Network pics thread

rotherad said:
Yes, but when I bought the pod GNS3 was a little less stable than it is now and I could never get more than 2 routers to stay stable for longer than like 10mins
Click to expand...
thats why you needed to use dynamips on linux w/ dynagen ;)
 
Hardware Porn!
Humm, some pretty Cisco boxes
999702806_39MqA-L.jpg

What could be in here?
999701770_jwZRS-L-1.jpg

Woo Hoo! My Nexus 5k's came!

Will post data center pictures before/after. Going to a 100% virtual environment.
 
calvinj said:
Pics or ban
Click to expand...

Ha!

I'll get pics, the server hardware is not in yet, and we have to make a final decision on SAN and DR SAN this week. That combined with replacing our firewalls with ASA's and it is the biggest IT budget year I have seen :D

The gist of what we are doing - doing a full server / hardware / network / storage refresh on our datacenter and DR site. Going from 4 full racks into 5 servers. Servers are HP DL380 G7's with dual hex-core x5680 at 3.33GHz w/ 96GB ram running ESXi 4.1. Network will be all 10GbE converged on IP (either iSCSI or NFS) handled by 2 Nexus 5010's.

SAN is TBD, but finalists are Compellent, EMC, NetApp. 30TB primary site, 30TB replication site; primary site configured to handle 13k IOPS.
 
Vito_Corleone said:
Where are the 7K pics?!?
Click to expand...

I really want to get some 7k's to replace our classic 6500, but it looks like we will only be getting a 6500E chassis so we can re-use our existing gig line cards.

The entire data center is going to live on the 5ks and fiber aggregation from the rest of the campus will go through the 6500. Our Cisco rep just told us that pretty soon they are going to drop full layer 3 Nexus 5k, but it sounds like new hardware, though I will hope for a software upgrade.
 
Still got a little wire clean up to go, but over all making progress

IMAG0053.jpg


IMAG0050.jpg


This table is now full of phones by the way just didn't take a new picture of it

IMAG0047.jpg
 
I dig how the Shoretel gear is now two units in one U. What models are those?
 
darrenster said:
Is that a meeting room in a vault? Nice door there...
Click to expand...

The other way around.. Vault in the meeting room. I can't go into a lot of details, but lets just say I think it's every IT guys dream to have an on site vault to put your backups and important shit
 
NTAuthourity said:
Do you find the Dell switches are better for performance when it comes to Shoretel?
Click to expand...

I haven't had alot of time when the two to really notice anything performance wise (good or bad for that matter), but what I can say is right now I'm happy with it. There is no qos turned on and voice quality is pretty good.

What I can say without a doubt is the cost is right for them. I priced out a 3750 stack and for the cost of it I can upgrade every switch in my network to gig. Currently our core and server switches are gig and the rest of our network is 10/100. I'm currently running 6248p (POE) as my core switch and the rest of the switches are 3548p. I'm using the gig uplink ports on the 3548s to connect back to the core.
 
How is the quality of the ShoreTel end-points? I might be a little biased, but I've found that most end-points outside of Cisco IP Phones feel very cheap and dinky. I've used some Avaya IP phones and they were disgusting. The handset feels like a piece of plastic crap and the buttons feel like garbage.
 
PlusLabs said:
How is the quality of the ShoreTel end-points? I might be a little biased, but I've found that most end-points outside of Cisco IP Phones feel very cheap and dinky. I've used some Avaya IP phones and they were disgusting. The handset feels like a piece of plastic crap and the buttons feel like garbage.
Click to expand...

If by end-points you mean the phones themselves then they in my opinion are solid. They don't feel like they are going to fall apart. I might even go as saying I would feel comfortable knocking this phone off from my desk and not feeling guilty about it. Aside from the phone feeling solid, the speaker phone is incredibly clear, the handset is also incredibly clear and the buttons themselves seem solid as well.
 
archivalbackup said:
I really want to get some 7k's to replace our classic 6500, but it looks like we will only be getting a 6500E chassis so we can re-use our existing gig line cards.

The entire data center is going to live on the 5ks and fiber aggregation from the rest of the campus will go through the 6500. Our Cisco rep just told us that pretty soon they are going to drop full layer 3 Nexus 5k, but it sounds like new hardware, though I will hope for a software upgrade.
Click to expand...

That's cool. My understand was that the 5Ks would be strictly L2. Seemed kinda meh.

I can't take pics of our Nexus stuff, it's all in Chicago.:eek:
 
archivalbackup said:
. Our Cisco rep just told us that pretty soon they are going to drop full layer 3 Nexus 5k, but it sounds like new hardware, though I will hope for a software upgrade.
Click to expand...
Dont hold your breath on that one. Same thing with the 7k supporting FCIP, they dont want to kill any product lines(MDS specifically). Dumping L3 on the 5k was a good move. I like the fact that I have both the 5k and the 7k doing completely different functions(standard FC duties for the 5k, 7k is all L3 :)

archivalbackup said:
Could have been some sort of delay with Akami, weird.
Click to expand...
Weird? Akami's been sucking is the norm as of late! :p
 
Last edited:
archivalbackup said:
I really want to get some 7k's to replace our classic 6500, but it looks like we will only be getting a 6500E chassis so we can re-use our existing gig line cards.

The entire data center is going to live on the 5ks and fiber aggregation from the rest of the campus will go through the 6500. Our Cisco rep just told us that pretty soon they are going to drop full layer 3 Nexus 5k, but it sounds like new hardware, though I will hope for a software upgrade.
Click to expand...

Whatever you do, don't replace a 6500 sup720 with a 7K at the core. After 4.2-2a code came out, the 7K (finally) satisfied my confidence for agg, but can't hold a candle to the stability of the 6K when you do more complex stuff.

The 5010 is not a bad machine, I just didn't like how long it was compared to the arista 7148 (it literally stuck out of our idataplex rack), the fact that you had to burn another RU to get 48 ports, and the lack of ISSU. I haven't touched these boxes since I left my old job so maybe they put ISSU in now.
 
Fiiine. I have some updated pics to post. :p

New rack setup:

DSC01319s.jpg



My Infortrend SANs:

DSC01262s.jpg



Ran out of space on top of the rack, so I had to resort to using the living room for assembling 2 servers. Awful quality unfortunately as only my cell phone was available at the time.

20100910_002s.jpg



More Supermicro chassis and networking gear will be here next week, so I get to post even more pics. Going to have even more hot swap bays. :D
 
Blue Fox said:
20100910_002s.jpg



More Supermicro chassis and networking gear will be here next week, so I get to post even more pics. Going to have even more hot swap bays. :D
Click to expand...

the board that is still in it's static bag, looks like a intel server board ?
 
Was looking at that board, but Supermicro won that battle. Dedicated IPMI port and standard I/O layout helped.

I have one of these showing up next week. I don't even know what I'm going to do with it or why I bought it. :p Could be a fun project I guess?...maybe I'll dump it in colocation. Also have another Microsoft ISA server box on the way to put at a friend's place for VPN. http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/2U/216/SC216E1-R900LP.cfm
 
CaseyBlackburn said:
Another Celestix box? I put a little effort into getting this one: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300462753064 but ended up losing.
Click to expand...

They pop up every so often so keep looking. I may end up trying to score one for myself later on. But..... In the meantime Blue Fox's RSA box is currently at my house for testing. I'll probably end up buying it from him. Turns out it's a pretty sweet little inexpensive rig. and it's VERY quiet. (more quiet than my Dell Powerconnect switch) which is a plus for me. I may try to score a second one if i can find the right deal. Would definately come in handy as an Untangle or Astaro box. But the factory Server 2003, although they attempted to *hide* certain functions, are all there at first glance.

The Celestix box is more powerful and has more ports on it. But it's definately more power hungry and louder. And they tend to go for a little more money as a result. :(

Might want to contact Blue Fox to see if he can hook you up with one. He's got resources for everything it seems. I swing by his place every now and then. and yah, Ive got serious hardware envy :) although my Desktop PC is faster ;)
 
As an eBay Associate, HardForum may earn from qualifying purchases.
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top