Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
165W TDP
Toasty.
Well, as long as we all have a phase-change industrial cooling pump, which may or may not be legal depending on the country, we should be good.Well that's at 165w. At 5.1ghz I'm thinking 500w+.
165W TDP
Toasty.
where are all the guys that use to joke on amd for having 140w processors?? and calling them space heaters and what not? Hell my 8370 is only a 125w part...
Ten cores for six hundred bucks? Uh no thanks. Provided this even shows up.
to be fair, they were space heaters, lol.. but that being said as always TDP ratings are complete horse shit from both companies so they don't really mean anything.
Well i for one have never factored it. Also never disabled HT. Havent been compomised yet either.i remember when intel people said TDP was a factor when buying a cpu.
i believe it was back in 2016. you know... before ryzen.
16 cores pwned hyperthreading and chock full of intel security holes.
sign me up.
Here is that very platform the the W1375x on water.Well, as long as we all have a phase-change industrial cooling pump, which may or may not be legal depending on the country, we should be good.
View attachment 192886
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/t...owed-at-computex-it-needs-some-cooling,4.html
Well, as long as we all have a phase-change industrial cooling pump, which may or may not be legal depending on the country, we should be good.
View attachment 192886
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/t...owed-at-computex-it-needs-some-cooling,4.html
This never gets old. Ever.
So about 300w+ when using the usual auto OC while quoting a '165w' tdp.165W TDP
Toasty.
i remember when intel people said TDP was a factor when buying a cpu.
i believe it was back in 2016. you know... before ryzen...
Promising what? This was a single, short sentence said in an interview that looks to have been taken out of context and posted for outrage bait. Intel has been careful to not promise anything they achieve in a lab setting since the Devil's Canyon debacle.Lmao last time Intel made a promise....it came with big as water chiller unit
5.1ghz all core on liquid is about as vague as fuck. Sure liquid at 5c chilled.
165w tdp doesnt mean squat to me. I could care less if it were 200 watts as long as the claims were authentic but they are not. Intels word is a toilet bowl full of burning feces.
Intel should stop talking, stop pressing, stop marketing, just hush up and drop the bomb ass performance on AMD but Intel cant and wont.
AMD's Ryzen boost debacle is a much greater marketing fail than anything Intel has messed up lately.
AMD's Ryzen boost debacle is a much greater marketing fail than anything Intel has messed up lately.
I like seeing all of the folks with 250W GPUs complain about 165W CPUs.
AMD's Ryzen boost debacle is a much greater marketing fail than anything Intel has messed up lately.
I think the 22+ CPU hardware-level exploits over the last 2 years from Intel have been just a little bigger of a marketing failure than the Ryzen Boost debacle.AMD's Ryzen boost debacle is a much greater marketing fail than anything Intel has messed up lately.
I think the 22+ CPU hardware-level exploits over the last 2 years from Intel have been just a little bigger of a marketing failure than the Ryzen Boost debacle.
I think the 22+ CPU hardware-level exploits over the last 2 years from Intel have been just a little bigger of a marketing failure than the Ryzen Boost debacle.
That rating is factor in the overclockability of the silicon. If one brand CPU is a 165W part, and the comparable (price wise probably) brand B part is 95W, guess which one has more OC headroom?
It was a valid comparison then, it's a valid comparison now. Difference is now the power envelope seems to be much more similar between the brands (even if they each measure it differently), so it is not as much of a stand out factor as it was back in 2016.