Search results

Awesome, thanks, SamirD. I ordered the Lexmark.

Anybody found a decent color laser MFP either CDW outlet or elsewhere for $200 or less preferably with Linkyo [or other] replacement toner compatible? looking for something decent for my mother. Thanks.

Cross-posting my reply from the AMD Processors thread: My take after watching this was simply Jim playing "Devil's Advocate" and attempting to lay out a scenario where his sources/leakers are completely wrong and thus "Zen 2 will suck" but in the wrap-up, Jim states: "...I was talking to an...

My take after watching this was simply Jim playing "Devil's Advocate" and attempting to lay out a scenario where his sources/leakers are completely wrong and thus "Zen 2 will suck" but in the wrap-up, Jim states: "...I was talking to an AMD PR guy recently, and I told him I was planning this...

And Intel's 10nm was due [according to Intel] to drop in 2018, and in 2017, and in 2016, and originally in what 2015? At this point, what credence can Intel's claims regarding when either credible 10nm products or 10nm products that can combat Ryzen will release be given?

Cheaper for AMD to produce per card including the GPU die + RAM, not what the Vega(s) are currently selling for. For example, it has long been rumored that it's been costing AMD $100+ for each Vega card produced for the HBM stacks alone, not including the cost of the GPU die. Contrast that...

Jim/AdoredTV stated in his leak vid that his source(s) indicate that Navi's performance has pleased AMD enough to scrap the idea of bringing 7nm Vega GPUs to the consumer/gaming space. Which makes sense given both the much larger die size and reported production cost of Vega/HBM versus the...

PM on the 500GB WD Black + 500GB USB external drives.

PM on the RAM. Thanks.

Nice looking setup. Never done a custom cooling loop, but looks like it includes everything one would need for making a hard cooling loop.

RE: 1.5v+ Spikes From PB2/XFR2 AMD Robert is Robert Hallock aka AMD Technical Marketing https://imgur.com/a/xK5qVzW IOW, the 1.5v Spikes are NOT sustained 24/7 voltage, and are NOT going to degrade the Ryzen CPUs.

Thanks, Kyle and [H] for having the balls to make this public in the first place, and to keep banging the drums so to speak. Thanks as well to each and every individual who united and spoke [with wallets or otherwise] loudly and clearly and brought this insidious Bullshit to a stop.

Nice article, Thanks, Kyle. As mentioned, many have reported (in the OCN C6H + C7H OC threads + reddit) nice ST + MT gains by using a combination of bclk OC + CPU vcore offsets of between -0.05 and -0.1 with these 2600 and 2700s, so I also look forward to any further OC articles on that.

Opposing viewpoints are fine. Infantile ass-clowns flinging their diaper loads all over the various tech-forums to the point that it infringes a person's enjoyment/sanity when visiting forums, yeah those go straight to Ignore List, thank you very much.

Absolutely, the NDA is likely about Polaris. Only time will tell. And when Polaris drops, if a pair of either Polaris 11 or 10 equal or exceed 1070/1080 for less money, then Kyle was wholly incorrect, and AMD WOULD have an answer for 1070/1080. Again, only time will tell on that score as well.

Polaris RELEASES before Vega or Zen, certainly. That still leaves open the possibilty that info on Vega and/or Zen are shared with the Macau attendees and the NDA ON THAT INFO is what will expire on the 29th. Again, only AMD and the Macau attendees know for sure what the June 29th NDA pertains to.

A NDA supposedly (according to the now removed image posted by dglee) expires on the 29th. Could be Polaris, could be Vega, could be Zen, nobody outside of those attending the Macau event or AMD know exactly what NDA lifts on the 29th. But predictably, that hasn't stopped the anti-AMD...

Got a TON of assorted buffoons, clowns, douch-nozzles and asshats on my list, so much less agitation when visiting these forums. Never would have thought the [H] crew/forums as a result of "info" like this post might soon join Ignore as well, but, I will not mourn or shed tears if that comes to...

Iris Pro is TOO EXPENSIVE to put into tablets, phones, midrange offerings, etc. And since those product segments are where the bulk of the profits are, THAT is where it would benefit Intel to include AMD GPU IP.

But here's the thing: AMD GPU performance compared to Intel GPU performance is KNOWN, NOW. Hundreds of tech sites/outlets/etc have tested, and measured AMD GPU tech, and outside of Iris Pro, ALL AGREE WITH DATA to corroborate that, that AMD's GPU performance is superior, again outside of Iris...

AMD have reportedly secured Polaris contracts with Apple: Apple to adopt AMD's new Polaris graphics chips in upcoming Macs - report And there have been whispers that Intel is in negotiations to license AMD GPU IP: Bloomberg: Intel in talks with AMD to license GPU patents SO let's recap. Many...

[H] has painted themselves into a corner. When Polaris drops, if it performs well and is a significant improvement in Perf/W, then [H] and it's "sources" "data" and declared "non-bias" are laid out for all to see. [H] has become one step closer to WTF, Tech!?!? with this article (based on...

And then there are the countless times in reviews where AMD either outperforms nVidia or performance is roughly equivalent, yet, somehow "gameplay feel" is somehow superior on nVidia according to [H] even in the instances where AMD is outperforming nVidia offerings. Nah, that couldn't be bias...

You're right, the [H] bias started coming in on page 2 in the HBM and 4GB section. Starting in on the "980Ti has 6GB, Fury X only has 4GB" early in the first several pages. Refusing to acknowledge the sprinkling badly coded games--which just happen to almost exclusively be...

Bunk, brother man. The bias/slant started from nearly the opening paragraphs, well before the performance data even came in the review. Go back an re-read it your damn self. It's there, it not a figment of anyone's imagination. It was clear enough that many of us called [H] out on it, and it...

Deny the bias all you want, anyone is free to read the Fury X review and compare it to all the AMD reviews that have come after it. The change in "tone" after that Fury X review is plain and clear.

The Fury X review is where the anti-AMD slant/bias/call-it-what-you-choose was MOST EVIDENT. In the comments for that review, many of us pointed out the utter lack of objectivity, slant, pot-shots, etc. ONLY then, and in the subsequent AMD reviews have [H] made clear changes/strides in being...

And in the last several years, as well as in this very post the [H] crew have demonstrated an anti-AMD/pro nVidia slant most evident, as noted above, since the Fury X launch. So, don't feign outrage when your very words and actions come back to bite [H] in the ass like this non-invite...

Sure. But AMD themselves have stated that Polaris is targeting the MIDRANGE, not the top-end. Ergo, if, as Kyle states the [H] readership is concerned with the top-end and Polaris is NOT top-end, then [H] and it's readership is not the target demographic for Polaris. See how that works?

"This is censorship from AMD. Nothing more. Nothing less." BS. [H] is NOT being censored, they can write anything they choose, up to and including purchasing/testing/reviewing AMD Polaris cards, if they choose as well as this very thread. [H] simply was not invited to an event that pertains to...

1. "...[H] readership is very much focused on the top end..." 2. "...Honestly, there is likely not much to miss here, as we do not think AMD has any answer for GTX 1080.." AMD has stated the Polaris products are aimed at the ~$300 (and under) price range, I.E. NOT the top-end. [H] does not...

Right. AMD demonstrated Polaris behind closed doors over 5 MONTHS AGO at CES, yet they "only just got engineering qualification samples" back? Do you clowns even THINK about this nonsensical clap-trap before you spew it? There's a difference between "rumors" and illogical, outright bullshit and...

AMD's 390/390x/Furies are CURRENTLY in DX12 equal to or considerably outperforming 980Ti as well as everything else nVidia depending on game, so no, this laughable rumor is ALREADY BS, and laughable BS at that.

Capitalism IS Maniuplation/Competition. Buying/compromising regulators/politicians, or other might (economic or otherwise) makes right, monopolistic tactics to gain advantage over others IS Capitalism/Competition. Those who benefit (including the 1% of the 1%) are simply OUT-COMPETING those who...

SO, it's pointless to speculate positively about AMD products based on rumors/PR, but just fine to speculate positively for nVidia (also based on rumors/PR)?

If your original post wasn't a joke, the numbers are footnotes referencing the specifics of each mentioned case. Almost certainly AMD's own footnotes as I imagine Steve copy and pasted that information directly from AMD supplied reference materials.

It IS still scheduled for a Q4 2016 launch according to recent statements from AMD. Remember that not only is the "source" of this FUDzilla, but there are many FUD-ers in these very forums who's main purpose appears to be spreading their tainted non-information regarding AMD all over these...

Some points from [H]'s Fury review: 1. Witcher 3 Apples-To-Apples with Gameworks features/options ON the 980 wins by 15%, while with Gameworks features/options OFF, the Fury wins by 6%. A 21% difference in performance for the Fury between having Gameworks features/options enabled or not...

Can't speak for others, but I personally will not give one cent to purchase or play TWIMTBP/Gameworks games and Nvidia + Intel products because I simply DO NOT condone intentionally gimping a competitor to make your products look better. I DO NOT condone or agree with intentionally gimping...

Brent and Kyle can continue to claim that the blackbox crippletastic garbage that is Gameworks makes no difference in the results of AMD cards if they so choose. The simple truth is that AMD cannot fully de-cripple the performance of AMD cards in Gameworks games--because they cannot see the code...