Some Intel Chipset Production Rolled Back to 22nm

AlphaAtlas

[H]ard|Gawd
Staff member
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
1,713
In a highly unusual move, Intel is allegedly rolling back the production of some of their chipsets to 22nm. Earlier this year, Intel suspended H310 chipset production due to 14nm production troubles, while other sites reported that Intel was outsourcing some chipsets to TSMC's 14nm node. But mydrivers.com claims that Intel is manufacturing the "H310C" chipset on their own 22nm node. Photos of the H310C chipset suggest it is significantly larger than the H310, and the website claims it will feature support for Windows 7, which likely an effort to appeal to the Chinese market.

The new respin is expected to replace the older chip on the newer process (confusing, I know) eventually. It's not clear how widespread this move is, or if Intel will take similar action with other chipsets that it builds. Intel has never stated how much of its factory floor is devoted to manufacturing specific hardware, but chipset manufacturing should be a relatively small percentage of the total compared with CPUs, particularly given the size of some of Intel’s largest CPU cores. One thing to keep in mind is that these plans would have been put in place months ago. The news might be new, but the timeline isn't - this has always been part of Intel’s plan to deal with its own 14nm capacity shortage given how long it takes to ramp a part on a different node.
 
Makes sense.

If they wanna mass produce something on the cheap and their 14nm fab is already running near capacity, if you got already established 22nm infrastructure lying around, might as well put it to use.
 
I didn't even realize intel's chipsets are on similar node as their processors. Aren't chipsets from Intel and AMD traditionally a full node or two behind?
 
Any chance we'll get more affordable options? Or I dunno... Atom c3000 series availability any time this century???
 
Yet TSMC is solidly doing 7nm now?

WTF Intel? I guess this is what getting lazy in the face of no perceived competition does. I've been solidly in the Intel camp for a long time (haven't run AMD since AthlonXP).

7nm Zen 2 could be great. If AMD closes the IPC gap I don't see why any enthusiast would go with Intel as no amount of parts binning and crazy clocks will change the perception that they no longer innovating.
 
I don't know which is worse.
Intel going back to 22nm or the Intel fans on here supporting them.

If AMD said they were going back to Bulldozer die size or nVida said they were going back to the GTX650 days, you guys would loose your freaking minds.
Intel can't keep up with the AMD train as far as CPUs and if I worked there I would be ashamed.

Intel, you disappoint!
 
I don't know which is worse.
Intel going back to 22nm or the Intel fans on here supporting them
Meh, I dont think I've seen any post above you support Intel and there general direction. It just makes sense that if you can't supply enough chipsets you should make them in another node if its available. And at least it's not a CPU or GPU. Basically things could be worse (like having a lot of CPU security vulnerabilities for example :p )
 
Back
Top