Search results

No. Screen tearing happens when the screen can't handle what it receives.

I'm not sure I'm following you but yeah, even though the latest IPS monitors are getting there, TN are still faster. There are no 120Hz IPS monitors. So if that's what you want, TN is your only option. My opinion is that, for gaming, you definitely should go with a 120Hz, but others prefer...

What's sad? That it's not an IPS?

V-sync invariably introduces input lag, but it fixes screen tearing. However, with a 120Hz running in 2D, you can leave v-sync off and since you will rarely, if ever, go above 120fps, be free of screen tearing.

It's a TN. There are no 120Hz IPS. Input lag and ghosting is for all intent and purposes, non-existent.

No there won't be any conflict. I can't answer that last one as I've never gamed on a tri-monitor setup. I sure like my 120Hz, though. What kind of video cards do you have? Edit: Never mind. I re-read your op. Dual 580s should be peachy!

You will be fine with another 1080p. Your 120Hz is wasted, though. From what I've seen, you have to run all monitors at the same res and refresh rate.

NO! I DON'T SEE IN 3D! OKAY!? YOU JUST HAD TO RUB IT IN HUH! :p My girlfriend said it worked well, though. She usually tells the truth.

Best of both worlds! Like I said, I have a HP IPS panel at work, and well, also an iPad at home. While I won't argue that it has advantages over TN panels, I think a lot of people blow these advantages way, way out of proportion. But then again, you could probably say that about me and 120Hz :D

My friend, nobody here has experience with all these monitors. Nobody. If you want an objective answer you'll have to google reviews. Most people in forums will root for what they own/know. Me, for instance, will tell you that the Samsung S27A950D is ZOMG TEH AWESOME ONE TWENTY...

I have the Samsung S27A950D and I don't feel like I'm sacrificing anything. It's 27", 120Hz and the colors are far, far from dull. Especially with dynamic contrast turned on for gaming. It's something else. I also have a Dell 2407 PVA, and a HP LP2475 IPS at work. Both 24" 1920x1200. I'm a...

That's mah boy! I've had mine only for a few days but try this when you get yours and tell me what you think. For gaming I set the "Magic Bright" setting to Dynamic contrast. For trolling the internets I set the "Magic Angle" to "Standing up"... or something like that. I'm not standing up -...

What's up with the constant .. ?

Hmmm I don't think so. In the computer world, the physical aspect ratio of the screen is the same as the pixel aspect ratio as far as I can tell. The pixel density is the same for a given width of screen no matter the aspect ratio. It's just that it gives you more vertical real estate in Windows.

The only reason I bought a 16:9 is because there are no 16:10 120Hz. Can't have it all... Life's a bitch then you die!

Getting a 3 monitor setup crossed my mind but I was afraid I'd have to sacrifice too much image quality to get it running at a decent framerate. And by decent, I mean 60fps. I was also afraid my wife would think I'd completely lost it. ;) I opted for a 120Hz 27" and I really like it so far...

Not exactly, but like I said I have the 27" version. (S27A950D) It's about the same price as this one except it doesn't have a TV tuner. As far as I could tell by quickly glancing at the page you linked. It's a TN panel so it has poor viewing angles but other than that it's a great gaming...

Them fighting words!? I have the 27" S27A950D and I won't repeat what it just said about your mom.

Personally, for gaming, I'd pick the Asus without hesitation. Actually, I'd pick the VG236HE without the silly 3D glasses and save about $150. Mostly because I'm a zealous 120Hz apostle. Don't listen to the heretics.

Any hardcore pedants ready to help this casual young man? :p

Screen tearing happens when the screen and video card are desynchronized, ie when you go above your screen's refresh rate yes. It's less likely to happen at 120Hz than 60Hz for obvious reasons. You can fix that by enabling v-sync but it adds input lag. Which is intolerable in a first person...

Put the "blank" screensaver and hit preview.

iPad! What?

Of course, v-sync causes input lag, and screen tearing happens when your card pushes more than what your monitor can take. That's why a 120hz monitor is not just for pr0-g4m3rz. I've been repeating that the whole thread, a fact that many posters conveniently ignore. ;) Holy shit! :eek:

Make sure you're barking up the right tree. I didn't bring up the "gaming advantage" factor. I'm merely talking about a smoother and more enjoyable experience. I couldn't care less about highly competitive gaming. And my experience with 120hz might be subjective Elvn, but as far as I know...

That's all fine and dandy Elvn, except that I have the material to experience all of this for myself right here buddy and I know what I see. First of all, yes my dual 6870s can push most games above 60fps at 1080p and not only do I get smoother camera movement, I'm free of god damn screen...

It's not like the latest 120Hz TN panels look like shit either.

Sure, but look at the thread's title. ;) Well I do. :) Besides, it's not like $700 will get you a 27" IPS either right? The problem is the selection of 120Hz monitors is really limited. For a good one, you pretty much go from 23" to 27"...

A little smoother? :eek: I know we all have different priorities but I'm not sure you have much experience gaming@120Hz to downplay it like that. And I couldn't possibly care less about 3D. It's not only much smoother, it also allows you to get rid of screen tearing without the input lag of...

Well, that's what I'd do. No scratch that. I'm genetically unable to wait for anything so I probably would ebay a kidney or something. You see, my problem is that I've been cursed by experiencing gaming@120Hz. And I say cursed because these are all TN panels limited to 1080p and there are...

I don't know about DP adapters but unless I'm mistaking, you'll have to run your 120Hz@60Hz in multi-display. The lowest common dominator sets the resolution and the refresh rate. You'll have to deactivate the other screens when you game if you want to play at 120Hz, and trust me, you want. :)...

Yup, based on your preferences, the Benq XL2410T is the only option as far as I know. If you're willing to go down to 23", the ASUS VG236HE probably has a better image. That's based on the reviews I have read. I don't have any first-hand experience with any of those. I can vouch for the...

I think $300 is a little restricting for a monitor larger than 24". Especially considering you have a pretty kick ass rig. What kind of games do you play?

How much experience do you have with a 27" 1080p, 120Hz or not? ;) 1080p on 27" is perfectly fine for gaming, and that's coming from a 24" 1200p. For other tasks, it's not optimal I'll give you that, but the op mentioned BF3 as his priority. 2560x1600 or 1440 would be much better but...

Who are you replying to?

3D is a gimmick. 120Hz is not.

I'd be very interested to know how you feel about trading the S27A950D for the Asus NCX. I currently have the Samsung but I'm probably returning it. It has issues but there is no way in hell I can go back to 60Hz now.

Once you have a taste of 120hz there simply is no turning back. Impossible. For gaming, the super high res will only get you poor framerates. The Samsung will be nowhere near the PQ of the HP for other tasks, but if gaming is #1 on your priority list, a 120Hz is an absolute no-brainer. Trust me.

I won't pretend to be an expert but reviewers that actually experience all these monitors first-hand, unlike most forum enthusiasts, seem to really like the Asus PA246Q. Edit: Removed URLs because one of them was censored for some reason.

Clearly, we have an expert here. :rolleyes: Take a look at this little article. LED backlighting generally gives a wider color gamut, a better contrast ratio and lower power consumption but it's definitely not a guarantee of image quality by itself. Edge lit LEDs are prone to severe...