![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
OK here is one variable influencing all core use, those Cinebench results at the AMD Event involved using the standard cooler that is defined by Intel and AMD; so for AMD it is the Wraith Cooler and Intel it was the bxts13a.
While neither are great it is probably fair to say the Wraith cooler is better.
Anyone know what the max TDP cooling the BXTS13A can do?
Checking measurements for the 6900K all cores seriously stressed up to normal boost (3.7GHz) uses 136.5 watts (accurate as possible measured by Tom's hardware).
All cores 4GHz OC uses 148 watts, while 4.3GHz OC was insane at 209.5 watts.
The watts-stress would be less for Cinebench.
My thoughts originally was the 1800X sustaining 10% more clocks than 6900K both all cores and still possible with some throttling due to both coolers, which would make the SMT gain align more with clocks in that situation and SMT having parity with Broadwell (still incredibly good if they managed this but fits expectations better from engineering world).
The extact spec for all systems used for event data is in the last of the presentation slides here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/11143...or-under-330-preorder-today-on-sale-march-2nd
They also confirm Intel Turbo Boost hitting 3.7GHz and 4GHz (we can assume single core results) for 6900K, and 3.6GHz and 3.8GHz (assume single core) for 6800K.
So all down to how much the coolers influenced throttling and multithread (with SMT) Cinebench scores that needs possibly a little allowance (I doubt too much individually as both these were not overclocked and both would had limitations albeit I would say the Intel stock BXTS13A the most).
Cheers
While neither are great it is probably fair to say the Wraith cooler is better.
Anyone know what the max TDP cooling the BXTS13A can do?
Checking measurements for the 6900K all cores seriously stressed up to normal boost (3.7GHz) uses 136.5 watts (accurate as possible measured by Tom's hardware).
All cores 4GHz OC uses 148 watts, while 4.3GHz OC was insane at 209.5 watts.
The watts-stress would be less for Cinebench.
My thoughts originally was the 1800X sustaining 10% more clocks than 6900K both all cores and still possible with some throttling due to both coolers, which would make the SMT gain align more with clocks in that situation and SMT having parity with Broadwell (still incredibly good if they managed this but fits expectations better from engineering world).
The extact spec for all systems used for event data is in the last of the presentation slides here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/11143...or-under-330-preorder-today-on-sale-march-2nd
They also confirm Intel Turbo Boost hitting 3.7GHz and 4GHz (we can assume single core results) for 6900K, and 3.6GHz and 3.8GHz (assume single core) for 6800K.
So all down to how much the coolers influenced throttling and multithread (with SMT) Cinebench scores that needs possibly a little allowance (I doubt too much individually as both these were not overclocked and both would had limitations albeit I would say the Intel stock BXTS13A the most).
Cheers
Last edited:
