vincentsixtysix
Weaksauce
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2017
- Messages
- 82
SONY 900E ,
I think rtings.com has given poor ratings to this monitor -- a total of , as a 7.6 -- for a pc monitor. and i can see why that would be bc the Input lag is in the 30's.
so gamers might not find this tv useful, but for those who are after productivity work/ and just use read excels and heavy texts filled webpages all day . -this monitor would be even better than the 800e or the c7 ( both of which have a higher ratings )
this display on 900e should result in a much finer sharper images for a pc monitor than the other options because
a) it has full array direct LED lit , whereas most are including the 720e/800e are side or edge lit panels.
b) its a VA panel so the constrast will be about 3000:1 x vs 1000:1 IPS as on the 720e
c) it is PWM Free
d) Brightness is 3X that of the 720e as well !
So Overall, I think the ratings for this as a PC monitor is Very underrated.... Any thoughts ?
Its currently 900 $ for the 49 inch version which is 1/2 cheaper than any OLED option.
I think rtings.com has given poor ratings to this monitor -- a total of , as a 7.6 -- for a pc monitor. and i can see why that would be bc the Input lag is in the 30's.
so gamers might not find this tv useful, but for those who are after productivity work/ and just use read excels and heavy texts filled webpages all day . -this monitor would be even better than the 800e or the c7 ( both of which have a higher ratings )
this display on 900e should result in a much finer sharper images for a pc monitor than the other options because
a) it has full array direct LED lit , whereas most are including the 720e/800e are side or edge lit panels.
b) its a VA panel so the constrast will be about 3000:1 x vs 1000:1 IPS as on the 720e
c) it is PWM Free
d) Brightness is 3X that of the 720e as well !
So Overall, I think the ratings for this as a PC monitor is Very underrated.... Any thoughts ?
Its currently 900 $ for the 49 inch version which is 1/2 cheaper than any OLED option.
Last edited: