Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Comparing FO3 to SOC is like comparing Saving Private Ryan to The Longest Day. They are both great movies but one is way more gritty and intense. while the other is a lot more light hearted though with the same general feel. Not that FO3 feels any thing like SOC.
If you liked FO3, play New Vegas its way better. The only dlc worth getting is old world blues, its kinda got that crazy, funny, sciency feel akin to portal. The other dlc suck
Though I liked FO3,and am in the process of playing New Vegas now,they just don't compare to the STALKER games.As you pointed out,they have a much grittier,serious tone to them,and do a far superior job of creating an immersive world.They are much better graphically as well.I think the Fallout games tried to emulate STALKER,but there are obvious concessions to the limitations of consoles that hurt the atmosphere of the games,the endless subway sequences in Fallout 3 seemed like annoying fillers to me,while the underground X labs and tunnels in SoC were truly creepy. I'll give Fallout big points for not going the tired old linear run 'n gun route,but they could have done better.
I played Clear Sky before SoC because that's the chronological order And boy was it awesome.
The one thing that is pissing me off about FO3 is that it is still buggy... it crashes more than any other game I have played, I have encountered broken quests and disappearing people (I am only at level a level 4 or something, so I haven't played it a lot yet...). After 3 plus years, I would think all that crap would be ironed out! I still like the game though, it isn't a deal breaker. The story line keeps you going.
Sooooo... it's a lot more like unmodded Stalker:ShoC than you thought?