Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
Borg is good. But it's all terminal based. No idea about graphical frontends.
I just run the script to back up and prune. If I need something I run a command to mount the backup as a FUSE filesystem, browse as normal.
Surprised Microsoft is interested in this, handhelds have a lot less screen real estate for ads.
Though it would be quite funny if they had to fix most of the major issues with 11 to make this work.
The great ones did 100% but practically all of the cheaper chips would do 50%+. Intel had tons of headroom on them and the boards usually had FSB headroom too. Good times.
Retro is a state of mind, unlocked multiplier and locked bus overclocking doesn't feel retro to me. It will undoubtedly be 15 years old either way.
I really need to amass a small collection of 775 CPUs to play with. They might be too slow to run anything new but they'll always be fun to tweak.
Late reply, but I've personally found that ycruncher's benchmarks will fail immediately if I have any memory instability. I've seen people talk about how AM5 CPUs can take hours to show instability but my 3000 will immediately fail out the longer benchmarks. If I can pass the longer benchmarks...
^^^ Overpaid like crazy for the 875 version of that board on my first build. I miss it now, not because it was particularly good but because I'll take the UV plastics over RGB any day.
Someone could bring it back on some cheap matx board and get a ton of publicity, maybe start selling UV LEDs.
Biggest problem I have in the GUI is knowing what the name is for the application that does the commands I know in the terminal. But they can be largely avoided now.
I know people want their CPUs, but don't pretend paper launches haven't been a thing for a long, long time...
Though I wish AMD would be more clear about availability.
I'm in the "3900X if I can't get a 3950X" club at this point. Will find out tomorrow.
Gonna be smug as hell if I actually pick up a 3950X that's for sure.
I remember reading about the 3950X having a "65W" mode but I don't recall any of the reviews actually testing it.
105W TDP, actual power consumption is well above that. But it's VERY close to the 3900X because of binning and how AMD handles power limits.
Haha yeah sounds like there might be a mini [H] meet if MC actually has any in stock lol
I called Duluth myself. From the sounds of things I'm not optimistic about either having any in stock :(
Should give him a ring, I'd rather not drag myself out to MC at 10am if they're not gonna have what I need in stock. :(
I'm assuming they ACTUALLY know by now what they'll have in stock come Monday.
Called my local and they basically just said they didn't know. If they don't I think I'll just pick up a 3900X and be done with it, not willing to wait another 2-3 months for a CPU.
Would also be very disappointing to see AMD do a paper launch, particularly when they had a time gap between the...
Intel finding new and "exciting" ways to re-release the same chips and get more reviews to attract clicks. It's all just mildly refined 2017 dies, be it this or the HDET refresh.
But reviewers need the clicks too, it's not like they're gonna say "meh it's a clock bumped 9900K, not worth a review".
Maybe not on it's own, but it's obvious that BOTH AMD and Intel aren't able to just leave clock speed on the table like they have in the past. As soon as AMD started being competitive Intel went from selling chips with 500-1000mhz of headroom to selling chips with more like 100-200mhz of...
Or or or, we could all chill out and wait for launch and real reviews with real overclocking numbers instead of angry typing on the internet?
Hahaha just kidding.
(Also why would you argue with someone whose profile says they're Anti-AMD, just ignore it lol)
Maybe it's been mentioned before... but back to the OP, asking MS to just make 10 more 7-esque. There's another topic in the forum right now about how MS has tacked a bunch of telemetry onto the side of 7. Nowhere near as bad as 10 I imagine, but still pushing 7 in a bad direction.
But, let's...
And I guess that's what I'm worried about the most, sticks using adhesive strong enough to actually damage the chips when you try to remove them.
It's increasingly hard to find decent speed sticks without gaudy massive heat spreaders on them that make cooler compatibility tricky. I still...
Sure enough, look what got posted today:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=clearlinux-main-desktop&num=1
I don't imagine it'd be fun to run that in the long term, with having to upgrade all of your packages at once...
Has anyone tried removing heat spreaders from modern ram? I'm willing to bet they aren't really needed to keep the ram cool, but would help a lot for cooler compatibility, ignoring those weird super tall sticks that some companies make...
Were they hard to remove? Did you see major temp...
Ah, that makes sense. Kinda foreign... but makes sense.
It seems to perform well on AMD as well, based on stuff done by Phoronix. Surprisingly doesn't seem to bias Intel CPUs, from what I recall.
I wonder how clear linux gets compiled? They do some crazy optimization with that but the last time I read about how they build the OS, it sounded very strange.
It does look quite good, I want to say there was some water effect in the trailer that looked super nice... I wanna say it was Yoshi.
The resolution isn't fantastic... but framerate is important.