1080TI SLI vs 2080 TI

My anecdotal experience says to go with a single 2080Ti. To give you an idea of where I'm coming from, check the two builds in my sig.

While putting together the big build and getting impatient waiting on parts, I temporarily pulled the Titan Xps from the smaller build and dropped in a single 2080Ti with the stock cooler and on stock settings. What I've found in most games so far is that, at 4K, the single 2080Ti noticeably out performs the Titan pair in non-SLI games (ie, most UE4 games like PUBG). Maybe it's "only" 30% in some titles, but that's still a massive jump in immersion and playability, and there are other titles where the jump is even larger. In games which support SLI (ie, Destiny 2), the single 2080 Ti matches the performance of the Titan pair but often does it with better looking frames. This is because, even with an SLI title, there is some overhead and inefficiency in trying to execute SLI.

Also keep in mind that my experience above is with a completely stock 2080 Ti compared to a pair of wet Titan Xps. The Titan are at stock clocks but with TDP maxed (120% I think?), and the 2080 Ti ends up thermal throttling due to the insufficient stock cooling.

Another benefit to the 2080 Ti is NVLink. This is a big step up from SLI and may come into play 2 years from now when you're looking to upgrade again. At that point, the boost from NVLink might make the less expensive multi-gpu approach much more effective.

In terms of the headaches from SLI, I haven't experienced any. Pretty much the only issue I've run into is that when motherboards say they support SLI in all slots, they're flat out lying. This meant the Titan build was limited to being a 2 GPU rig if I wanted SLI. Aside from that, everything that was supposed to work worked and I didn't run into any issues with driver updates, etc.
 
2080 Ti price is a rip-off. However dual GPUs just doesn't make sense anymore.

Those benchmarks are an eye opener. There are some games where a single 2080 Ti beats out 2080 Ti SLI and other games where the 2080 Ti SLI is only marginally, like 10 fps better than the single 2080 Ti.

I would expect the scaling is similar for 1080 Ti then. So yeah, just sell your 1080 Ti and get a 2080 Ti if you need the performance increase. Dual 1080 Ti will likely make you regret.

Waiting is always a good option. I want to see what Navi brings to the table and then what Intel will bring as well. Lots of good things down the road and 2080 Ti will inevitably drop. Once the early adopters and pre-order sales are done I feel Nvidia will struggle to find buyers at the $1200 price point.
 
I'm running 2080TI SLI. The main problem, outside the fact that few games use SLI, is that you will be CPU limited. E.g. I have an AMD 2950x, and The Witcher 3 @ 1440p is about 115 fps with a single card, and 120 fps with SLI. On the 1080s, you'll see improvements, but with the 2080TIs, I've found the limitation of my CPU. For 4k, it's a different story.

Mainly, I'm focused on RTX features when they're released. Right now, the 2080TI single card just won't cut it. This is where I think SLI will be most relevant.
 
Man, if only DX12 GPU pooling had panned out and we could have been card agnostic, we wouldn't even need to have this conversation. I remember the day I read that Navi was dropping support for this. I wonder if nVidia or AMD could somehow code all that out and show it working to defeat the chicken/egg problem. As for single card vs. SLI, I would definitely go single card unless I had a lot of time/money to burn.
 
Well I did something stupid - I bought a second 1080 TI, and its the exact model I already owned. Saw it on craigslist for $500 and decided to bite. Sometimes you just can't stop that upgrade itch. With the news of the 2080 TI having some issues, I figured this would hold me off until I decide to jump to the next generation. So far, after playing COD BOPS 4, I saw almost double the frame rate! Going to test some other games soon.
 
For those that care, I did some testing.

System:
CPU: Intel i7 8700K @ 4.7ghz
GPU: Gigabyte Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Turbo SLI (Power Limit 120%, Core 1923mhz, Memory default speed)
Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix Z370-E
RAM: 32 GB DDR4 G.Skill TridentZ RBG 2400mhz
SSD: Samsung 960 EVO 500GB M.2

All games are at 4K with max settings unless specified.

Game Name - Min FPS - Max FPS - Average FPS
Crysis 3 (2xMSAA) - 55 109 78
Battlefield 1 - 89 121 101
PUBG - 54 62 79
COD BLOPS 4 - 96 110 148
Star Wars BF 2 (DX 11) - 46 63 102 (DX12) - 29 48 56
DragonBall Fighter Z (200% Scaling) - 47 60 60 (Even with Vsync off, it won't go past 60).
 
My anecdotal experience says to go with a single 2080Ti. To give you an idea of where I'm coming from, check the two builds in my sig.

While putting together the big build and getting impatient waiting on parts, I temporarily pulled the Titan Xps from the smaller build and dropped in a single 2080Ti with the stock cooler and on stock settings. What I've found in most games so far is that, at 4K, the single 2080Ti noticeably out performs the Titan pair in non-SLI games (ie, most UE4 games like PUBG). Maybe it's "only" 30% in some titles, but that's still a massive jump in immersion and playability, and there are other titles where the jump is even larger. In games which support SLI (ie, Destiny 2), the single 2080 Ti matches the performance of the Titan pair but often does it with better looking frames. This is because, even with an SLI title, there is some overhead and inefficiency in trying to execute SLI.

Also keep in mind that my experience above is with a completely stock 2080 Ti compared to a pair of wet Titan Xps. The Titan are at stock clocks but with TDP maxed (120% I think?), and the 2080 Ti ends up thermal throttling due to the insufficient stock cooling.

Another benefit to the 2080 Ti is NVLink. This is a big step up from SLI and may come into play 2 years from now when you're looking to upgrade again. At that point, the boost from NVLink might make the less expensive multi-gpu approach much more effective.

In terms of the headaches from SLI, I haven't experienced any. Pretty much the only issue I've run into is that when motherboards say they support SLI in all slots, they're flat out lying. This meant the Titan build was limited to being a 2 GPU rig if I wanted SLI. Aside from that, everything that was supposed to work worked and I didn't run into any issues with driver updates, etc.

I would go 1080 TI SLI, as a owner and gamer you can purchase these cards for about 1k in your case 400-500 on ebay maybe less. Tripple A titles will play faster and if you are at 4k even better. I would not buy into the RTX series , it is overpriced, cards dying, Wait a year and see what happens with RTX and sell off the 1080 Ti's and go RTX 2080 TI's for half the price. I have had no issues with SLI , if you are on 4k limited your FPS to what your your monitor can handle, you can always use nvidia inspector , there is no point anyway to go past 85-100 FPS on a 4k monitor , you will just waste electricity.. I have a seamless experience in many titles and make sure you use the High bandwidth bridge , I am running a simple 8700k at 4.9 ghz. I dont see a single video card handling 144hz 144+FPS at 4k for a while.
also make sure you get gsync it is well worth it. After looking at your sig your 7900x will do 16x 16x in sli which will a few more fps and achieve a better benchmark score than a non hedt cpu
 
Last edited:
I'm running 2080TI SLI. The main problem, outside the fact that few games use SLI, is that you will be CPU limited. E.g. I have an AMD 2950x, and The Witcher 3 @ 1440p is about 115 fps with a single card, and 120 fps with SLI. On the 1080s, you'll see improvements, but with the 2080TIs, I've found the limitation of my CPU. For 4k, it's a different story.

Mainly, I'm focused on RTX features when they're released. Right now, the 2080TI single card just won't cut it. This is where I think SLI will be most relevant.

I think SLI runs a form of triple buffering as well doesn't it? It should look smoother than a single card running borderless windowed mode as I hear the triple buffering from Windows 10 borderless adds alot of lag.
 
just got 23096 in fire strike extreme 1080 TI Sli, a stock GTX 2080 TI barely touches 16k
 
just got 23096 in fire strike extreme 1080 TI Sli, a stock GTX 2080 TI barely touches 16k

Who cares about synthetic benchmark when in the real world are totally different scenarios and results?. I was a heavy defender of SLI back in the Kepler days.. however since maxwell I can't recommend enough people to simply avoid any kind of multi gpu solution... on the few tittles that SLI/Xfire work, the scaling isn't anything great or performance may be there in the way of huge FPS gains, but the frame times will be pure piece of shit, so the game will indeed perform better in frame counter but with a choppy experience and slow feelings...

That without take in consideration games where at launch have multigpu support and then after patch it drop the support, or the possibility of add artifacting, flickering, overall issues to games... so someone can spend more time troubleshooting than actually gaming... blah... and this is from trying to use use Xfire and SLI the latest years..
 
Who cares about synthetic benchmark when in the real world are totally different scenarios and results?. I was a heavy defender of SLI back in the Kepler days.. however since maxwell I can't recommend enough people to simply avoid any kind of multi gpu solution... on the few tittles that SLI/Xfire work, the scaling isn't anything great or performance may be there in the way of huge FPS gains, but the frame times will be pure piece of shit, so the game will indeed perform better in frame counter but with a choppy experience and slow feelings...

That without take in consideration games where at launch have multigpu support and then after patch it drop the support, or the possibility of add artifacting, flickering, overall issues to games... so someone can spend more time troubleshooting than actually gaming... blah... and this is from trying to use use Xfire and SLI the latest years..

Who cares?
I pretty much destroy the 2080 TI in SLI buddy
I get none of the issues you described , you are fake news bud
Whoever owns a 1080 TI , do yourself a favor just go SLI its better than a single 2080 TI that costs more. I would not even consider the RTX 2080 until games come out that really support it. Plus with all the 2080 TI dying from what people are reporting , go get yourself two cheap 1080TIs
 
Last edited:
I pretty much destroy the 2080 TI in SLI buddy
I get none of the issues you described , you are fake news bud
Whoever owns a 1080 TI , do yourself a favor just go SLI its better than a single 2080 TI that costs more. I would not even consider the RTX 2080 until games come out that really support it. Plus with all the 2080 TI dying from what people are reporting , go get yourself two cheap 1080TIs

Where SLI is well supported sure. I've been running multiple GPUs for over a decade now and it CAN be great when there support is there but that support simply isn't widespread. I went from 2 1080 Ti FEs to these 2 2080 Ti FEs and sure the cost is high and there's the reports of failure but after 5 weeks now I wouldn't go back. At 4k these 2080 Tis are WAY faster. Maybe not worth the money and for some depending on what they play a second 1080 Ti might be a cost effective way to obtain single 2080 Ti+ plus performance. Again though, that's not going to be anywhere consistently across the board.
 
Where SLI is well supported sure. I've been running multiple GPUs for over a decade now and it CAN be great when there support is there but that support simply isn't widespread. I went from 2 1080 Ti FEs to these 2 2080 Ti FEs and sure the cost is high and there's the reports of failure but after 5 weeks now I wouldn't go back. At 4k these 2080 Tis are WAY faster. Maybe not worth the money and for some depending on what they play a second 1080 Ti might be a cost effective way to obtain single 2080 Ti+ plus performance. Again though, that's not going to be anywhere consistently across the board.

I would do the same but at 2700.00 for two 2080 TI that are decent overclockers, with no games really supporting ray tracing most people in the gaming community will not jump on this right now, especially with the rumor that these cards are dying. On top of that you need to purchase the NVlink where as HB bridges are free with a mobo purchase. I own about 2500 games on steam and my single 1080 TI handles practically 95% of the games at 60fps at 4k no problem where as in SLI i will have the advantage over a single 2080 TI. I still have a warm and fuzzy feeling that when in SLI with my 1080TIs spent under 1k i can get more FPS in a AAA title, I am sure i will jump onto the 2080ti bandwagon when we see a major price job. By then though i might jump onto the next gen RTX cards which i am sure will be better. I am pretty satisfied gaming at 60fps on non SLI games
 
Yeah, single card is best unless you need extreme performance.

Was running a Titan X Pascal for about 1 year, got a lot of 4K gaming out of it. Should be similar to 1080 Ti.

SLI is only really useful if 1 card does not meet your needs.
 
2x EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FTW3 ULTRA
20181110155301_1.jpg
2x Nvidia Titan Xp
20170413073308_1.jpg
 
Go with a single RTX 2080ti.....

Yeah, couple posts back, I posted what I did - bought a secondhand 1080 Ti for SLI goodness. Not regretting the decision at all. Once 2080 Ti's stabilize in price (and maybe once one with a GPU water block is released - want to keep the warranty), I'll probably sell the two 1080 Ti's and go to a single 2080 Ti.
 
1080 TI SLI will be much higher performance (if SLI actually works for that particular application/game) than a single 2080 TI
 
Back
Top