![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
You understand statistics much? 6 links prove my point, which means 6 different scenes, 6 different scenarios, 6 confirmation of my point from 6 different sources, while you only have 1 link which means 1 scene, 1 test scenario, 1 confirmation for your point. 6 is larger and statistically more accurate and representative than 1, period. Math 101.
You definitely should rest your weak ass case. As others have mentioned you cherry picked without a wider net and assumed it was enough.
Nope, simply that PCGH tested a different scene and found the FuryX lagging hard there. I am sure if enough sites tested the game, the pattern will emerge.
???!!
You want a wider net? Here you go:
It is obvious you have an agenda. You skip around sites and choose the worst ones and then only mention the ones (resolutions and such) that fit in that narrow window. Also keep in mind you aren't showing a trend, say of a declining pattern, only that the position of the Fury is where it is. The Fury wasn't besting the 980Ti at launch and still isn't and that is all you THINK you have proven.
I don't skip nothing, I present numbers and facts, skipping and ignoring evidence is your agenda not mine. Don't go blindly defending a myth you invented, look at the evidence objectively.
It was 15% behind, not miles behind, and it wasn't no faster than GTX 980 like it is now in the dozens of games presented.
Statistically all of your posts are biased for the opposite vendor in which forum you are posting ...
So where is the link to you condemning or proving Kepler is aging badly? Or is your silence for sale?
Most of the links reference both 1080p and 1440p actually.
)
That is not [H]ardOCP testing plus dated being done in August with crap drivers. Still, 1070 performance does seem to be about right.
Honestly I am not expecting much as the general number of VR is Nvidia based (not biased) right now. Does make one wonder what AMD was talking about with the 480 and mainstream VR. They had to see the games and how they were based when they made that statement. Of course a Vulkan-esque VR would easily allow that to happen, but as of now we don't have it yet. Is Forza 7 bringing VR? I think AMD would do wonderfully there.
Croteam with the Serious Engines runs excellently in VR for AMD/RTG cards - Hopefully Kyle will get some play time again with VR to get us up to speed.
Tech is what it is at the start. Even then VR is pretty impressive, on NVidia cards only sadly.
Dirt 4 is not bound by VRAM, it also favors AMD GPUs heavily, especially without the use of MSAA.
