Hi,
I'm a rather old and silent reader but I'm now in need of some help myself for a change.
I have an old computer running an Opteron 185 and an ATi Xpress 200-chipset which is in need of upgrade since I'm running into some hardware limitations such as not being able to address more than ~3,2Gb of memory even in 64-bit mode and it's running quite hot due to non existing Cool 'n Quiet technology.
Right now I have 4 drives attached to the southbridge (SB450) which performs decently but far from great. I also have 4 additional drives connected to a Promise SATA300 TX4 PCI card that really doesn't like RAIDZ at all (getting 20mbyte/s tops) on FreeBSD 9-CURRENT and it's been like that since the early 7.X-days.
Anyhow, I'm looking at an Intel Q57 or possibly Q67 chipset-based solution due to headless remote access (http://www.realvnc.com/products/viewerplus/hardware.html), much better virtualization support than my current hardware and integrated Intel LAN.
Reading up on controllers the general consensus seems to be that Intel's southbridges performs well and LSI SAS2008 series are suitable as additional controller(s) if you want recent hardware and good performance. Reading regarding the older controllers (LSI 1068) it seems to be preferable to have IR-firmware instead of IT although I'm not really sure what the difference is apart from SAS expander supprt(?).
Doing research of what's available where I live (Sweden) I've found two controllers available to a decent (affordable) price but there seems to be some differences even though the cards appears to be very much alike.
http://www.intel.com/products/server/raid-controllers/RS2WC080/RS2WC080-overview.htm
ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/xsd03053usen/XSD03053USEN.PDF
http://www.lsi.com/channel/products/hba/sas_sata_hbas/internal/lsisas92118i/index.html <-- Also available, seems to be a mix between IBM (better) but worse than the Intel card looking at features?
From what I can tell which seems odd is that the IBM card doesn't seem to support JBOD (which is what I want?), direct non cached access and RAID5 (needs additional card/key?) as compared to the Intel card although I might be wrong on this.
Looking at IBM's controller there seems to be no firmware upgrades available while Intel at least seems to offer some firmware upgrades. Both cards appears to be clones of http://www.lsi.com/storage_home/pro...pters/sas_hbas/internal/sas9210-8i/index.html with some minor modifications but LSI doesn't seem to offer firmwares for their model. Should I be concerned regarding lack of IR/IT-firmware and which controller would be more suitable? As a side note I've read that both cards have a webinterface, does this work by itself or is software involved in some way? The LSI 9211-8i card doesn't seem to support webinterface, no RAID5(?) although LSI provides firmware upgrades which I guess is better than the IBM card unless you can crossflash it (or any of the cards mentioned).
Best regards,
Daniel
I'm a rather old and silent reader but I'm now in need of some help myself for a change.
I have an old computer running an Opteron 185 and an ATi Xpress 200-chipset which is in need of upgrade since I'm running into some hardware limitations such as not being able to address more than ~3,2Gb of memory even in 64-bit mode and it's running quite hot due to non existing Cool 'n Quiet technology.
Right now I have 4 drives attached to the southbridge (SB450) which performs decently but far from great. I also have 4 additional drives connected to a Promise SATA300 TX4 PCI card that really doesn't like RAIDZ at all (getting 20mbyte/s tops) on FreeBSD 9-CURRENT and it's been like that since the early 7.X-days.
Anyhow, I'm looking at an Intel Q57 or possibly Q67 chipset-based solution due to headless remote access (http://www.realvnc.com/products/viewerplus/hardware.html), much better virtualization support than my current hardware and integrated Intel LAN.
Reading up on controllers the general consensus seems to be that Intel's southbridges performs well and LSI SAS2008 series are suitable as additional controller(s) if you want recent hardware and good performance. Reading regarding the older controllers (LSI 1068) it seems to be preferable to have IR-firmware instead of IT although I'm not really sure what the difference is apart from SAS expander supprt(?).
Doing research of what's available where I live (Sweden) I've found two controllers available to a decent (affordable) price but there seems to be some differences even though the cards appears to be very much alike.
http://www.intel.com/products/server/raid-controllers/RS2WC080/RS2WC080-overview.htm
ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/xsd03053usen/XSD03053USEN.PDF
http://www.lsi.com/channel/products/hba/sas_sata_hbas/internal/lsisas92118i/index.html <-- Also available, seems to be a mix between IBM (better) but worse than the Intel card looking at features?
From what I can tell which seems odd is that the IBM card doesn't seem to support JBOD (which is what I want?), direct non cached access and RAID5 (needs additional card/key?) as compared to the Intel card although I might be wrong on this.
Looking at IBM's controller there seems to be no firmware upgrades available while Intel at least seems to offer some firmware upgrades. Both cards appears to be clones of http://www.lsi.com/storage_home/pro...pters/sas_hbas/internal/sas9210-8i/index.html with some minor modifications but LSI doesn't seem to offer firmwares for their model. Should I be concerned regarding lack of IR/IT-firmware and which controller would be more suitable? As a side note I've read that both cards have a webinterface, does this work by itself or is software involved in some way? The LSI 9211-8i card doesn't seem to support webinterface, no RAID5(?) although LSI provides firmware upgrades which I guess is better than the IBM card unless you can crossflash it (or any of the cards mentioned).
Best regards,
Daniel
Last edited: