Yeh I agree, but I have seen him say that at least 100x lol, I agree that grey is better but I do not find black to be THAT bad, backlight bleed, IPS glow, IPS black levels in general are more of a problem than a grey or black bezel.
Its literally completely pointless having more fans than you need to do the following things :
Get enough new air into the case to feed the CPU + GPU + a bit extra for case temp etc.
Remove that air before it builds up heat in the case and is not re-circulated by the CPU + GPU.
Basically that...
That just shows that they COULD release all 90-100% perfect panels... as the reviewers get cherry picked ones. But they don't and just hope people accept some of these terrible panels I have seen on forums etc.
Is the "LG Electronics 27MB85Z 27-Inch IPS Colour Prime Monitor" the same monitor as this? That is the only one available in the UK, is it the same monitor, but with thunderbolt?
I got 4/5 first try and 5/5 second try on NAD D1050 + Shure SRH 1540, was not really listening for anything specific except which one sounded more "HIFI"
You cannot really try to listen for "flaws" because the flaws are in the recording and will be there anyway, if you listen for clarity and...
I don't see the problem with the gamma, it looks like 2.4 BT1886 gamma, which is 2.4 gamma and goes down a bit near black so there is no black crushing.
Yes that was what I meant, if you could just apply a calibration and it worked perfectly with everything then that would be good, but unfortunately it is nothing like that.
I have not ever had to RMA with Asus before, Are they really that bad? Is Dell better for that sort of thing? Not sure if Dell or Asus is likely to have better quality control, the Asus is £40 cheaper, they both look decent enough, hmm not sure.
Which would you get out of these? They seem to use the same panel and are similar, the MX27AQ is £40 cheaper than the Dell. I was going to get a Gsync 1440p IPS but I think I will just get a 60hz and get adaptive sync when it is cheaper and works with both manufacturers.
Because its a finnicky, very time consuming, and annoying process, if it was as simple as selecting settings, calibrating, putting the file somewhere and having perfect calibration, I expect a lot more people would be interested.
The 4k OLED looks great for most games, but they really need to get the input lag below 30ms. Not sure how you can play games like battlefront with 50ms lag, I cannot aim properly on my TV which has 32ms.
Is there a problem with colorimeters and rec 2020? Or is it because OLED is better than SRGB but cannot cover the full REC2020? Sort of a no mans land if you will.
I want to see a 48" 4k OLED for under £2000, then we can call OLED affordable and competitive with LED prices. I wouldn't call £3000 affordable for most people and 55" is too big for a lot of people, 48" would have better PPI and big enough, I would rather have 48" with 92PPI for games. 40" =...
It isn't really matte like the heavy AG on TN screens, its a light AG coating and from an angle is reflective. Obviously not full glossy, but nor are any monitors anymore except cheap ones.
Yes its loud and does not work properly, look at the size of it, its rubbish, remove it and put a better one on there. Even a £25 one is a huge improvement.
Yes you could buy a 64k 1700PPI screen with 132 megapixels resolution... But half of windows would still look complete crap because of the scaling lol.
Also double the price for a 4k OLED vs a LCD, that is the main "aspect that I value most" If 4k OLED was the same price there would be no contest at all.
I have a Sony (2nd top of the range) and the CMS is rubbish, no 10 point white balance or proper RGB controls etc. Not acceptable on a high end TV, Also they use AUoptronics now instead of sony/samsung VA panels.
You can't really compare DSR to native 1440p / 4k though. I use DSR on my 1080p TV when games can still run it at 60fps, its better than 1080p but not comparable at all to a 4k or 1440p screen.
Yes its better is has 3.7 megapixels vs 2.1 megapixels on 1080p. 4K (8.3MP) is just ridiculous currently unless you have SLI 980ti. 1440p on a single 980ti runs very well.
Here is a comparison of a 27" vs 60" screen, some people say they don't want to go from 24 > 27 because it is too big LOL. Sorry but 60" is just completely ABSURD as a PC monitor.
Gsync is much better than ULMB, ULMB is like have PWM at 100-120hz + 20% lower contrast, yes it lowers the blur, but it also gives me a headache and has very obvious flickering, which is worse, especially as you cannot use Gsync at the same time, I pick Gsync every time.