I ran Cinebench on all CPUs I could

M76

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
14,006
I ran Cinebench R20 on all CPUs I could get access to. Why? Because I could. Take it or leave it.

cinebench2.png


Update: Added new results
 
Last edited:
where are the Pentiums 4's?

Cinebench R20 requires Windows 7 and a CPU which support EM64T and SSE3. This eliminates all but about 28 Pentium 4s. It also requires 4 GB of RAM, which takes that list down further since 4 GB was not a common configuration at the time and many motherboards had problems supporting more than 3.5 GB due to chipset limitations.
 
Thanks for compiling this. Gulftown still putting up a fight all these years later. Few if any platforms can compare to the longevity X58 has provided.
 
I like the C2D E7400 vs the G3900 at the top. Both 2C/2T, 2.8Ghz, no turbo. More than twice the performance at slightly less TDP with a ~modern platform.
 
Stock 9900KS (just used default values - I am a noob with Cinebench):

9900ks_cinebenchR20.png
 
If you want to add a [email protected] to your list I was able to find an old screenshot I posted on the forum as the original screenshot was deleted a while back.

198999_Bench.png
 
Ignore the 4.4Ghz OC I have no idea of what happened there. But here is mine stock and OC'ed to 4.3Ghz all core, on a 3900x.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    134.2 KB · Views: 0
Here is my new iBuyPower Ryzen 3700X at work at stock settings


RE1wNv6.jpg



And here is the i7 860 it will replace..

MHMQ3x7.png
 

Attachments

  • Ryzen3700X_CineBenchR20_zpsumw4fbpa.png
    Ryzen3700X_CineBenchR20_zpsumw4fbpa.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 123
Last edited:
Here is my result for my current main i7-4790K rig (CPU at default clocks):

4790k.png


That's a darned good score for a five-year-old quad-core CPU.

I will be upgrading to a more modern CPU platform very soon, as some of the programs that I'm currently running now require a 6th-Generation or newer Intel Core series CPU or its AMD performance/feature equivalent in order to run properly.
 
Here is my result for my current main i7-4790K rig (CPU at default clocks):

View attachment 204629

That's a darned good score for a five-year-old quad-core CPU.

I will be upgrading to a more modern CPU platform very soon, as some of the programs that I'm currently running now require a 6th-Generation or newer Intel Core series CPU or its AMD performance/feature equivalent in order to run properly.

That was before today's upgrade. I now have an AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and 32 GB of DDR4-3200 RAM (versus the Intel i7-4790K CPU and 32 GB of DDR3-1600 RAM in my previous build).

Here are the results from my 3800X at default clocks:

3800X1.png
 
I updated the list with new and contributed results.
 
My current system. Ryzen 2600x running PB2. The vast majority of the test was running 3.9-3.95Ghz all core. Would probably be a bit better if I wasn't using the stock cooler.

The higher score is a previous run from a while back but seems to fit the normal variance for different runs I've seen. If you add this you can pick whichever score you want.

CBench20-Ryzen2600x-mini.jpg
 
Are new threadrippers allowed here in the Intel forum?
 

Attachments

  • cb-r20.jpg
    cb-r20.jpg
    117.6 KB · Views: 0
Sweet. My Q6600 is still the oldest CPU on the list so far. :D
 
I could run it on virtually any range of CPU's you can imagine. I actually collect CPU's. I have enough in my collection. However, I neither have motherboards for all of them, nor the desire to do it.
 
I love how OC now days is all core.

OC is nothing more than a marketing term anymore.
 
I love how OC now days is all core.

OC is nothing more than a marketing term anymore.

Not true. Overclocking is still a thing, but we aren't going up by 800MHz+ anymore. Now its a couple hundred MHz, or as you said making the boost clock the all core value. The 9900KS can be taken to 5.2GHz. 9900K / 9900KF can do 5.0GHz. I've got a 9600K that can do 5.1GHz etc. Ordinarily, the 9900K/KF boosts to 4.9 despite what's advertised. The 5.0GHz number is Turbo Boost Max 3.0 on two cores, but its very specific circumstances that let this happen. I rarely saw it in testing. On Ryzen's you do trade single-threaded performance, but you can pick up allot in multi-threaded workloads by clocking them 100-200MHz higher. Boosting is erratic and won't stay at 4.05GHz all the time or whatever. Locking it down to 4.2GHz or 4.3GHz all core makes a difference.
 
I could run it on virtually any range of CPU's you can imagine. I actually collect CPU's. I have enough in my collection. However, I neither have motherboards for all of them, nor the desire to do it.

So, I'm moving back to Dallas (Rockwall) in January, maybe find an open weekend day?

I shoot guns too... ;)

[and need to do more product photography projects for my other hobby...]
 
I added a few new results of my own. I don't think anyone will be able to beat my new lowest record without cheating.
 
Sweet. My Q6600 is still the oldest CPU on the list so far. :D
I've got plenty of older stuff I could run it on if anyone cared for reference. Also have an old 9850 BE rig still together I could add to the bottom of the list lol.
 
Phenom I 9850 @ 3.1Ghz
At least its not the slowest score posted lol.
 

Attachments

  • CBR20.jpg
    CBR20.jpg
    518.5 KB · Views: 0
Felt the score was low so reran today. Quite a difference something must have kicked off in the background when I was running it the first time.
 

Attachments

  • CBR20_1.jpg
    CBR20_1.jpg
    305.8 KB · Views: 0
No screenshots, I can post them if interested. I think - I may not have the really low score shots saved.

All clocks stock, I don't think any of these are even OC-able.

Intel Atom Z8350 - 121

Intel M3-7Y30 - 536

Intel I5-5300U (NUC) - 581

Intel I5-8500 - 2369 This was one of those little HP ProDesk 600G4 I bought NIB W10 Pro installed w/keyboard and mouse for $300 shipped. Quite the sleeper rig.

OC

Intel I9-7920X @ 4.8 - 7562

Intel I9-7980XE @4.6 - 10,583 @4.7 - 10,845 Still gets crushed by the huge Threadripper stuff
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikeo
like this
No screenshots, I can post them if interested. I think - I may not have the really low score shots saved.

All clocks stock, I don't think any of these are even OC-able.

Intel Atom Z8350 - 121

Intel M3-7Y30 - 536

Intel I5-5300U (NUC) - 581

Intel I5-8500 - 2369 This was one of those little HP ProDesk 600G4 I bought NIB W10 Pro installed w/keyboard and mouse for $300 shipped. Quite the sleeper rig.

OC

Intel I9-7920X @ 4.8 - 7562

Intel I9-7980XE @4.6 - 10,583 @4.7 - 10,845 Still gets crushed by the huge Threadripper stuff

Nice clocks on the 7980XE. Your just a couple points behind my 10980XE scores.
 
3930K @ 4.3GHz R20 - 2333
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-12-30_15-15-57.png
    upload_2019-12-30_15-15-57.png
    43.1 KB · Views: 0
Nice clocks on the 7980XE. Your just a couple points behind my 10980XE scores.

I think I actually got slightly better scores later, that 4.6 run was like the first day the bench was released, but never cracked 11K so I just lived with what I had - I run it at 4.6, the 4.7 run was the only time I ever ran it at that OC.

It's a sweet rig, so much better than the X99 (5960X) rig before it.
 
Back
Top