Why?
Aside from being obviously political?
Look, give me a newspaper or journal. A primary source with a declared journalistic standard.
You missed the point entirely.
I suggest you read the memo, think, then come to your own conclusions rather than regurgitating someone else's summary of the document. Your interpretations of what the document contains would seem to indicate that you haven't even read it.
From the man himself:
"I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes"
He's actually "simply stating" women are inferior at coding because biology. He doesn't have the balls to come out and say that (or stupidly thought blunting the argument would be more convincing) and couches it with "distribution" and "part" but that's dressing on a turd sandwich.
Then there's this:
"For heterosexual romantic relationships, men are more strongly judged by status and women by beauty. Again, this has biological origins"
And this:
"women spend more money than men"
Last edited: