Separate names with a comma.
I wonder why you've ignored half of the comment.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 4GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has 3GB
not exactly unprecedented
...and why wouldn't it?
If GeForce GTX 1650 Ti ever come to exist, it would probably be a cutdown of GeForce GTX 1660, with fewer CUDA cores and half the memory, but the...
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has a 192-bit bus.
There is no reason why the GeForce GTX 1650 can't have a 192-bit bus.
That's a problem with the bus size, not a problem with the type of memory it uses.
That still doesn't make any sense.
Why would you put a faster memory in a slower video card?
It doesn't do anything except increase production...
Why would a lower end video card have better memory than a higher end video card?
...except, why would AMD needs to release new cards below Radeon RX 5600?
Anything below that could just be rebrand of older cards.
Well, the GeForce GTX 1660 uses GDDR5, so if there is a GeForce GTX 1650 Ti, it wouldn't use GDDR6.
1. Not everyone has a Micro Center nearby.
2. Are you saying that customers should assume the performance based on prices alone?
That is a very low end, very low margin market.
It doesn't make much sense for AMD to chase after that market.
It's to bring cohesion and make the lineup earlier to understand.
Let's say that you are the general consumer (not the type that visits [H])...
Well, the Radeon RX 580 isn't ~$300 anyway.
What AMD need are competitors to the GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
...and why wouldn't...
Radeon RX Vega 56 and Radeon Vega 64 have already have already discontinued.
It doesn't make sense to keep making them because of how expensive...
DDR6 is expensive and it makes no sense for AMD to put it in a $129 video card.
Of cause there is: it's to bring cohesion.
Many people who buy video cards are not enthusiasts who know how different video cards perform....
...and why wouldn't AMD do that?
Radeon RX 570 and Radeon RX 580 are based on an old design and uses 14nm die and GDDR5, which are relatively...
Get ready for Vega 2.0 Intel Xe
...brought to you by Raja Koduri
No, Raja Koduri Didn't Say Intel's Discrete GPUs Will Debut at $200
Next thing you know, the Radeon RX 570 and Radeon RX 580 get rebranded to the Radeon RX 5500 and Radeon RX 5500 XT
The are probably OEM-only variations.
Haven't your heard of how misinformation spread across the internet?
A disreputable source posted misinformation.
Pretty soon the misinformation...
So are you are telling me that cutting prices to the point of "[making] essentially no money" in order to gain market share is not engaging in a...
I already did. It is post #1044247350
I just didn't want to quote the same post twice.
It’s a good thing that AMD doesn’t have a CEO like IdiotInCharge who thinks that AMD should go into a price war with NVIDIA and destroy itself in...
It must be a huge coincident that Turing refresh just happens to come out at the same time as Navi.
As I said before:
I did, right in the comment that you've quoted.
...and what good is market share without profit?
Let's sale for no profit.
Why didn't Lisa Su think of that! /sarcasm
Review: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (X570)
BY IVÁN MARTÍNEZ
CPUS & APUS
After the analysis on a motherboard X470 , today it is the turn...
What you are looking to for is called BIOS Flashback.
Here are the motherboards that have the feature:...
Review: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (X470) (World Exclusive)
BY IVÁN MARTÍNEZ
CPUS & APUS
As is usual with the AMD news , we anticipate...
Let's say that AMD launched the Radeon RX 5700 for $299 and Radeon RX 5700 XT for $349.
Is NVIDIA going to do nothing and let AMD take its market...
Well, the Radeon RX 590 is the competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660.
AMD just needs a competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
Development take years.
What we see now is the result decisions that were made years ago.
It doesn't say much about what is happening right now.
So what you are saying is that AMD is missing a competitior to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.