Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wouldn't be surprised if NVIDIA had a driver update around launch that fixes this.
fixes what?
His video card prejudices.
Those graphics look really amazing, although it looks like my 2 280xs should be able to manage 1080p reasonably well. It's been a long time since I've seen screenshots and wanted to buy a game just because of how it looks!
Still waiting for reviews though. Oh wait, they're running an open beta. I'm getting in on that action for sure.
His video card prejudices.
PCGH has their results up.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Star-...950/Specials/Beta-Technik-Benchmarks-1173656/
Still the only site properly labeling the cards they use.
PCGH has their results up.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Star-...950/Specials/Beta-Technik-Benchmarks-1173656/
Still the only site properly labeling the cards they use.
Wouldn't be surprised if NVIDIA had a driver update around launch that fixes this.
That is the driver Guru3D used to benchmarking.
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/star-wars-battlefront-beta-vga-graphics-performance-benchmarks,1.html
The guru3d review already uses that driver...
His video card prejudices.
That's interesting. Frame times were significantly worse on the 980 compared to the 290x.
The original post was referring to the game's official release date (November-something). As for "fixing" the game, he's probably comparing it to BF4's performance. No doubt AMD & EA have spent the last 2 years optimizing GCN to the limits for this game, it clearly shows in the benchmarks.
It's too bad they only use AMD GPUs over there at EA, otherwise we might have got some Maxwell optimizations. Nvidia needs to work on their outreach program!
Electronic Arts' recommendation of a GeForce GTX 970 will give gamers 60 frames per second and above at 1920x1080, with medium detail settings, in the Walker Assault's 40-player battles. Higher detail levels will require more powerful GPUs, such as the GeForce GTX 980 and 980 Ti, as will higher resolutions.
Wouldn't be surprised if NVIDIA had a driver update around launch that fixes this.
fixes what?
His video card prejudices.
Isn't this game when you boil it down bf4 with blasters and light sabers? I would think it would perform similarly.
Ohes noes, my GTX 960 is slower than the AMD equivalent in a beta! It's the end of the world as we know it! They'll optimize the drivers shortly, just like they did with Battlefield 4.
Until then, I'm fine. Last time I checked 46fps all ultra was plenty playable.
Pretty easy to OC a 960 as well, I haven't met one that didn't do at least 1500MHz
Pretty easy to OC a 960 as well, I haven't met one that didn't do at least 1500MHz
Wouldn't be surprised if NVIDIA had a driver update around launch that fixes this.
Ohes noes, my GTX 960 is slower than the AMD equivalent in a beta! It's the end of the world as we know it! They'll optimize the drivers shortly, just like they did with Battlefield 4.
Until then, I'm fine. Last time I checked 46fps all ultra was plenty playable.
Everybody's in a fuss over DX12, so the Battlefront benchmarks are getting more play. I remember the initial BF4 benchmarks but at the time nobody really cared because it was an AMD game in the first place.Is that a lowly HD 7870 rolling all over the GTX 670, even though the card is 20% faster in almost every other game? Why yes!
Is that a R9 290X rolling all over the Titan, a card that normally matches it? why, yes!
No you're confused, Nvidia cripples drivers over time.Performance has increased about 35% for the GTX 770, and 45% for the GTX 760 since then, while AMD has improved about 20%
Kinda makes me wonder what changed from BF4 to Battlefront to cause Nvidia to lose so much performance or vice versa.
Impressive AMD results, mainly the 290x/290 besting the GTX980/GTX970 respectively...
Why don't the reviewers use non-reference cards for main reviews. I don't see many people on this forum using a reference 980 GTX Ti.