Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
10 years and now it's offensive? That is BS.10 year old tweets......
And yet they have a robot of a president that says he likes to grab women by the pussy.....
I bet 45 is happy about the news.
Common sense?why do people keep saying it's OK because it was from 10 years ago??...he was 41 years old at the time...he was not a teenager or kid at the time...he was an adult...of course he should be fired...he's representing a company- Disney...his movie career is probably over with now
Common sense?
If people knew about it then, why now are they whining?
They didn't? Well since you have inside information tell us why they did not back then but do now?it's obvious they didn't know about it then...he only became really well known after the first Guardians movie
This. A lot of people here are acting like he was just making edgy jokes, which some of it was, but at one point, he talked about viewing a video with "pubescent" children touching themselves and said he came all over his own face watching it, joking that pedophiles probably got a massive release with that video. Maybe there was a different context to what he said, but people are comparing his words to a rape joke or Trump's, "if you're rich, women let you do anything... Grab them by the pussy (laughter)"Gunn is a closet pedo. A normal person would not have posted what he said. As a father I wouldn't let him near my kids.
why do people keep saying it's OK because it was from 10 years ago??...he was 41 years old at the time...he was not a teenager or kid at the time...he was an adult...of course he should be fired...he's representing a company- Disney...his movie career is probably over with now
What, people cant change if they're adults? Not to say hes really changed but out of the few tweets I saw the only one really suspect to me was the one about kids touching his special place. On the surface without any context, that one is umm like wtf.
Honestly, this seems like a whole lot of nothing made into something all because one w/e winger disagrees with someones opinion but instead of just disagreeing they went on a witch hunt.
why do people keep saying it's OK because it was from 10 years ago?
But you are using logic, some people can't handle that!If you read Tweets by some of his...supporters, whether or not they say they are...like Justin Roiland (of Rick and Morty fame), you start to understand their logic. Roiland Tweeted a link to a scientific study explaining that life goes through 7-year cycles along with his comment, "I remember hearing that people change every 7 years. Both mentally and physically. I am certainly a different person now than I was 7 years ago."
So you did a clinical interview with him and found this out? I guess you can't say anything because of Dr/Patient confidentiality.We can go on and on about SJW , blah blah blah
Fact of the matter is, your past always comes back to haunt you. And you should never say those types of things, ESPECIALLY on Social Media.
Obviously the guy has a mental illness.
So you did a clinical interview with him and found this out? I guess you can't say anything because of Dr/Patient confidentiality.
So you did a clinical interview with him and found this out? I guess you can't say anything because of Dr/Patient confidentiality.
If they were just crass jokes, then he needs to come out in apology and defense of Rossane Bar.
Won't happen.
With the liberal mind, it's always rules for thee and not for me. And then suddenly they're the last stalwart defenders of the freedom of speech when it inevitably bites them in the ass.
Also, his tweets aren't what got him fired. This is: https://i.redd.it/rjx4qbfjm6b11.png (Found on his own website. Oh and if you weren't aware of who his friend huston huddleston is, look him up. lol)
Dude's a fucking open pedophile, and yet there are still people here defending him. Batshit crazy.
Seems less risky than saying something tasteless or out of context that could potentially get you shitcanned years later when the social winds change.Man I wonder if not having a social media history makes a person a risky hire or labeled "unsocial" in this day and age.
Christ. Disney's decision was dumb, but stop calling them "10 year old" tweets. I saw offensive (generally; one reason I don't consider it as big a deal is that they weren't specifically targeted) tweets dated as late as 2013. That's FIVE years, not 10. It also coincides with him getting hired for the first GotG movie, so the "I was a different person" excuse looks a little less plausible; it seems more like he realized that if he continued his unfunny, gross tweeting then he would risk losing his high-paying job.They lost a good director over 10 year old tweets, ugh. The next Guardians movie is gonna suuuuck.
Dude. What russian troll farm did you crawl out of? Yikes. Your only posts are about you in Dallas and extremist bs.Man, the investors better step in and get these SJW types out of Disney before they sink it. Firing a successful director for some trashy jokes that sound like something Jim Norton would say 10 years ago is a terrible idea.
Edit: They should take their queue from the NFL. Oh, you killed a dude? Well, can you catch a 20 yard fade in the endzone? Yeah? How does 20 million a year sound?
what SJW safe space did you crawl out of? tossing around "Russian troll" like its the end all new term cause Nazi got ineffective.Dude. What russian troll farm did you crawl out of? Yikes. Your only posts are about you in Dallas and extremist bs.
But why 10 years later? That is the question.Disney built his empire catering to the "youth" and "family" genres of entertainment. Disney today still has almost all of its focus on those same genres. I'm not surprised, in the least, that Disney would shit-can Gunn over his 10 year old tweets (pun intended) about perverse sexual activities involving minors, even if they were jokes. Way too much at stake for Disney: parents continuing to spend money on their kids for the Disney brand.
This. My guess is more damaging info is going to come out. Disney is just cutting its ties for its own image sake. They don't like to cut one of their own kind unless it gets public.they need to interview the kids he worked with in his movies...probably will find out more sick stuff...
The amazing part of this story is that all of these self-proclaimed adults, some posting they're at least 40 years old, have lived this long without knowing Disney's iron fist over it's employees. Disney fires janitors and Disney Bank tellers for posting drunken photos on Facebook. This doesn't have anything to do with "SWJ" or liberals or any other bullshit anyone drudges up in to explain the "unexplainable" firing of a guy posting about pedophilia!Disney built his empire catering to the "youth" and "family" genres of entertainment. Disney today still has almost all of its focus on those same genres. I'm not surprised, in the least, that Disney would shit-can Gunn over his 10 year old tweets (pun intended) about perverse sexual activities involving minors, even if they were jokes. Way too much at stake for Disney: parents continuing to spend money on their kids for the Disney brand.
Small difference in time by about 10 years. Rosanne's was recent.The amazing part of this story is that all of these self-proclaimed adults, some posting they're at least 40 years old, have lived this long without knowing Disney's iron fist over it's employees. Disney fires janitors and Disney Bank tellers for posting drunken photos on Facebook. This doesn't have anything to do with "SWJ" or liberals or any other bullshit anyone drudges up in to explain the "unexplainable" firing of a guy posting about pedophilia!
Also, unless Gunn is complaining about being fired are you guys just straw-manning him that he's shocked and wants a double-standard applied between his and Rosanne's demise?