GlobalFoundries Stops All 7nm Development: Opts To Focus on Specialized Processeses

Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
992
GlobalFoundries on Monday announced an important strategy shift. The contract maker of semiconductors decided to cease development of bleeding edge manufacturing technologies and stop all work on its 7LP (7 nm) fabrication processes, which will not be used for any client. Instead, the company will focus on specialized process technologies for clients in emerging high-growth markets. These technologies will initially be based on the company’s 14LPP/12LP platform and will include RF, embedded memory, and low power features. Because of the strategy shift, GF will cut 5% of its staff as well as renegotiate its WSA and IP-related deals with AMD and IBM. In a bid to understand more what is going on, we sat down with Gary Patton, CTO of GlobalFoundries.

7LP Canned Due to Strategy Shift
GlobalFoundries was on track to tape out its clients’ first chips made using its 7 nm process technology in the fourth quarter of this year, but “a few weeks ago” the company decided to take a drastic strategical turn, says Gary Patton. The CTO stressed that the decision was made not based on technical issues that the company faced, but on a careful consideration of business opportunities the company had with its 7LP platform as well as financial concerns.

patton_7lp_fx-7_briefing_final_4_575px.png


It is noteworthy that when GlobalFoundries first announced its 7LP platform in September 2016, it said that it would start risk production of processors using this technology in early 2018 (PR), which means that the first chips should have been taped out before that. When the company detailed the process in June 2018, it said that it expected to start “volume production ramping in the second half of 2018” (PR), which would be close to impossible if customers taped out their first chips only in Q4.

Generally, it looks like the company had to adjust its roadmap somewhere along the way, moving the start of high-volume manufacturing (HVM) further into 2019. Whether or not these adjustments had any implications on GlobalFoundries is up to debate. Keep in mind that AMD’s first 7 nm product was designed for TSMC’s CLN7FF from the beginning, so the company did not bet on GF’s 7LP in late 2018 anyway, and no rush with the manufacturing technology was needed for GF’s key customer.

Along with the cancellation of the 7LP, GlobalFoundries essentially canned all pathfinding and research operations for 5 nm and 3 nm nodes. The company will continue to work with the IBM Research Alliance (in Albany, NY) until the end of this year, but GlobalFoundries is not sure it makes sense to invest in R&D for ‘bleeding edge’ nodes given that it does not plan to use them any time soon. The manufacturer will continue to cooperate with IMEC, which works on a broader set of technologies that will be useful for GF’s upcoming specialized fabrication processes, but obviously it will refocus its priorities there as well (more on GF’s future process technologies later in this article).

So, the key takeaway here is that while the 7LP platform was a bit behind TSMC’s CLN7FF when it comes to HVM – and GlobalFoundries has never been first to market with leading edge bulk manufacturing technologies anyway – there were no issues with the fabrication process itself. Rather there were deeper economic reasons behind the decision.

wafer_of_chips_with_5nm_silicon_nanosheet_transistors_575px.jpg


Economic Reasons Behind the Move
As we noted in our article covering GlobalFoundries's new CEO hire earlier this year, one of the things that the former chief exec Sanjay Jha failed to do was to make the company profitable. His key tasks were to increase GlobalFoundries’s sales, streamline the company in general, and ensure that it executes its roadmap.

To address the needs of the manufacturer’s traditional key client (AMD) and ensure that his company was competitive against other contract makers of semiconductors, he licensed the 14LPP fabrication technology from Samsung Foundry. That strategy worked well. With Sunjay Jha at the helm, GlobalFoundries has managed to land a variety of new customers and increase its sales of semiconductor wafers from approximately $4.121 billion in 2013 to $6.176 billion in 2017. Besides, the foundry’s leading-edge Fab 8, which has been processing wafers using exclusively 14LPP process technology for well over 1.5 years now, is running at full capacity.

GF_sales_575px.png


To ensure that GlobalFoundries remains competitive against Samsung Foundry and TSMC in the long run, Sunjay Jha obtained IP and development teams from IBM (along with two fabs and a lot of obligations), and poured in billions of dollars in development of the 7LP fabrication technology platform. The latter would include three generations of manufacturing processes and, possibly, a custom high-performance technology available exclusively to IBM. While everything appeared to proceed smoothly with the 1st Gen 7 nm (DUV only), the 2nd Gen 7 nm (with EUV used for non-critical layers, such as padding) still needed some additional development investments, whereas the 3rd Gen 7 nm (with intensive usage of EUV) required even more money for development and could require installation of additional EUV equipment. Meanwhile, there were two things to consider.

First. If GlobalFoundries kicks off production using the 1st Gen 7 nm fabrication process, it would have needed to cure all of its teething troubles and offer its clients a roadmap forward. The latter would have included 2nd Gen and 3rd Gen 7 nm, but nothing stops there. Customers would have asked for 5 nm and then for 3 nm nodes. Meanwhile, you cannot tell your clients that you are packing after a certain node and then hope that this node will be a success (the same is true for DUV-only 1st Gen 7 nm).

Second. Development of leading-edge process technologies is extremely expensive. Every new node requires billions of dollars of investments. The latter are eventually transferred to each chip the company makes, so to maintain the R&D cost of each chip at a reasonable level, foundries need to produce more chips. To make more chips, they need to either run multiple fabs that use the same process technology (these are going to cost $10+ billion in the EUV era), or build giant fabs that process a gargantuan number of wafers (these are going to cost $20+ billion in the EUV era). Meanwhile, GlobalFoundries has only one leading-edge fab featuring capacity of 60,000 wafer starts per month. As a result, either GlobalFoundries has to increase the R&D ingredient in the cost of each wafer it processes and become uncompetitive against rivals, or retain it at a current level and decrease its ROI (return on investment).

dji_0114_575px.jpg


Meanwhile, having spent well over $20 billion on GlobalFoundries over the last 10 years, Mubadala, the owner of the company, is not inclined to lose more money or invest tens of billions hoping to become profitable one day. The investor wants GlobalFoundries to stop bleeding and start generating profits.

“The culture of [our investments], the ones I’ve been involved with, was about accumulating assets and then just maintaining it,” said Khaldoon Al Mubarak, CEO of GlobalFoundries, said in an interview with Bloombergearlier this year. “The shift that has happened over the last couple of years, that I’ve tried to push at Mubadala today, is a monetization strategy that makes sense, not with a view to cash out but with a view to reinvest.”

Gary Patton admits that GlobalFoundries never planned to be a leading producer of 7-nm chips in terms of volumes. Furthermore, the company has been seeing increasing adoption of its 14LPP/12LP technologies by designers of various emerging devices, which fills the Fab 8 in, leaving less step-and-scan systems for 7LP products.

Without another big fab, it would be impossible to make any new leading-edge process technology competitive against Samsung and TSMC due to aforementioned reasons. Meanwhile, building a new fab (or even expanding the Fab 8 with another cleanroom module, which is something that GF considered several years ago) and creating another node or two would require another $10 – $15 billion from Mubadala, which is not inclined to invest just now. As a result, the GlobalFoundries decided to switch entirely to specialized process technologies for emerging high-growth markets. This strategic shift enables it to reduce spending on R&D, slowdown procurement of new equipment, reduce its workforce by 5% (most of which will be in Malta), and potentially avoid direct competition against the aforementioned contract makers of semiconductors. But what exactly does GlobalFoundries plan to do? Let’s find out in our next sections.

Source: https://www.anandtech.com/show/13277/globalfoundries-stops-all-7nm-development
 
Hasn't AMD been trying to get out of the Wafer Supply Agreement (WSA) since forever?

This is a godsend for AMD.

Yup, every couple of years it is always AMD renegotiating terms with GlobalFoundries and during those times, AMD was in a financially weak position. Hopefully this time will be different given AMDs current financial position.
 
So for us not in the know. Will we see 7nm TR 3? Also, what does that mean for the next generation of thread ripper? Or just the next generation of amd cpu period?
 
So for us not in the know. Will we see 7nm TR 3? Also, what does that mean for the next generation of thread ripper? Or just the next generation of amd cpu period?

Its being made by TSMC and will be there 7nm process. So for us nothing has changed other then GF has confirmed they wont be moving to 7nm for now which likely frees AMD from having to buy wafers from GF, but I am not sure on that part.
 
Its being made by TSMC and will be there 7nm process. So for us nothing has changed other then GF has confirmed they wont be moving to 7nm for now which likely frees AMD from having to buy wafers from GF, but I am not sure on that part.

I doubt GF will let AMD off the hook that easily, but I can see AMD asking for a reduce quota on its WSA.
 
Its being made by TSMC and will be there 7nm process. So for us nothing has changed other then GF has confirmed they wont be moving to 7nm for now which likely frees AMD from having to buy wafers from GF, but I am not sure on that part.

I doubt GF will let AMD off the hook that easily, but I can see AMD asking for a reduce quota on its WSA.

From the sixth amendment to the wafer supply agreement:

For purposes of calculating the [****] Quarterly [****] Waiver Payments, any AMD [****] Wafer volumes that were included in AMD’s Binding Forecasts to FoundryCo and were accepted by FoundryCo in writing, but that AMD subsequently purchased from [****] solely because FoundryCo subsequently informed AMD in writing that FoundryCo would not make the necessary capacity available to AMD (“Decommitted Wafers”), will be treated as if they had been purchased from FoundryCo rather than from [****]
 
I know this is good news for AMD but it makes me a little sad. GloFo was one of the few large Semiconductor foundries in the US and now all that work will go to Taiwan. I know AMD has to do what's right for it's business, just makes me sad that all of AMD's old foundries can't hack it.
 
I know this is good news for AMD but it makes me a little sad. GloFo was one of the few large Semiconductor foundries in the US and now all that work will go to Taiwan. I know AMD has to do what's right for it's business, just makes me sad that all of AMD's old foundries can't hack it.
They will still produce 12/14nm finfet . The amount of money they need to spend on a process which they are not leading (meaning yields have to be acceptable (look at Intel 10nm))will make things more difficult for them if other(s) do it better.

If Glofo have a process which they are leading and can expect to have orders from everyone then the initial investment is not a big problem.
We see the numbers in nano meter go down but we don't see the amount of money attached to that.

I'm still expecting that if AMD is going to gain significant ground in the end they would need Global Foundries one way or another relying on TSMC or Samsung or both might not suffice.
 
Last edited:
I'm confident TSMC can produce for AMD. They've been in the semiconductor biz for a very long time obviously. But I suppose to your point if AMD's has runaway success with 7nm, can GloFo produce the same chips? I don't know if that'll be possible.

Two different foundries aren't always capable of producing the exact same design. GloFo has clearly thrown in the towel on 7nm.
 
Maybe AMD might want to go back into the fab business after their position strengthens... Seems like the outsourcing craze in production only works if you are on the downsize.
 
Maybe AMD might want to go back into the fab business after their position strengthens... Seems like the outsourcing craze in production only works if you are on the downsize.
Not sure they want to compete against tsmc in yet another multi-billion dollar industry that's very mature at this point.
 
Maybe AMD might want to go back into the fab business after their position strengthens... Seems like the outsourcing craze in production only works if you are on the downsize.
They shouldn't, going back to the fab business requires a lot of capital which requires AMD to take on loans with no guarantee payout. It is better for AMD to remain fabless to give them flexibility to pick and choose semiconductor manufacturer.
 
I'm confident TSMC can produce for AMD. They've been in the semiconductor biz for a very long time obviously. But I suppose to your point if AMD's has runaway success with 7nm, can GloFo produce the same chips? I don't know if that'll be possible.

Two different foundries aren't always capable of producing the exact same design. GloFo has clearly thrown in the towel on 7nm.
I'm talking long term not short term. What is beyond 7nm , AMD can't grow at a rate that would dwarf other more important clients at TSMC , if that time comes AMD would have to take a back seat to Apple and others. That is why Global Foundries still has a part to play in the future of AMD. Remember when GF had to purchase the 14nm process from Samsung to be able to get going?
 
Back
Top