ManofGod
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2007
- Messages
- 12,864
Nope. Across the last three generations of processors, high end i5s with model numbers close to the i7 versions are so similar in most use cases as to not be worth the price unless you absolutely benefit from the extra cpu features... like hyperthreading. This would be along the lines of Video Editing... and even then, if you're already sitting on a high end i5, I wouldn't bother upgrading within the same generation. It's only really worth getting the i7 if it's for a new build in these sorts of cases.
There's a reason a lot of people held onto the Sandy Bridge i5 2500k and i7 2600k processors for a reaaaaallly long time. Ivy, Haswell, Broadwell all didn't provide that much performance increase for the cost... and if you figure bang for the buck, it's even worse to go from a i5 6500 to an i7 6700.
Stick with what you've got. It's good for at least another 5 to 10 years. Seriously. I'll probably be keeping my Haswell Xeon 1231 for about as long.
This is absolutely correct! I think the 6700k is nice but, I sold off my setup and went back to an FX 8300, Asus 970 Pro Aura and 16GB of HyperX 1866 DDR 3 ram. (I spent only $237 after receiving the $50 credit on my American Express card from newegg.) When I went from the FX 8350 to 6700k, I saw little to no difference since I game a 4k but, even at 1440p, the difference was not $700 for a board, processor and ram.
Also, I only maybe gamed for about 4 hours on my computer in 8 months which made it even less worth it. Stick with your 6500, you will be fine. If you truly need to make use of more power, go with a minimum 5820k setup. (Oh, and it feels good to stick $290 back into savings and still have a fast computer.)