorance:
Intel Cancels Larrabee Retail Products, Larrabee Project Lives On
Read the headline :rolleyes:
My IGB works fine.
As for what I so...I am very planned.
Got training planned for +1 year now, I do stuff in my own 1 man corp (taxes go to ME)...primary goal now:
To get L4's with proper skills, so L4's can fund all my fun.
Using Demski's flawed pseudo-math is only something advocates of creationism (mis)uses:
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/stillbad.cfm
It's like with everything else from the creationistic camp:
PSEUDO-
Be it pseudo-science...or pseudo-math.
Like always: "Creationism is not the...
Bad math for the win eh?
Pick up a deck of cards.
Shuffle them and take of the top card again and again and lay it out in a row.
Now calculate the probability of you getting that exact line of cards.
Then you will relaise why Dembski's bad creationist math is useless....and debunked.