Any 4k Monitors with 120hz or higher and 30"?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 201992
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 201992

Guest
I cannot play multiplayer with anything less than 100fps or I know I am not performing as well as I could. I'm interested in a 4k monitor albeit I don't want to spend more than 2k on one unless it is something top of the line and will last at least 5 years.

Obviously, I don't want to stick with TN panels but I don't want the increased input delay that plagues non-TN screens. Of course I could always just game on this BenQ but I would rather game on something much prettier with better color representation and not face increased delay when I'm competing against others in the 110ms-200ms reaction times. I would consider a 24" 120hz+ TN 4K display but I'm interested in making the switch to something nicer.

I've had an IPS 30" from LG back in 2009 and it really wasn't that much nicer than a properly calibrated TN panel. Sadly my old Macbook Pro has one of the nicest screens I've ever used and other manufacturers are lagging behind.

30"+, OLED, 1-2ms delay Black to black, 150hz, 4K-8K resolution... :eek: I would drop a few grand for something that beautiful.
 
Even if such a monitor existed, the tech to support 120Hz at 4K is not here yet. Video cards will need DP 1.3.
 
If you care about competitive gaming, then imho for now you should wait out 4K. Untill not supported so far by any gpu or monitor DP 1.3, 60hz@UHD is max, current gpu-s, while some very expensive SLI/CF top gpu combinations can push out 100fps@UHD, that's max frame rate, while minimum fps for SLI setups can drop way lower.
 
Unfortunately what they say is true, there isnt a connection that has the bandwidth, HDMI 2.0 is 4K 60Hz.
Someone "may" bring out a display that uses 2x HDMI 2.0 cables for 120Hz and split the screen down the middle to use in 2 screen surround mode.
But you will need an AMD card to use it, NVidia dont support 2 screen surround yet.
 
Connection is one thing - where do you get gpus to reach 120 fps at 4K is other question :)
 
Michaelius said:
Connection is one thing - where do you get gpus to reach 120 fps at 4K is other question :)
Click to expand...
Not even in the near future ... do some simple math and you will notice that not even the generation AFTER the next generation of GPUs will be powerfull enough to run new games @ 120 FPS on mediocore settings.

What i try to say : You can run BF3 @ 4K , no problem. But when BF5 comes out in two years the GPU generation will be at the level @ BF3 when it came out.

BF3 @ 2011 @ GTX 580 = 60 FPS
BF4 @ 2013 @ 780 = 60 FPS
BF5 @ 2016 @ GTX Titan Black Extendet 24GB edition = 59,75 FPS

On FullHD, not 4K , and still with only 60 instead of 120 FPS :D
 
4k not enouigh, I wait for 5040x2160 (21:9) at 144hz FreeSync on a 60"+, with a curved OLED as panel. That's my dream monitor. :eek:
 
There's like only one native 120hz 2560x1440 resolution (which has been around for awhile) monitor, let alone 4k at 3840x2160. Think there's only two 3840x2160 that even do native 60hz.
 
Imho they will release 8K Monitors which could be called "Full HD of the newtime" and 4K = HD ready compared to our actual standarts.
 
The Dark Session said:
Imho they will release 8K Monitors which could be called "Full HD of the newtime" and 4K = HD ready compared to our actual standarts.
Click to expand...

A 100" 10'080x4320 240hz FreeSync OLED curved monitor will be the last monitor we will ever need. :D
 
No. Make it 8K per eye lightweight glasses with 3d with no lag wireless interface. And even then you can upgrade it to direct image input via implants with limits on resolution and refresh and other things only by capability of user's brain :)
 
Church said:
No. Make it 8K per eye lightweight glasses with 3d with no lag wireless interface. And even then you can upgrade it to direct image input via implants with limits on resolution and refresh and other things only by capability of user's brain :)
Click to expand...

Well, that's the next step beyond monitors, I was still talking about the last tier WITHIN the monitors ecosystem. :D
 
Why not a IPS 0.00001MS 244.000Hz UltraquadpremiumreadyfullHD 13333333333333333337:1 (contrast) with 90" 40:9 (aspect ratio) 6D extremetothemaxprogaming monitor.

Can be run with a Voodo 3 @ 6000 FPS. And costs only 20 bucks with shipping from amazon.
 
The Dark Session said:
Why not a IPS 0.00001MS 244.000Hz UltraquadpremiumreadyfullHD 13333333333333333337:1 (contrast) with 90" 40:9 (aspect ratio) 6D extremetothemaxprogaming monitor.

Can be run with a Voodo 3 @ 6000 FPS. And costs only 20 bucks with shipping from amazon.
Click to expand...

Because that's impossible.
What we've written above is something that's possible right now, only fairly expensive to do. ;)
 
lol this thread seems like an entire troll thread.

You want a 30 inch 4k 120hz refresh rate monitor? lol.

We are just NOW getting a mainstream 120hz 1440p 27" monitor (yes i know it could be done before with overclocking and custom panels but that's not mainstream).

4k + 120hz is literally 6-10 years off in my opinion. HDMI 2.0 hasn't even fully rolled out yet, and that's only up to 60hz.
 
I feel confident some day the GPUs will catch up to run the 4K but we are talking years here. In the meantime gamers will have to run no less than dual sli/cf.If that is too rich for your wallet than simply dont buy 4k until you know there is adequate gpu cards to do it.
 
Troll thread created by someone who does not know how to use Google. Close.
 
The 39 or 50 inch seiki is a good compromize.

It is a S-MVA panel (not a shitty TN).

It can only do 3840x2160 @ 30Hz but that is fine for desktop work/video.

It will do 120Hz @ 1920x1080p (1 frame of input lag) which makes it great for almost all games. That 9ms from one frame of input lag is just slightly too much for one FPS (quakelive) for me but fine on all others. For quakelive I drop it to 1280x720@240Hz. It drops half the frames (still only 120Hz output on the display) but it cuts the input lag in half down to ~4.5ms.
 
How far out is the display technology that would enable something at 4k res, 120hz with very low input lag? HDMI 3.0? Display port 2.1?
 
That's only connection - we still need better scallers because so far every 4k display has bigger input lag.

Will be interesting how that g-sync 4k acer works.
 
There are some new 120/144hz ASUS/BenQ monitors that do 2560x1440 now. 4k sometime soon?;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top