Search results

Has anyone tried fitting a Rampage in this case? Official specs say it's too wide, but I'd like to see for myself.

I'm disappointed in the OC's so far. Tweaktown didn't even hit 1400mhz and guru3d only hit 1500!? The absurd 8.7gbps memory won't do that much for actual gaming performance. Amazing stock temperatures and sound levels though.. but who buys only one of these things? Can we stick to 2 slot...

OP knows that..

Not even. They list the Fury X with a TDP of 375W, Titan X with 165W, and 980 with 250W.

These benchmarks are all over the place. How is it that much faster than a 980 Ti but slower than a 980?

I couldn't agree more. Everyone complaining about legacy connectivity probably don't need a Fury X. I also had a Qnix Evo 2 @ 115hz, and boy was it a shit experience. What do you expect from a single legacy input monitor for $260 with no real company behind it? SMH. Thanks AMD for...

Oh, woops, ignore my comment about 40 fps & the Titan. Was looking at a 4k SURROUND bench on normal settings lol.

At the beginning of the stream, Lisa Su also said that the Fury X was running Tomb Raider at 60 fps at 4k. The Titan X averages 40 fps in that game. That's about the best we have in terms of performance #$'s right now.

AMD themselves said it burns 275W at the most during the live stream.

I honestly can't tell if Gsync even works. Still stutters below 60 fps, so to me, it was wasted money. 144hz with the 1ms input is incredible for fast pace and competitive games like Battlefield, but not that useful for other games. Watercooled 290's? Hang on to those until the 490X or Nv...

I ran my Korean at 110hz as well (sometimes 120hz), but switched to the 144hz Swift. It is MILES better.. The Swift colors are terrible, but it was worth the switch. 144hz is so much more usable than 110-120.

The pre OC'd cards are 100% safe as they are WAY lower than what the card can actually do. They wouldn't sell a product that is pushing itself to the limit or anywhere close.

First the Krait, now this! MSI knows what people want!

King at 1080p 60hz sure. Many of us have graduated and moved onto wqhd or bigger years ago.

Make sure you have active cooling over your ITX mobo. Pumping all those volts into the CPU put my ITX board at 128C, and with no cooling, would crash.

295x2. No need for anymore Titan anythings.

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2014/05/27/watch_dogs_amd_nvidia_gpu_performance_preview/5#.U4TDRCgkRVQ Enjoy your 770 :rolleyes:

I love how utterly wrong everyone is about 1440p. It is incredibly demanding. There is no point in using all your resources on resolution alone. There are more factors to image quality than that, and that's what you give up for raw resolution. EXACTLY. If 1440p were so easy to drive...

This is EK's solution, not AMD's

BROKEN PCI-E SLOT WORTH IT. So sexy.

So you're saying your 680 and 2600K performs just about as good as my GTX 780 Ti and 4930K @ 4.4? Hell, even in SLI I will sometimes dip to 50fps depending on the map and server circumstances. again, "just fine"

No offense, but everyone wants to believe their setup runs "just fine." With a $999 monitor, you should be striving for maximum quality. G-sync wouldn't exist if 40fps lows and 80fps highs were acceptable... you want 60fps MINIMUMS to avoid a compromised experience. I've used 670 PE SLI at...

yes. Your 680's won't even run 2560x1440 that well unless you turn down AA.. but who buys 2 $500 gpu's and a $1500 monitor for medium settings?

Nice, those are my daily drivers. No matter what else I hear I can't leave the 800's for more than half a day. What source?

WOW, SLI WORKS AND 71% IMPROVEMENT FOR ROME 2! WHOPPING 45 FPS WITH 780 TI SLI AND 3960X! Rome 2 was the biggest failure in years.

The answer is simple. Buy a GTX 780 and spend the $200 budget surplus and get a half decent motherboard. You have a big full tower case, there's no reason not to have a full fledged Z87 ATX board. Throw in a 2nd 780 later. Anyone who says they run everything maxed out with a single card @...

The REAL question is... who would trade a 780 Ti for a PS4?!

Roger. Bold move unless it's for the same price as a TB.

You guys think EVGA will undercut the Titan Black by releasing an identical 6gb 780 Ti?

Get the 780 Classifieds when they are below $500 after rebate and buy 3 instead of 2 Ti's, or spend the difference on water blocks.

No guys. Trust him.

Why would we trust a guy who thinks vram bottlenecking is a myth, uses 660's at 1600p, and truly believes AA makes no difference?

I didn't read the thread but 780 Ti is the only answer. 3-way Gk110 scaling sucks ass especially for resolutions below Surround. I would know, I had 3x and hated it.

I don't trust jack shit from Techspot anymore after they released this graph:

My 4930k @4.4 and 2x 780 Ti under water gets 38fps in the Rome 2 bench after today's patch. /fail

Could also be a glitch in the game, although I have not experienced it

The scopes don't do that, so it's your card.

I can bench my Superclocked Ti's under water at 1255mhz core and 8035mhz memory. I play at 1230mhz/8000ghz 24/7, or stock during League of Legends because that game is bullshit and is unstable with any GPU OC or refresh rate OC.

5 GK110 cards in 15 months all launching at $650-1000 and cannibalizing the previous card in price and/or performance. Has the consumer market not learned their lesson when it comes to investing in Nvidia flagships? Or Nvidia in general? Titan lasted 3 months before faster 780's arrived for...

Nice build. Mine is very similar (same mobo, ram, 4930k, 480 rads, red led's, etc). Enthoo Primo FTW!