![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
My point is there is no evidence it truly gimps them in any way. there are not enough games properly coded in either dx12 or vulkan to show a performance hit and many benchmarks are showing some small gains and even some large ones in doom plus my own testing showed it either ran the same or a tad better.
There is plenty of proof that Nvidia does Asynchronous Compute just fine
, DX 12 does not require you able to do both Asynchronous Compute + GRAPHICS at the same time. AMD has a hardware feature that allows it with DX 12, which is a good feature if used properly to keep the GPU busy/more efficient. The bottom line is what performance you get in the end on a given application, performance/cost and finally perf/w.Sorry but where is this proof? I have seen plenty of proof with DX12 showing no to negative improvement. And the discussion I was referring to had nothing to do with DX12 spec but his assertion Nvidia could do asynchronous compute and alluding to it being enabled in hardware by stating it was supported (common deflecting of facts too many here take liberties with).There is plenty of proof that Nvidia does Asynchronous Compute just fine
Let us pretend for the sake of argument you are right and nvidia does not support a feature that virtually no games use (less than 1% let us say), so what? the raw performance coming out of nvidia cards more than makes up for badly optimized games and in not one game except AOTS does an AMD card show better performance than nvidias top two cards. Your retort will be "but dx12 and vulkan are the future nvidia will hurt then", and you would be right those api are very much the future but we can not predict how good or badly nvidia cards will do on future games on those api when so far the only games that use them are poorly coded and implemented after the fact.
Do you get paid for this? Really? I mean it. So you make the post claiming unfounded points. Then when it is obvious that you made unfounded points you resort to demeaning the basis of your original point as to make it seem meaningless. I made no claims to whether Nvidia will have or not future gains nor their current position nor any doomsday prophecies. Just made the statement that Nvidia can not do asynchronous compute in the context of Compute+graphics simultaneously/asynchronously/at the same time without context switching.
Now you are just being obtuse. 99% of the time when posters mention asynchronous compute they do in fact mean compute+graphics simultaneously/asynchronously/at the same time without context switching. You know this. I have seen you in these discussions. But I guess since you now have a 1070...
I don't assume and async compute is not compute+graphics at all. AMD just added a feature on top of that which can be useful.
I wouldn't mind getting paid for posts. Kidding aside I never made unfounded points, all i said is that nvidia said they have async compute, no one can prove otherwise, and lastly there is little proof that their implementation if different matters at this point.
That's a really good question. The game is gorgeous and considering how bad id tech 5 was I was worried for this title. They really worked the magic voodoo in id tech 6.
What resolution is that at?6700k and 1080
Here's one of the heavier areas I know about in the game
You forgot the part where you are supposed to show the 1080 doing worse on Vulkan since that is what the internet says it does.6700k and 1080
Here's one of the heavier areas I know about in the game
it could be some type of performance ceiling in the game engine the 1080 is hitting.
What OSD is that ? CPU, GPU usage with FPS counter.6700k and 1080
Here's one of the heavier areas I know about in the game
That is the built in one in the game
What do you mean id tech 5 was terrible? That engine pushed 1080p 60fps on the Xbox 360 and PS3 and looked great doing it. Same thing running Wolfenstein New Order and that also looked great and ran great.
The problem is that we do not know if it is a driver-pascal related issue, or settings including both AA and shadows, or the zone Guru3D tested.
Texture pop and load times, also the super texture format made everything look bland and fairly low res. Now those are certainly good games, but in the hierarchy of great id engines id tech 5 doesn't rank high IMO.
I was reading about an issue with latency affecting some users of the 1070/1080s. Seemed like the issue you're speaking of.
