GTX 680 specs leaked

  • Thread starter Deleted member 82943
  • Start date
WTF is TXAA? Is it a revision of FXAA? Or did some clown mistype?

TXAA = enhanced MSAA version so far only available for GTX 680

Practical function open: new antialiasing technology TXAA

In addition to the graphics performance, NVIDIA also for the needs of gamers, add a number of new and useful features for a new generation of the GeForce GTX 680, released a new anti-aliasing technology TXAA, a new generation of hardware rendering anti-aliasing technology, actually belongs to the old MSAA's enhanced version provides better anti-aliasing I can reduce the open antialiasing fluency decline, for the time being belonging to the GeForce GTX 680 unique anti-aliasing, but NVIDIA said that the above will be open at a later time to the GeForce GTX 500 or Model.

TXAA temporarily can be divided into two levels: TXAA 1 and TXAA, the former costs only 2x the MSAA similar, but the MSAA is better than the 8x anti-aliasing; As for TXAA 2 effect is more outstanding, but the cost only similar with 4x MSAA. TXAA game itself support to be open to use, support TXAA variety of games will be held during the year stage, although present, failed to test its real performance, but based on the NVIDIA official photos can be seen, antialiasing does, it is worth looking forward to.

In addition to the new TXAA Antialiasing, NVIDIA is also an existing graphics card users to bring good news, the introduction of the original few games before the corresponding FXAA to the NVIDIA Control Panel, users can easily turn the feature on. lead to better anti-aliasing for different games, and enhance the quality of the game screen.
 
From Beyond3d.

GTX 680: 72.2 FPS
HD 7970: 70.5 FPS

bf3zc.png
 
From Beyond3d.

GTX 680: 72.2 FPS
HD 7970: 70.5 FPS

bf3zc.png

Yeah, I knew there was something weird about that pic.

Something seems off, though, as we've heard in BF3 it should be more like 40% faster. This is like... 2%. :confused:
 
Is it fair to show benchmarks with the 680 running at "boost clocks" 706 base-1006 boost?
I like the concept, 300mhz on its own has caught my interest.
 
Is it fair to show benchmarks with the 680 running at "boost clocks" 706 base-1006 boost?
I like the concept, 300mhz on its own has caught my interest.

If that was the card does out of the box, than sure. No different than comparing a 2500K at its 3.7 turbo speed.
 
Seems like the 680 is outperforming the 7970, but do you think this will be the same on 2560x1600+? Maybe on higher resolutions the 3GB VRAM will help the 7970 to perform better then the gtx.
 
Seems like the 680 is outperforming the 7970, but do you think this will be the same on 2560x1600+? Maybe on higher resolutions the 3GB VRAM will help the 7970 to perform better then the gtx.

2GB (if true) shouldn't have any problems at such a low resolution.
 
Yeah, I knew there was something weird about that pic.

Something seems off, though, as we've heard in BF3 it should be more like 40% faster. This is like... 2%. :confused:

I've seen a post from a reviewer that the review may be using outdated drivers, which might explain the poor BF3 performance.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top