I ran straight through the first village in W3 yesterday and it looked like it was more in the mid-70s for me (granted I've not played the game at all so no idea how it performs in combat, etc.). This was on Ultra with hairworks off and in-game AA off. I'm using ReShade to inject SMAA rather...
I tried Witcher 3 a few days ago on Ultra, but can't remember now, I can check later today (I'm just at the beginning, I was waiting to upgrade to play it), but I do remember it was very noticeably smoother than with my 980 non-Ti - I wanna say it was mid-60s but don't hold me to that until I...
I have no idea how it performs with Prey, but at least this one seems - note seems - to have resolved the issue with the garbled red line and black screen at cold boot that was happening every other boot on the previous driver.
I swear, Creators Update on W10 has been a bit of a mess on the...
Seeing as how the Liquid Freezer 240 is touted as an option, it would be interesting how it compared to the X52 in the performance tests in ONLY a two fan push or a two fan pull rather than push/pull. Particularly for those of us that don't have the room in our cases for the full push/pull...
Yeah, not showing any issues bumping it up to +60. Haven't gone any further yet. I don't tend to overclock my GPUs anyway so will likely let it live there for a while.
My Gaming X is only hitting a boost of about 1900 out of the box when playing Witcher 3 in 3440x1440 if the CAM performance overlay is to be believed (for some reason Afterburner and Riva's overlay has stopped working for me, need to work on that). This seems lower than some people's...
This benchmark seems really buggy to me. All the 16:9 resolutions automatically stretch (or are rendering?) across my entire ultrawide monitor (3440x1440), and when I try to pick the actuala 3440x1440 resolution the screen goes red and I have to ctl+alt+del out of it and it apologizes for...
Well, Amazon didn't ship my Gaming X yesterday, but it's in "Preparing Shipment" and still says it will arrive Tuesday, so we'll see. I hope that holds, I'm anxious to see how Baldur's Gate 2: EE performs with it.
The specs say it can take a 120mm fan on the bottom, not sure where though since I don't have it yet. I'm not sure how much more that would help since you already have 2x 140mm in the front though. I'll be moving from a Silverstone FT-02 so it will be quite a bit smaller and I'm certainly not...
If you have the Define C you can add a number of fans that don't come default, including to the top and bottom which may help (I think I'll replace the front with a 140mm fan as well). That's the case I'm planning to transfer my system to with the 1080Ti so it's good to hear your experience with it.
That's an RVZ02, right? I have the same case and was wondering if the Gaming X would be too wide for it or not. Good to know it fits though. What kind of clearance are we talking about for the fans up against the vent? I leave my filters on, so I'm assuming that wouldn't cause a problem?
Sounds like I'd still be better off going with MSI, the Gaming X has treated me well on the 980 (though I haven't use a 980 Ti). I'm right at the limit of the recommended PSU though since it's (initially) going in a m-itx build using a 600W Corsair SF600 PSU.
Is the FE card using a cooling solution specifically for the 1080 Ti? I'm wondering if the partner cards may end up being louder since the initial releases all seem to be reusing 1080 cooling solutions without any tweaks while the Ti is higher TDP.
I did try sfc /scannow, but it finishes and reports there were some files it couldn't repair or replace and to examine the log file for details. The log file is so dense I think it would be faster to wipe and reinstall than read through it, haha!!
I've tried any number of tutorials and potential fixes, but still about four or five Windows Updates always seem to fail, including the one that includes the update and one back in the KB29xxxx range. The KB29xxxx seems to prevent a number of others from updating as well. I knew this was an...
I love how the twitter account suggested someone experiencing problems with stuttering on a 970 install Geforce Experience to get "optimizations." This nonsense is pathetic.
More like Nvidia is trying to get a piece of decent sounding PR out in the press by using average measurements rather than revealing instantaneous frametimes that would actually reveal the tearing and jutter that results from the 970's memory setup.
I posted this on the official Nvidia forum as well, but I thought I'd inquire about it here too.
I've been using DSR perfectly fine over HDMI through my AV Receiver and to my HDTV up until I replaced my 680 with a 980 and upgraded from 344.48 to the latest driver, 347.09.
At first I thought it...
Judging by MSI's own "compare" feature between the two 970s, the main difference is the base clock and boost clock defaults:
4GD5T (reference clocks? I can't remember):
1102 Base
1241 Boost
Gaming 4G:
OC Mode: 1140 Base, 1279 Boost
Gaming Mode: 1114 Base, 1253 Boost
Silent Mode: 1051 Base...
Yeah, I'm on the latest BIOS (as of two weeks ago anyway, haven't checked lately), and I had to manually adjust the vcore even on that (it wasn't awful on the latest BIOS, but I was able to get a good deal of temp headroom under load by adjusting the offset).
I've done that, that's why I'm saying K OC isn't the same as "enhanced boost", because that setting does not change that behavior with less than fully loaded cores and boost behavior.
I've had no trouble using Q-Flash on my Gigabyte motherboard and that seems like it at least should be more reliable than @BIOS, that I used on a board that didn't support Q-Flash a while back and I was being lazy. Flashing a BIOS from Windows just always feels wrong.
Nope, nothing with "enhanced" in it, and XMP settings aren't even enabled in the BIOS since my RAM doesn't have XMP (it's older G.Skill 1333MHz RAM from like four years ago).
I still haven't found a global "all cores" option in the BIOS (K-OC is not it, or at least it didn't cause any change in my rig's behavior). I guess the only way to do it is to set all the Turbo Boost ratios manually and try from there.
Hmm, actually that's not what happens with mine. If I start only two threads in Prime95 all the cores still go to 4.4GHz, it doesn't seem to selectively boost cores at all.
Is there a problem with using enhanced turbo so long as temperatures are ok?
Actually, I can't find any reference to Enhanced Turbo in the manual (not at home to pick around in the BIOS). Maybe it's the "K OC" setting? But some googling tells me that just is useful for non-k processors...
Aw, completely missed enhanced turbo. Thanks for that.
I've reloaded optimized defaults a few times on the BIOS so that doesn't really help, it still behaves the same with the voltage. However, I haven't experienced runaway vcore while running Prime95 using offset voltage, it seems very well...
I THINK this is a motherboard thing, so I'm putting it here, but it may be a CPU thing, so I apologize if this is the wrong forum.
In any case I am thoroughly confused by how my 4790k is behaving on this motherboard on two fronts. First, the vcore, and second the clock boost, so I'm...
We're discussing a Gigabyte motherboard so I'm not sure what you're talking about. The drives on the CD and on the Gigabyte website are nothing but the Intel INF update package anyway . . . which isn't solving there problem.
I don't have anywhere to post it myself, but here's the link to the post on tweaktown with the link to the driver.
http://forums.tweaktown.com/asrock/57722-sm-bus-controller.html#post483604
Next time I install windows what I might try is waiting to install all the chipset drivers AFTER I...