Search results

Yep, its the AP9212. I scored five of them around 2 years ago for under $300 bucks(total) and it was a steal at the time. UI is almost identical to that of the newer units as well. The reason I picked these up was that they had the NEMA-5-15p as opposed to the L5-15/20. You can score some nice...

disagree, capex is lower but opex will be 10 fold more with a computer + usb probe. Idd stick with the more expensive extremely lower power solution :)

heh, at work :D Olives at home.

Again, I think that you need to be far more clear with the requirements. If you are looking to simply forward ALL user traffic to a specific traffic filtering solution PBR or WCCP would get you that assuming that you control the interface that this user traffic will traverse(so you can place...

my boss goes on and on about how good the weathergoose is http://www.itwatchdogs.com/product-detail-weathergoose_ii-1.html we use these though for all our corp MDF and IDF's http://www.rackittechnology.com/shopping/solution.php?cID=806&panel=purchase does the job,

different iterations are in the network pics thread, this is the most recent. This supports a lab, full functional cisco phone system(cucm, unity, cups, ccx), mcast network over gre bgp tunnels with a few friends to share DNLA content, WLC for lwapps(local and hreap)

A router can VLAN? huh? You mean create sub-interfaces? PBR might have worked if you can base your policy to match a customer subnet that you own, but it doesn't sound like you want to do this as you say its based off specific traffic. If you are just looking for a solution to redirect traffic...

Dude, stop seeking peoples approval on these forums... You're not going to get it. If you want to buy it, buy it.... but I wouldn't expect anyone, except for dash(and only because he doesn't know anything about networking), to tell you to go for it. If you have the money, why not... waste it. At...

I feel like I should post, only because Im one of those people that do use a "huge modular switch" at home. Do I have lots of them, yes! Did I pay for any of them, not a one! and thats probably my only reason Im using one of them for my home network(the 4500). With that said, heres how I see...

Ofcouse you're going to need to implement IDF's, this wasn't my point. Again, not my the point I was trying to make. My point was that it looks like you have cabinets for these switches, which are expensive, and it looks like you only appear to be mounting 5 switches and some patch panels...

22 cabinets that are similar to that? pretty wasteful, someone needs to learn the proper dynamics of airflow and hot/cold isle. Perhaps this is why you have all the siemon boxes stuff in between the 3750s? Still, having 22 racks to house less than 10 switches per rack is retarded, but hey...

Not bad bro, funny how people get all crazy over a bit of gear over here..... Im going to agree with Vito too, shoulda went nexus :D

Nice 5508's, Ive got them in my new corporate build.. my 4402-25's aint cutting it anymore. Its a shame I work for such a smaller company now, I can't even sneak pics... some have been lucky enough to see the datacenter pics though.... 220 or so racks in our US DC, another 60 or so in the UK...

non XM models should take roughly around the same time depending on the code.

CPU is a slow, memory is slow. Its an old platform. What do you expect?

Not learning from books? You're not going to go very far. Get a book(start CCNA:V, then get the CCVP books) and start with dynamips, CME and IP communicator then move on to physical hardware. Once you learn CME move on to CUCM..... but a warning.. the majority of people here that have gone from...

completely normal for this platform, those numbers should be changing at a normal interval.

You should, they're very nice and fairly straight-forward. Their GUI is a breeze though I generally use the CLI. Its nice that their demo license doesn't expire on VPX for a year also. and you better never forget it! Do I get a new title for such an accomplishment :D

my netscalers eat f5's for brefast.

um.... actually ive ordered 3 in the past few months, one of which is dual stacked :rolleyes:. Im fairly certain that I said TDM was cost effective, not the most cost effective and especially when compared to metro-e. Thanks for playing chief. You're one of those people that think metro-e is...

Its all relative, for an enterprise its not the kiddie pool and the majority of offices will have something similar(MLPPP). If we're talking a carrier network, of course its the kiddie pool...We have 500 people in this office(60% of which are females in their early 20's) and one DS3 rarely gets...

Since when is DS3 old school? The majority of ethernet handoffs to customers are bundeled DS3's and provided via circuit emulation to corporate offices.T-CXR is still an extremely cost effective solution, though there are other downsides to it, but its far from old school. If we're talking...

C2950 - cheap as hell Matts second option is how 98% of the industry does this for IDS, the other 2% are old timers that still like to use taps. Taps are gay. It is officially supported and needed if you want to do IPS, but it doesn't sound like you want to do that. Stick with SPANing the ports...

Magic of course!

This thread is as funny as that article, easily able to saturate a 1Gbps circuit eh? Hope you have your multi-thousand dollar router available to sustain that much imix traffic. I think the appropriate response for everyone on this forum(including myself) would be , "hitting no more than 600Mbps...

2T was a huge step forward, but some of the older technologies will keep the 6500's firmly in the enterprise/campus core(vss for one). Being able to terminate other transport technologies other than Ethernet(SONET, TDM, HSSI, LSSI) gives the 6500 the edge in the enterprise so thats why I dont...

Just another vanilla switch(at least it should be), high speed fabric for the datacenter. I disagree with Vito regarding the replacement of the 6500 as they are completely different platforms that support different customer requirements. This was the huge "talk" when the nexus was released years...

be prepared to cream your pants sure, it was like 7 years ago but whoa! Good stuff here!

Nope, 99% of the people on these forums would just look at it and be like "wtf" and then 2 posts later when someone posts pictures of a pix 515e they're creaming their pants..... ive posted pictures of ASR9k's(months before it was released), nexus 7k's, 15454 MSPP's, 7600's/6500's and thats...

Never a fan of director of IT, seems like too much managment at that point. Director: Network Operations/Global Networks(if you're global) Manager titles are bullshit, I have one in my group and everyone reports to the director of our group.

hahaha, didn't even notice I typed F1(been working on too much fabricpath!). You are going to run that in dedicated mode? Again, be weary of your member links on the same LC in the chassis.. WE HAVE HAD PROBLEMS w/ the M1 cards and 5.1.x so you kinda dont want to put all your eggs into one...

single sup, single F1-32 LC and single 48 port.... I guess you're relying on HSRP for horizontal failover? Scary stuff man, you gotta get some redundancy on those 7010's(especially for ISSU).... idd never let my 18's have one sup and single LC's :p the 5548's are nice though, great for agg...

Just stuff I have laying around(2650xm's mostly). I stopped powering on real routers like 6 years ago :p CCIE stuff is all dynamips 32 bit host :( ... the new host I just added is 64bit but didn't get around to installing esx. All my hosts in my townhouse are [email protected] though :D

little cabling update, added another server for the eventual fileserver replacement and another ESX host. Replaced the old 3524PWR for a 3550 and 2970G. Got remote power all setup finally. have another rack and a half worth of gear not here(parents house).

Looks like he re-terminated them with compression fittings, good call on that one :D(i always use them). Looks worlds better without the canned media install(love the demarc look), seems like all new townhome/condo complexes are doing this these days.

1. I didn't see that IGMP in your OP, so if its already been verified then great. Though even if it wasn't turned on i HIGHLY doubt you would see any performance impact with only 5 PCs. 2. I said its stupid only becuase the assumption that Ghost is adhearing to the original standard of ONLY...

lol, guy. Listen. What I was trying to covey was that you need to better understand the application that you're working with, and not resort to calling it a network issue just becuase you see an increase in the time it takes to deliver your images. How do you do this? 1. Verify that it is...

Its not that we dont have a clue, it's we generally know how to do IT's job better and understand how the technology works. We're not mine sweeper experts like 99.999% of IT guys are. Feel free to use "multicast" though to get images to your laptops(again, I doubt that its doing this anyways...

been running a tunnel through HE broker since its inception. Deployed 6PE for a large ISP in the past. Working on deploying right now with an advertising company. Idd hop on the bandwagon soon, IPv4 addresses are all accounted for as of a month ago and still 90% of network engineers today are...

What are you doing is stupid, plain and simple. 1. Multicast inherently is a un-reliable delivery mechanism since it ONLY supports UDP. You can use it reliably but im not sure that you are, but that would be at the application level and its no longer considered a single stream multicast...