GTA V 60 Frames-Per-Second PC Trailer

umm....was the only actual gameplay when the character walked outside the house. Looked good though. I had steam refund my monies for my pre-order. Gonna wait till price drops in the Fall.
 
umm....was the only actual gameplay when the character walked outside the house. Looked good though. I had steam refund my monies for my pre-order. Gonna wait till price drops in the Fall.

With GTA5, across all consoles -- they have never used prerendered cutscenes... it's alll been done live by the game engine. After seeing what was possible on the Xbox one, i have no doubt this game is going to deliver fully on PC.

I enjoyed it on 360, it was beautiful on the Xbox One, can't wait for the PC version.
 
Compared to the other trailers, something feels kinda strange with this one. Not in a bad way, mind you...it just lacks the "professional" touch that their other trailers have. I think this might have been made with the in-game editing tools that's coming with the PC version, but they didn't mention it.
 
Would not get to excited the recommended requirements are
Video Card: NVIDIA GTX 660 2GB / AMD HD7870 2GB link

Something about directx 10 too. :rolleyes:
 
Would not get to excited the recommended requirements are
Video Card: NVIDIA GTX 660 2GB / AMD HD7870 2GB link

Something about directx 10 too. :rolleyes:

Just because it doesn't recommend bleeding edge hardware specs doesn't mean it won't be fantastic on the high end. I won't judge anything until I see some gameplay reviews for the PC.
 
i have the PS3 version, just dont see how they can justify the price, yaknow years later, and it NOT be a new game
 
Got the PS3 version. Loved it but stopped playing the single player about halfway through so I could finish it on the PC. Pre-bought it from GMG when they gave me a $20 off code. I can't wait for the 14th... only to find it's been delayed until July.
 
i have the PS3 version, just dont see how they can justify the price, yaknow years later, and it NOT be a new game

Well I've never played any GTA game ever, so I could justify $60 for this since it is an entirely new experience for me.

As far as system demands go, it's pretty obvious this aint no FarCry, but it doesnt look so dated that is qualifies as "too old to play". I just bought a GTX 970 so I aint exactly itching to play this game but it might still be worth it, assuming I havent spoiled it from watching so many youtube vids.
 
Would not get to excited the recommended requirements are
Video Card: NVIDIA GTX 660 2GB / AMD HD7870 2GB link

Something about directx 10 too. :rolleyes:

GTA games, historically, have never been at the cutting-edge of graphical quality. This one will be no different - so I wouldn't expect a free-roam with Crysis 3 graphics this generation.

That being said, I think it looks pretty good. In an open world game like this a lot of work goes into manually tuning LOD levels and distance culling to keep a balance between close-up detail and overall draw distance. Also, 2GB of recommended gpu ram sounds reasonable - the ps4 and xbone OS's eat up around 3 of their 8 gigs, and probably half of the remaining is used internally by the game engine leaving 2-3 gigs for gpu resources.

Also, the DX10 support doesn't sound far-fetched - DX11 is in many ways an extension of the DX10 feature set so we've seen a few developers support this branch for older hardware. The lack of DX9 support I think confirms this, as they would need an entirely separate output module to handle the older path. They probably could've ported their ps3/360 renderer for a start on a DX9 pc path, but considering how most of the pc base has moved on to DX11 they probably decided against that to save time.
 
I've been holding out to play it on PC. My roommate plays it somewhat frequently on his 360 and the extent of my experience with it is that I drove a car around on the runway and gave the controller back to him. There's a lot to appreciate with games of this scale and I think it'll be quite a good time.
 
Would not get to excited the recommended requirements are
Video Card: NVIDIA GTX 660 2GB / AMD HD7870 2GB link

Something about directx 10 too. :rolleyes:
It supports both DX 10 and 11.

About the sys. reqs., it seems devs can't win nowadays. Either they ship games that recommend a 780 and get flamed for being "lazy", or they create games that can run on a 9800 GT and receive hate for not pushing the limits of the master race machines. I thought one of the advantages of choosing the PC platform was the graphical flexibility of games?
 
saw a bunch of low resolution textures.

That car they were sitting in parked right there.... the sheet metal was nasty
 
looks great, but i thought this was gonna be in 4k 60fps.

either way, cant wait to run it at 4k, i know its gonna be gorgeous.
 
Hmmm, video doesn't play at higher res on Firefox... same issue with 60FPS in youtube as well? Firefox doesn't support it?
 
amazeballs! Now as long as it runs decent and doesn't have all of the hangups most console to PC ports have, i'm in!
 
mod support.. either Rockstar adds it or someone will eventually add it... I'd rather Rockstar do it than someone else..but it will eventually happen..
 
It's still a new game on the PC platform. It cost me $70 Canadian. Figured why the hell not. I like the GTA games, and I haven't played GTAV at all. I'm use to waiting a year or more for it GTA games to show up on PC. This is normal now. It looks like Rockstar did a good job this time round. Totally felt burned by GTA4. Time will tell. No biggie, I made my choice to pre-purchase. It will still give me hundreds of play hours.
 
OH MY GOD.

Is it possible to cu* and shi* your pants at the same time because I just did.

At least I admit it.
 
About the sys. reqs., it seems devs can't win nowadays. **SNIP** games?
That about sums it up for the most.

It is not as simple as yesteryear when you can get away with limiting how high the mips go or what LOD`s draw at X distance, (try to) hide imperfections with fog and draw-distance..
 
About the sys. reqs., it seems devs can't win nowadays. Either they ship games that recommend a 780 and get flamed for being "lazy", or they create games that can run on a 9800 GT and receive hate for not pushing the limits of the master race machines. I thought one of the advantages of choosing the PC platform was the graphical flexibility of games?

This precisely. I'm slowly realizing that a lot of so-called PC gamers are bigger crybabies than the console kids we normally make fun of. At least console kids kind of accept their mediocrity, put the disc in and they're relatively happy. Ignorance is bliss.

PC gamers on the other hand: Whining if game isn't $5-$10 on a Steam sale, whining the game takes up too much space and the download is too big, whining that system requirements are too high and its "unoptimized", whining that the sys requirements are too low or don't really push their GPU 100% and therefore its a "shit console port", whining Steam/Origin/etc are the doom merchants of tyrannical DRM schemes when in reality its the publishers driving and supporting it (publishers are free to put their AAA's on GOG and elsewhere any time, but they won't), the list goes on.....

Granted there are a lot of people in the middle that are just quietly happy with most titles they buy, but some of the fringe elements do get a little trying, especially on a forum like [H] where games capable of bringing hardware to its knees used to be honored and cherished.
 
Would have liked more game play but it does look good.
 
This precisely. I'm slowly realizing that a lot of so-called PC gamers are bigger crybabies than the console kids we normally make fun of. At least console kids kind of accept their mediocrity, put the disc in and they're relatively happy. Ignorance is bliss.

PC gamers on the other hand: Whining if game isn't $5-$10 on a Steam sale, whining the game takes up too much space and the download is too big, whining that system requirements are too high and its "unoptimized", whining that the sys requirements are too low or don't really push their GPU 100% and therefore its a "shit console port", whining Steam/Origin/etc are the doom merchants of tyrannical DRM schemes when in reality its the publishers driving and supporting it (publishers are free to put their AAA's on GOG and elsewhere any time, but they won't), the list goes on.....

Granted there are a lot of people in the middle that are just quietly happy with most titles they buy, but some of the fringe elements do get a little trying, especially on a forum like [H] where games capable of bringing hardware to its knees used to be honored and cherished.

+1000!!!!!!
 
I had read somewhere that V was going to have Mantle support. Have not seen anything from AMD about it though. I'm still hopeful though
 
Don't know what some of you guys are complaining about with the price. It was available for preorder for $45 all last weekend from Greenmangaming
 

Is it your first day here? Welcome to the Internet.

Instead of grossly generalizing crowds, can't you plainly see that any person that has an access to the Internet can type whatever he / she feels like? The great anonymity of this medium almost compels us to whine, hate, vent and cuss.

One, two, or even three, ten or a hundred jerks do not encompass the entire 'PC master race'.

On another note, here's my whine: stop delaying the game already, Rockstar!!
 
At least console kids kind of accept their mediocrity, put the disc in and they're relatively happy.

...snip...

whining the game takes up too much space and the download is too big

So on one hand you have a group that can buy a game, it has a disc, they put the disc in and they play. The other group you have can't buy a disc, and even when they do buy discs, they have to download most of the game, due to whatever last minute updates,changes, 0-day patches, often a few hours to half the day to get ready to play.

Yeah I totally see that as unnecessary whining.
 
Back
Top