Lets Frybench!

2:40 on Server 2012 virtual guest, running on Vsphere 5.5 (24 virtual cpu's, 30gb ram)

Host is an HP Proliant DL360 G6, with dual x5650's and 72gb 1333mhz ram
 
5960x @ 4.3ghz 1:56s
fry_zps95d59780.png
 
is there any reason why you have in your signature 4.4GHz 24/7 and than you post a 4.3GHz benchmark ? :D

Yes the heat is too much even though its stable everything over 1.3v, heat skyrockets on air cooler so i keep it at 1.26v and 4.3ghz if i move to water i can probably do 4.5 1.37v.
 
it's strange, your 990X is fast like my 5930K.
mine does the test in 3 minutes and 6 seconds. :confused:

frybench its extremely sensitive to RAM timings and latency.. that can be the explanation.. even with lower bandwidth his RAM have better responsiveness.. also the CR its at 1T which certainly as found by Primetime it make a good difference in the total time about 20Secs just by that little difference..
 
frybench its extremely sensitive to RAM timings and latency.. that can be the explanation.. even with lower bandwidth his RAM have better responsiveness.. also the CR its at 1T which certainly as found by Primetime it make a good difference in the total time about 20Secs just by that little difference..

I have tried 15-16-16-35-1T and I saved 7 seconds, 2 minutes and 59 seconds.
IMHO that result is photoshopped :D
 
Its a valid result if you compare it with others xeon X56X0 those are all kinda similar arround 3m 12s at similar speeds.
 
this is my result. I lowered the RAM frequency from 3000MHz to 2666MHz and I reduced the timings by a lot.
this is my daily OC so nothing exceptional. I don't like the one time results, I like the daily one and this is mine.

fryrender.PNG
 
Just got my x5650 in the mail and took it for a spin. Forgot to actually save the stock bench but it was just a hair faster than my OC'd 920. Still tweaking things but even at the same clocks it's cooler and scaling nicely.

920_frybenches_zps8742e2d7.jpg


x5650_frybenches_zpsf1b7ed6b.jpg
 
I may have hit the silicon lottery with my 5960x, stable at 4.5ghz @ 1.25v. bench stable at 4.6 @ 1.3v

5960x @ 4.5, i benched it at 4.6 and got the exact same time. wtf?

DCV5TT.jpg
 
Is FryBench limited to 32 cores? Doesn't seem to take full advantage of my 48 core Opteron setup (i don't see any more than 67% cpu utilization)

At any rate here are the results for my Quad Opteron setup with the ES chips set to 2.1 GHz (i only just got this machine put back together so am not running at the full 3.0 GHz yet).

4 x Opteron 61xx ES @ 2.1 GHz, SuperMicro quad opteron motherboard, 32 GB running at DDR 1333. Time 2:27

frybenchat21_zpse8e24f70.png


i'll try to rerun at 3.0 GHz when i get things finalized... anyone have any idea on how to get this benchmark to run with the full 48 cores?
 
Last edited:
Is FryBench limited to 32 cores? Doesn't seem to take full advantage of my 48 core Opteron setup (i don't see any more than 67% cpu utilization)

At any rate here are the results for my Quad Opteron setup with the ES chips set to 2.1 GHz (i only just got this machine put back together so am not running at the full 3.0 GHz yet).

4 x Opteron 61xx ES @ 2.1 GHz, SuperMicro quad opteron motherboard, 32 GB running at DDR 1333. Time 2:27

frybenchat21_zpse8e24f70.png


i'll try to rerun at 3.0 GHz when i get things finalized... anyone have any idea on how to get this benchmark to run with the full 48 cores?

I know that is out of topic but can you tell me what is the software you run on your quad opty?
 
i don't run anything special or out of the ordinary... aside from Microsoft Dev Studio... its my home PC... admittedly a bit overkill but i liked how my 12 core dual Opteron 8439SE system ran so much that i went a bit overboard when building my next PC (which hopefully will last me for at least 3 years). i will be using it to experiment with writing software to take advantage of lots of cores. Hope that helps and hopefully someone can tell me how to get Frybench running properly on my system.
 
i don't run anything special or out of the ordinary... aside from Microsoft Dev Studio... its my home PC... admittedly a bit overkill but i liked how my 12 core dual Opteron 8439SE system ran so much that i went a bit overboard when building my next PC (which hopefully will last me for at least 3 years). i will be using it to experiment with writing software to take advantage of lots of cores. Hope that helps and hopefully someone can tell me how to get Frybench running properly on my system.

what is the CPU load when you run the bench?
why don't you post the same screenshot while the bench is in exectution to see how threads works?
 
i'll do that while it is running later on today. CPU load does not get over 67%. i'll see if i get give it a 3 GHz run as well.

what is the CPU load when you run the bench?
why don't you post the same screenshot while the bench is in exectution to see how threads works?
 
New i7 5920k @ 4.3ghz. Currently running triple channel 2400 DDR4, one stick out of my kit was bad. Pic was taken after test finished (of course), so CPU speeds throttled.

2:57. Hopefully that will improve once the ram is running quad channel..

282i6g7.jpg
 
Not pushing the chip hard as it's at 1.27-1.28v and ram is like 1466Mhz..

time was 3:37

ce545754-98a3-4fa4-a4bc-289583ea54c7.jpg~original
 
Last edited:
4_5ghz.gif




^ come on man gotta admit Yoloswag man haha
 
Last edited:
frymark.png


dual X5675 stock on a supermicro X8DT3 (they were turbo'd to 3333Mhz during the bench)
 
4790k @ 4.7ghz 2400mhz Cas10 ram with stuff running in background and RDP (i'm at work so i had to connect home)

JcQrHuC.jpg
 
frymark.png


dual X5675 stock on a supermicro X8DT3 (they were turbo'd to 3333Mhz during the bench)

very nice!!! Do you game on this setup or is it just other stuff? If i hacksaw the motherboard can it fit in a mid tower...j/k...but i am curious of the power draw
 
various stuff, setup hyper-v vm's before moving over to hypervisors, and also game on it, have a GTX970

very happy with it, and the video card was by far the most expensive part! :D
 
various stuff, setup hyper-v vm's before moving over to hypervisors, and also game on it, have a GTX970

very happy with it, and the video card was by far the most expensive part! :D

nice...you have as much or more cpu power than haswell E's lol....nice setup.....any pic's? Since you not overclocked im guessing the power draw is acceptable if not a bit on the high side even if supermicro is not known for being dependable....hope yours holds out as long as needed
 
I'll get some pictures of it... how is supermicro not reliable?? we have tons of supermicro stuff in service without issues
 
i agree. i've run my 48 core SuperMicro Opteron setup through close to 1000 iterations of IntelBurn test... 700w at the wall during these, and stressing the cpu's to max heat. i would call at least my SuperMicro setup reliable.

I'll get some pictures of it... how is supermicro not reliable?? we have tons of supermicro stuff in service without issues
 
I'll get some pictures of it... how is supermicro not reliable?? we have tons of supermicro stuff in service without issues

guess i was just getting bad info from new egg reviews......what kind of case is required for that board? full towers aren't quite my thing so i wonder if it would fit into anything smaller...would not have to be as small a mid but would be nice.....throw some pics up
asap;)

interestingly enough yours is faster than mine by about one min exactly.....if you ran the app from an ssd i wonder if it would speed it up a little

Capture_zps1fc533a2.png
[/URL][/IMG]
 
Last edited:
finally got the chance (remembered?) and ran my quad opteron setup a bit faster... this time 2.8 GHz...

2:04

frybench%20at%202.8_zps6ymtsc4z.png


It still only utilizes 32 of the 48 cores when running.

i'll try 3 GHz when i get some heat sinks put on the VRMs....
 
Last edited:
Weird, when I run frybench, only 1/2 of my threads are being utilized on my Dual Xeon setup :-(
 
Back
Top