Search results

if you were prepared to drop 740 on a 11900k you could have easily gotten a 5950X or 5900X

I see AMD selling the 5600G around the 200 mark and may be reducing the 5600x to 250. I still think we will see a 5600XT on more mature 7nm which will be around 300 as it will compete with the 8 core 11700. the 3600 is pretty old news now and merely exists as surplus it's a year and a half...

As he says, if you are prepared to give up a lot of performance but get enough to game okay for a while then the 11400 is okay, the 3600 at stock was still competitive even though it is very old by now standard. If you can't wait for AMD new releases then it is okay

most resellers will flash the bios if you ask, that's only relevant if you are putting a 5000 series part on a 400 series board.

you can always get a 5800x, then you'll have the best, solving all problems

the 11500/400 may only be interesting in that they are cheap build parts, designed for H of B chipsets and decent entry level gaming systems with lower end graphics cards. the 5600x at 65w and it can work well on a mid level B550 or B450 board makes it a better part if power is a factor...

5700G 5600G 5300G APU's confirmed

ordered a 5600X

lol you posted benches against older Zen processors. games like CSGO, F1 have every Zen part roflstomping the 11900k. Intel does not beat AMD by 30-40 frames at all at best a 1-3FPS range though it's slower on average as well as hotter than the sun. if he stays with Intel he should wait it...

a perfect Intel launch, hype and false claims for 2 months with the internet bombarded by clickbait. on review day it is almost like rocket lake doesn't exist. the 11600k is kind of at the FX8350 treatment of buy if you want cheap, though some places have a 5600x for around 300 dollars which...

just buy AMD

Intel will pull an Intel and discontinue previous gen

the 5600x at 65watts was murdering the 11600k at +125watts in almost everything. the 11600k is just nice because it is a budget gamer build. if the 5600x drops to 300 dollars it's over

so ummm the 11900k was barely faster than the 5800X when cl9cked to the moon. it's a disaster let's call it that. hot and slow is the common theme

Something is odd about that as the 11700K is about 5600, the all core boost is not that much higher to get 6800. That is probably a fixed max overclock score.

So Joaquin Pheonix is now doing tech reviews

just reduce price on the 5600X and release a 5600XT

why is everyone defaulting to AMD must drop prices. AMD current pricing is based on something that's been out half a year and roflstomped the competition. Going on gsmersnexus AMD have absolutely nothing to panic about. we know a 5300G which is the fastest 4C/8T part is coming out which...

great news it now officially means Intel competes against TSMC and the agreement is now avoidable as it is a conflict of interest. AND bumped to preferential

AMD is worth a lot more than 20 billion, if nvidia wanted to buy arm for 40 billion then AMD is probably around 100 billion. didn't they buy xilinx for 20 billion?

Don't play games, other than minecraft and a couple of older classics like command and conquer and Age of Empires, of which all run extremely well on my Mac M1.

sure, physics dictates that either the throughput is higher or frequency is higher but never both together. a cpu with more throughput wins in nearly all scenarios bar maybe gaming. however in gaming Intel doesn't have the advantage they used to have and general usage is stacked in favour...

the results seem in line with the expectation for the 11700k however and as many Ryzen 5800x owners will confirm the scores are low like the CPU was throttled to 4.5ghz. it seems baseline and not best case. the 11700k is more or less the same just with weaker multicore scaling and will need...

i will give Intel the win on boxing, AMD is old school until you buy a Threadripper.

that is about as cool as it gets

it isn't even fun making fun of Intel anymore

I would say yes, the 5800X turned out to be the champion chip of the generation.

somewhere between hot and hotter the 700 and 900 is about as fast as a 5800k in perfect conditions

high IPC with lower frequency will always beat lower IPC with high frequency. Frequency and IPC are mutually exclusive. outside of Intel generated tests it is likely that Rocket Lake is around 3-5% better than comet lake in the 4ghz challenge. removing frequency will show the true IPC...

one of my friends who used to be hell no on AMD bought a 5950X and top end Radeon. Out the box he tells me the CPU has plenty performance. he did say the overclocking is far more intricate than Intel's click and go but the difference in hitting the sweet spot is significant. under 45A the...

just some issues. first off the chip was bought retail which means Intel sold them off earlier. they should foresee the risk of early reviews because of this. the second question is, is it unethical. that will depend on what side of the road you are. most in anandtechs position would...

wasn't far off when I said the 700k would be slower than a 5800X in most applications and the 900k at 5.3ghz is needed to beat a 4.7-4.8ghz 5800x. the 5900 family has no rival in even a core cruncher from team blue unless you go Xeon. this is a bit like watching the 2500k destroy the 8350...

Intel will run anything where the higher clock speed can com0ensate for lower PIC or where AVX gimmicks the results oh and gimmick storage like all these fake gimmicks Intel has used from lucid logic to rapid storage. 11900k for 600 bucks is a rip off and shows Intel to be out of touch with reality

it is very easy to perform, lock the CPU to 4ghz on both AND and Intel is simple. At 4ghz true PIC should be visible. nobody will run a Z motherboard on a 11700 either, should have been tested on a H board with lower spec RAM. if GN review on the 10400 is an indicator the Z board with high...

if RL iris is considerably slower than Renoir there is no way AL will be entry to mainstream level with on chip performance. AMD will hit that way before Intel does due to experience

rocket lake benches why are all these performance results taken against a not optimised AMD baseline? the 11900k has nearly 11% higher frequency and is < 10% faster than the 5800X in multi threaded performance the 11700k scores less than a 5800k with about 6% higher frequency. I wish they...

by 3x more powerful is that Flops? 3x better than Rocket Lake makes it a 1660ti and that I doubt very much.

a 11 year old 2600K still games well today hardly a yard stick for success. The whole but for Intel screwing up 10nm is the same straw man argument as but for bulldozer AMD may have had Ryzen by 2011. Intel's 10nm failure is due to failing to understand the intricate and complex nature of...

Intel need someone like Lisa su, su took over a dire situation but always did whatever it took to maximise the situation. Zen was a goldmine and Lisa su doesn't seem content with just enough, this resonates through AMD and there will be no coasting through. Intel seems to be behind the...

maybe bent pins. Never had a CPU fail, still have a working 486, just no working RAM