Poll: Do You Still Use A Desktop PC?

No desktop needed here. Laptops and netbooks are completely good enough. My laptop has a docking station so there's a monitor and other junk plugged in. It doesn't really move around much because I use my netbook from the living room where its more comfy to sit on the couch under a blanket slurping up hot choco to read stuff and play games.
 
I do not have much use for tablets... maybe when they have capability of Wacom tablet at low price point...

The Samsung Note devices have Wacom digitizers that Samsung calls s-pen technology for some reason. Asus is launching the VivoTab Note 8, a Windows 8.1 Bay Trail 1280x800 8" tablet with a Wacom digitizer in the next 60 days starting at $300. If the device is as decent as the other 8" Windows 8 tablets out there and the Wacom digitizer performs as expected, Asus will sell a lot of these things. I definitely getting one.
 
i'm still gaming... so i'll always be using a desktop

price/performance for a desktop will always be better than a laptop
 
I actually have two tablets now, a cheap one permanently mounted to the A-pillar as a carputer, and a iPad I use when on the crapper, in bed, or when on the go.

But until they make tablets with 10TB of fast local storage that's powerful enough to truly multitask and run premiere and the latest and greatest games at ultra-high resolution and what not without costing an arm and a leg, then, yeah... I don't see the need for miniaturization at home.

I see the future involving one powerful desktop, and then lightweight simple devices elsewhere in the home.
 
Someone should setup a computer hidden in best buy hooked up via hdmi to tv and make it appear as a new console and let the people try out some of the latest games on the pc with it. Have your mouse keyboard, and of course game pads they can use. I bet it would blow peoples minds that don't have a clue how much better a pc is at games over some silly console.
 
Someone should setup a computer hidden in best buy hooked up via hdmi to tv and make it appear as a new console and let the people try out some of the latest games on the pc with it. Have your mouse keyboard, and of course game pads they can use. I bet it would blow peoples minds that don't have a clue how much better a pc is at games over some silly console.

Then you hit all the issues. People didn't like the idea of all digital game consoles because they couldn't buy used games or rent games, something you can't do for the pc. So there goes that. You can't take pc games to a friends house.

PC gaming is more of a single person or multiplayer online experience, console gaming has that and adds in local multiplayer on the same screen.

It is also still easier to game from the couch with a console than it is a pc.

I use both, but consoles make it much easier. I find gaming easier on the console, but better looking on the pc. but I don't play games because of how they look. And for some console games I find them to appear just fine. There are only a few games that I have HAD to get on the pc over the console. but then again I am the type of person that can watch a DVD movie and consider it watchable and not sit and bitch and moan the entire time about how horrible it looks. And for a few years found upscaled DVDs to 1080 to be acceptable as a gap between going from DVD to Blu-ray till the price came down.
 
Don't know what rock you live under bud but I have wireless laptop keyboard, mouse, pads connected to my tv so blows that easier to game with console out the door. And you say you can't take your computer to play games over to another persons house ???? WTF you talking about haha Oh and there is another option too called 2x layer BLUE RAYS and image files. Heck I can grab my collection of games, apps, you name it and go anywhere with literally thousands and thousands of games, apps etc.
 
Wife and I are PC gamers, so definately use desktops. Overall, have 2 desktops and 2 laptops in our household. Also own a tablet though and a smartphone. I think desktop will still have a place in the electronics/computing market for quite sometime.
 
It is also still easier to game from the couch with a console than it is a pc.
I always hear console apologists say this, and they can't explain why. Why is a gaming laptop hooked up with an HDMI cable to your HDTV somehow more difficult to power on than a console hooked up with the same cable? If its because of peripherals, there have always been a multitude of peripherals available for the PC. Heck, you can use a wii or xbox controller just fine, although most people choose not to since accuracy tends to suffer. I stick with an Anywhere MX, but they also have air-mice/air-remotes, trackballs, touchpads, etc.
 
Although I didn't see any poll on the cnet site, I'm shocked if the number was ONLY 83%.
 
Although I didn't see any poll on the cnet site, I'm shocked if the number was ONLY 83%.

Just took the poll and the number is now at 87%, which seems more than reasonable, it's very likely that there are people that use PCs daily that don't even realize that they are. Interesting that the image of the PC in the title section of the OP article is that of a Sony. Something that I'm sure the author thought was a clever double entendre.
 
Just took the poll and the number is now at 87%, which seems more than reasonable, it's very likely that there are people that use PCs daily that don't even realize that they are. Interesting that the image of the PC in the title section of the OP article is that of a Sony. Something that I'm sure the author thought was a clever double entendre.

The image title was 'Say goodbye to Sony personal computers. (Credit: Sony)' so I guess it was article related.
 
Desktops are not going any where any time soon, nothing else is as robust. Laptops are fine expecialy if your a traveling insurance salesman, I use mine to do medical charts on the go or do sales presentations at out of office locations but nothing beats my desktop array. I can not imagine [H]ard folding on my tablet farm. Now I wonder if I can use my FreeTrack on my Droid? The only thing that could take place of my desktop as my main PC is wearable computers that give me full immersion into the VR Realm.
 
Two desktops mostly (gaming PC and a workstation), a Chromebook occasionally (sofa browsing/holiday use) and a Nexus 4 (day to day updates on the go).

It's Windows Laptop use that's nearly gone for me.
 
Just a desktop and laptop household here. However, I am using my desktop less and less as it's mainly for gaming. I just don't game as often as I would like.
 
I don't see the desktop fading at all anytime soon. Maybe they need to change these types of poles and consider the type of user as well, instead of asking the same age-old question,,lol
I can see a lot less desktops being used by users that just surf the web, email, social sites, etc. That makes sense with the tech available today. Recently it was shown that around 80% of Facebook users are connecting with mobile devices, that alone says something.
But, if you do anymore than that, such as gaming, video editing, etc. your going to be on a desktop.
Personally, everyone in my household uses a desktop system. I'll use my ultrabook once and a while if I want to surf the web a little while watching TV.
Just the fact of the capabilities and versatility of a desktop system alone, is enough to say they will be around for a long long time.
 
I always hear console apologists say this, and they can't explain why. Why is a gaming laptop hooked up with an HDMI cable to your HDTV somehow more difficult to power on than a console hooked up with the same cable? If its because of peripherals, there have always been a multitude of peripherals available for the PC. Heck, you can use a wii or xbox controller just fine, although most people choose not to since accuracy tends to suffer. I stick with an Anywhere MX, but they also have air-mice/air-remotes, trackballs, touchpads, etc.

I can offer up reasons.

Taking your example there. Doubt you would leave your laptop connected at all times otherwise that kind of makes for a waste of a laptop. So every time that you would want to play a game you would have to go connect the laptop. That takes some time, not much, but that still takes more time and effort than a device always connected. Lets assume that you have a computer that is connected to the TV at all times just like a game console.

I want to turn on said device. For my Xbox one I walk into the room, and just say Xbox on. and it turns everything on for me. For the 360 or Wii you press a button on their controller. Assuming the PS3 and 4 can be turned on from the controller also. For the computer you have to walk over to it and press the power button.

The console takes less time to get into the system. in my case, which can be different for all of course, I have a password set on my computer to prevent just having an admin account on a computer sitting there open with no protection. So I have to log in the computer.

Once I am in the system I only need my controller for the console, that is it. For my pc I have to grab a controller (if I will be using one for the game), a wireless keyboard, a wireless mouse and a tv tray to use them on (which is hard to get as good of a position on as a desktop gives). I then have to use the keyboard and mouse to get everything setup and going and then can switch over to the controller if I want / need to for a game. For the console I just use the one device to get into a game, two if I use kinnect to launch the game but then i'm just using my voice.

And that is just looking at it from once you have the game. Which you then have to worry about if your computer can support a game. If somebody goes buys a $500-$600 computer today, will that let them play the latest and greatest 7 years from now? They will always have to look at specs to make sure they can play games. Not really a requirement on a console other than maybe a single attachment that might be needed. Which it is easier to know if you have a kinnect or an eyetoy or a wii board that it is to know if you have at least a core i5 or equivalent, Geforce 200 or equivalent. Also easier for others to know what you have. friends or family can know that you have an xbox or playstation, not going to know the specs of your computer. You also have to worry about the OS on the computer. Xbox 360 went on sell Nov 2005 at this time the OS in use was XP, PS 3 went on sell one year later which was till XP. Now both have finally been replaced but will still have games released for them for a little longer. XP it hitting end of support here in a few months, Some games require at least Vista now. So a gaming pc purchased at the same time as the 360 or ps 3 was released without you having upgraded the OS wouldn't be able to play some of the new games being released.

As I said I game on both consoles and pc. My computer is connected to my tv and I game from either from my couch, find it harder to do with a keyboard and mouse so try to play most games if possible with a controller (even FPS games which I suck at already) but still I do play either from my couch. I also personally don't have to worry about requirements as I know what hardware / software I have and upgrade accordingly. But I also know that for the average person (that means not me or you or anyone else on this forum) they are not going to be able to handle pc games on the same scale that they could console gaming. My sister has purchased pc games for her kids that their computers just can't run either due to OS or hardware. She doesn't know what she has. She knows that she which consoles they have and can buy them stuff for that without an issue.

You have to look at it from the standpoint of the average person, not from our perspective. For some people taking a car apart down to every single nut and bolt being removed and putting it all back together is a piece of cake. if I dropped off a box of parts could you personally rebuild a car? Did you buy a house or did you build it all by hand yourself and do all the work yourself? you can get a much better house building it yourself and get exactly what you want with better results. So did you go that route? Some people do. Just because one person or one group of people find something doable or easy, doesn't mean that every person out there will. Now yes my examples here are a little to the extreme, just trying to point out that not everyone is going to find something as simple to do as another.
 
2 desktops, 2 laptops, and a iphone.....

I think it is situation dependent. I would much rather sit at my computer for gaming and doing other work. However, when I am listening to the news on TV, I don't mind using the laptop for bill paying and such.

I know so many who only visit facebrag from their phone or tablet. mainly because they don't spend the time reading everyone else's stuff, or they are doing it while they are bored as a passenger in a car. Certainly I don't see it limited to just those situations. They read two to three post, post their own non-sense, then they are done.

I don't think the desktop is going to go away any time soon.
 
Taking your example there. Doubt you would leave your laptop connected at all times otherwise that kind of makes for a waste of a laptop. So every time that you would want to play a game you would have to go connect the laptop.
I do for the most part, but you can also get one that has a docking station if you are clicking and unclicking often. Laptop was a good form factor for me since it was small and quiet and I have a small screen so I don't have to power on my 60" or projector if I'm just jamming to tunes through my home theater sound system.
I want to turn on said device. For my Xbox one I walk into the room, and just say Xbox on. and it turns everything on for me. For the 360 or Wii you press a button on their controller. Assuming the PS3 and 4 can be turned on from the controller also. For the computer you have to walk over to it and press the power button.
No you don't, you move the mouse or press the power button on the windows remote. And every game is loaded onto the harddrive, you don't have to go to your closet, open up the jewel case for the game you want to play, take out the old one, pop in the new one and wait for it to load. ;) And yeah, reading data off a modern SSD is slightly faster than off a bluray or DVD.
The console takes less time to get into the system. in my case, which can be different for all of course, I have a password set on my computer to prevent just having an admin account on a computer sitting there open with no protection. So I have to log in the computer.
You certainly don't have to have a password set, and waking a computer with a SSD takes a second or two tops.
Once I am in the system I only need my controller for the console, that is it. For my pc I have to grab a controller (if I will be using one for the game), a wireless keyboard, a wireless mouse and a tv tray to use them on (which is hard to get as good of a position on as a desktop gives).
You don't HAVE to do any of those things, but you certainly have the OPTION which is wonderful. You can use voice commands like the Xbox if you want. You can use an onscreen keyboard if you care to, and it certainly won't be any more of a PITA than an onscreen keyboard with a playstation or xbox controller. The plethora of options available makes that nonsense, and its better to have an option than to have none IMO.
And that is just looking at it from once you have the game. Which you then have to worry about if your computer can support a game. If somebody goes buys a $500-$600 computer today, will that let them play the latest and greatest 7 years from now?
This is another one of those completely idiotic comments, sorry. 2014 technology is 2014 technology, whether you put it in a console or a generic PC. Old consoles simply are already configured to play the games with very low settings, recently with the 360 usually a lowly 720p resolution, very limited draw distance, no anti-aliasing, and so forth. On a similar aged PC, you would likewise simply either set the settings yourself to be just as low, or in most games today it analyzes your computer and does it for you, hands free. :D

And in fact you stumbled on one of the stupid things about a console. Your entire game library is now obsolete unless you keep the last generation console around. If I want to but out Sid Meiers Pirates! for shits and giggles, I just launch it on my new computer. And did I mention that its been heavily modded by the community? That's another thing that can give older games (or even current ones) a lot more enjoyability, that simply isn't an option on consoles... at least not without paying $5 a pop for microtransaction little mods.

With regard to the argument that some people are too stupid to use a computer simply because it has so many more functions it could confuse them, fine, I can certainly see there is a segment of the population that lacks the education and general IQ to handle more than a Xbox One. But for someone on this forum to use that argument? That's what gets me.
 
I do for the most part, but you can also get one that has a docking station if you are clicking and unclicking often. Laptop was a good form factor for me since it was small and quiet and I have a small screen so I don't have to power on my 60" or projector if I'm just jamming to tunes through my home theater sound system.

No you don't, you move the mouse or press the power button on the windows remote. And every game is loaded onto the harddrive, you don't have to go to your closet, open up the jewel case for the game you want to play, take out the old one, pop in the new one and wait for it to load. ;) And yeah, reading data off a modern SSD is slightly faster than off a bluray or DVD.

You certainly don't have to have a password set, and waking a computer with a SSD takes a second or two tops.

You don't HAVE to do any of those things, but you certainly have the OPTION which is wonderful. You can use voice commands like the Xbox if you want. You can use an onscreen keyboard if you care to, and it certainly won't be any more of a PITA than an onscreen keyboard with a playstation or xbox controller. The plethora of options available makes that nonsense, and its better to have an option than to have none IMO.

This is another one of those completely idiotic comments, sorry. 2014 technology is 2014 technology, whether you put it in a console or a generic PC. Old consoles simply are already configured to play the games with very low settings, recently with the 360 usually a lowly 720p resolution, very limited draw distance, no anti-aliasing, and so forth. On a similar aged PC, you would likewise simply either set the settings yourself to be just as low, or in most games today it analyzes your computer and does it for you, hands free. :D

And in fact you stumbled on one of the stupid things about a console. Your entire game library is now obsolete unless you keep the last generation console around. If I want to but out Sid Meiers Pirates! for shits and giggles, I just launch it on my new computer. And did I mention that its been heavily modded by the community? That's another thing that can give older games (or even current ones) a lot more enjoyability, that simply isn't an option on consoles... at least not without paying $5 a pop for microtransaction little mods.

With regard to the argument that some people are too stupid to use a computer simply because it has so many more functions it could confuse them, fine, I can certainly see there is a segment of the population that lacks the education and general IQ to handle more than a Xbox One. But for someone on this forum to use that argument? That's what gets me.

You are not looking at any of that from the same standpoint that I was talking about. I don't care what me or you could do. The original post I replied to was talking about the average person. My comment was based on the average person. Not me or you. I spend a few hundred every few years upgrading parts of my desktop. I don't expect the average person to do that. The average person out there getting a game system for their 4 year old isn't going to want to spend the $3k over the past 10 years like I have on parts, and I know that at only $3K I am probably on the cheaper end that most of the rest of you guys. They also aren't going to want to build their own computer so they would be looking at prebuild computers which for tons of special features are going to really cost them.

From the view of the average person, buying a system for their kids, consoles are easier. For us that can customize to get exactly what we want, sure we can make them closer to the same experience. You are looking at it from the standpoint of we can spend thousands buying the top of the line everything, I was commenting based on the average person on the street that thinks that the black Friday computer is over priced, that laptops shouldn't cost more than $200 and what they would have to go through.

As I stated I game on both. My keyboard and mouse sit right next to the controllers on the coffee table. my desktop is connected to my tv and gets used for gaming as much as the console. I personally don't care which I am on, but I am not the average person on the street.
 
I don't believe the average young person today, at least in good society, is as incompetent as you think as they have grown up with computers. I also don't understand your economics argument... it. makes. no. sense.

If you can tolerate the performance of a 10 year old console, then you can tolerate the exact same performance of a 10 year old PC. The 10 year old console didn't magically update its hardware for free via a cloud download, and the fact that you CAN update a PC doesn't mean that you HAVE to. This is something that seems to confuse console apologists.

And since when does it cost thousands of dollars to match the performance of a simple cheapo console box? Especially when you consider that if you need a computer anyway, that the only price difference is getting a good graphics card (which has other uses anyway). Besides, the business model of consoles is generally to rape you on game costs instead, so a big library can really cost you big and its the total spent that matters.

In any case, back on topic of why I think a single powerful desktop is the solution for every home longterm, is that they can serve so many uses. They can serve as your own fast cloud, backup all your crap, serve everything, monitor and control your security system, cameras, lights, air-conditioner, and other smart devices, play your games, do your work, act as your whole home's TV tuners and TIVO, create content, and so much more. And it can eliminate so much unnecessary redundancy. I already wired my house w/ cat6 in every room along w/ two wireless routers at each opposite corner, but I'd like to see a good product to produce lag free multi-room HTPC functionality. Yeah, I've heard of the media center extenders, but that's not truly the real deal, and I wonder if video over ethernet has too much latency or what the hold up is on that.
 
2 i7 Based gaming rigs.GTX 780Ti, GTX 680 (me+gf) each on 46" TV
1 C2Q Based gaming rig. GTX 670 (daughter) on 42" TV
My Steam account is pushing 400 titles, not including my gf's and daughter's accounts.
1 C2D Based Headless Storage desktop with 9.5TB space on RDP
1 i5 laptop setup as an HTPC on 32" TV and wireless kb/trackpad
1 Dual Quad Xeon Mac Pro desktop running Mt Lion and Win7 Bootcamp.
1 46" TV for dropin buddies and my bro when he can stop by with his rig.
1 47" TV for dropin buddies with a rig and for my newer consoles. Wii, PS3, 360
1 32" Widescreen DVI + analog CRT for old consoles. NES, Genesis, Saturn, N64, Gamecube with GB player, PS2, Xbox orig. SNES, Dreamcast
1 Data Projector displaying at 132" for old consoles, TV and movies.

1 HTC One on KitKat. Fantastic phone, but I'd rather browse, type and game on a desktop any day. Use it for BBM, texting, emergency service calls, and looking stuff up at work in a pinch. I sooner RDP to my work desktop than use my phone if I can. I hate gaming on it.

1 Acer A200 Teg2 Tablet. It collects dust. I hate browsing on it and using a piece of glass to play games. Seemed great in theory, but I realized I just prefer keyboards and using Windows based browsers. I also prefer desktop based websites to mobile sites, even for facebook.

This isn't a post to brag. I am very fortunate I can do what I love, but I'm sure lots of you have way cooler stuff than me and I think that is awesome. Just sharing my love for desktops and gaming in general. I always try to get others on the bandwagon by building up desktops and gaming rigs with my old parts and give them away. I have given away dozens of old desktops to those less fortunate in just the last few years alone.

If smartphones and tablets disappeared tomorrow, I wouldn't shed a single tear. In fact I'd be glad. IMO they have nothing to improve over desktops and are ruining the gaming industry. No offense to anyone, just my opinion.

I'd love to hear more about everyone's desktops and how you all help keep the desktop platform alive :)
 
Proud desktop owner. I like my laptops, and even bought a tablet for the wife. But to get serious work and gaming done, nothing can replace my desktop
 
The poll now has desktops at 87%...

We live in a time where DINOSAURS STILL RULE THE EARTH!
 
You too?! Glad to see I'm not the only dino around here. I don't even own a smart phone. Why bother when I'm in front of a 27" monitor most of the time? It's just too hard to go small after staring at that thing. I'm home most of the time, so not real need for a smartphone.
I did get a smartphone about 2.5 years ago. That is something I use a lot, esp. when I'm not home. It helps that I still have the unlimited data plan. :)

But I don't plan on getting a tablet for myself anytime soon. I bought a Surface tablet for my parents' for X-mas a couple months ago. But for them (they also have smartphones), they need the bigger screen, whereas I can see just fine on my 5" phone for basic e-mailing and surfing.
 
My smartphone is a glorified mp3 player/Pandora streaming device for work. Five desktops at home, no laptops, no tablets. My wife's smartphone doesn't even have a data plan since TMo gives you 500MB free and she hasn't gone over 200MB in a month. Her PC OTOH is good for at least 30-40GB a month.

For my house, the desktop is not going to die any time soon. Too many things that a tablet cannot do that is still part of our regular daily routine.
 
i was surprised by the 83%. i would have guessed it would be lower.

new poll: Excluding work, do you use a desktop?

A lot of the reason for that is probably because it includes work computers. Tons of people now only have laptops for their home PCs, but most office environments still use desktops. The results may also be skewed by the type of people who read CNET, since it's a technology focused website.

HardOCP is going to have very skewed opinions on that matter too. People on this site like fast PCs, customizing their PCs, and good bang-for-you-buck performance. Laptops don't have any of those qualities.
 
I moved from a Mac Pro to a Dell Precision Mobile Workstation which basically is permanently hooked up to its dock. I had planned to become more mobile because of a new job but that didn't pan out. I think I'll probably move to an HP Z workstation. I'd love to experience the thrill of building my own PC but I need the peace of mind of a pro warranty.
 
i was surprised by the 83%. i would have guessed it would be lower.

new poll: Excluding work, do you use a desktop?

Yes. I have a tablet that I rarely use. I've never owned a laptop and hate when I have to use one. Give me a full keyboard, mouse and a large monitor.
 
There are 5 desktops in my house.
A surface pro 2.
2 win laptops.
An iPad.
2 iPhones and one windows phone.
 
88% now.

Desktops are going to be here for a long, long time. Tablets are just for convenience when no real need for productivity exists. Tablet laptop hybrids are good only for low intensity computing where portability is a requirement.
 
88% now.

Desktops are going to be here for a long, long time. Tablets are just for convenience when no real need for productivity exists. Tablet laptop hybrids are good only for low intensity computing where portability is a requirement.

Amazing how this incorrect information is propagated constantly. :rolleyes: I use a desktop at work for specific tasks but, there is no way I am taking my desktop onsite to do work. Laptops are also overkill for most onsite tasks and is much heavier than a tablet. (I am referring to Windows based tablets that can actually get work done.)
 
7 currently used desktops (mostly SFF) and one laptop in a 3 room apt. I hate typing on a laptop keyboard, so I have several NOS IBM M keyboards put away should the two I'm using ever break. So far, both have outlasted all the computers. Damn, they're hard to kill.
 
Back
Top