Street View Photographs Your Naked Kids

NoOther said:
No? Then how about child pornography to post pictures up of naked minors? I am fairly certain that is against the law in most nations these days.
Click to expand...

Wow. So you think the human body should be illegal, huh? That's sad.

NoOther said:
I know someone who unintentionally received child pornography from a news distribution agent. He still was found guilty for having and distributing it since it ended up on the list, even though as soon as he discovered it, it was removed. It was never his intent to receive, store, or distribute such media, but it happened.
Click to expand...

If I'm understanding this correctly, that's wrong and awful and should never have happened. You should not have to register as a pedophile (i.e. end all hopes of living a normal life) because some douchebag sent you a picture and you didn't notice it right away.

Regardless, though, this Streetview picture is not child pornography.

Ashbringer said:
Then expect some guy from Pittsburgh called BOB, to be whacking off to photos of your kid.
Click to expand...

I will not let abstract concerns about the activites of a mentally ill person I will never meet interfere with my (or my kids') quality of life.

Child porn is terrible but there is a long list of things that won't solve that problem: banning Google from taking pictures from public streets when kids are outside is one of those.
 
So wait, let me get this straight - the kid was in public. In the areas that you are allowed to take photographs in and of because they are public. And people here/the mother are going apeshit over it?

These were not pictures in her fenced in backyard I would assume (I havent looked, but Google doesnt generally try to look through fences, so I assume the stupid woman has an unfenced front yard), so she is the ONLY person at fault here. google should turn around and file a suit for defamation or slander, since she is trying to shit all over them for something that is directly tied only to her!

And no, Google shouldnt scan every image and make sure its ok. They take pictures of PUBLIC property, or property that is imaged falls under the "You can see it from the street, you can take a picture" rule. They did nothing wrong (this time at least... I am certainly not saying they havent screwed the pooch quite brutally recently.. but not this time)
 
put clothes on him....at least in public. I have alot of little cousins and know they do shed em but seriously....front yard???
 
well if google is trying to take pics like these then its kiddy porn even if they scream no harm done lets get out of china and not really get out of china at all.
 
NoOther said:
No? Then how about child pornography to post pictures up of naked minors? I am fairly certain that is against the law in most nations these days.
Click to expand...

What is this, the 1800s? Since when is a mere incidental photograph that isn't sexual in nature "porn"?

I'm beginning to think that people that feel that way are complaining because it's personally arousing to them. :D

Google couldn't just take these on a case by case basis and do manual blurring, instead of people having conniption fits?
 
AdamNesvick said:
Do you all HAVE any kids?

Toddlers are IMPOSSIBLE to keep dressed. I can understand how the kid was naked in the front yard.

I just think shes a fucking idiot for complaining so loudly about the whole incident. ;)
Click to expand...

Whaaa? If this was even remotely true then this wouldn't be such a bid deal correct? If so we would all be used to toddlers runing around butt ass all day... :( I have 3 nephews and none of them as toddlers ran around outside naked and none of them dropped drawer in public lol...
 
RiZnO said:
Whaaa? If this was even remotely true then this wouldn't be such a bid deal correct? If so we would all be used to toddlers runing around butt ass all day... :( I have 3 nephews and none of them as toddlers ran around outside naked and none of them dropped drawer in public lol...
Click to expand...

Some kids do like to take their clothes off. :D Some feel better free. Some adults for that matter.
 
My neighbors have 2 little kids that have been running around for oh the past month or so butt ass nekkid. It's rather disturbing. Moreso for the fact that the parents are IDIOTS... The kids have learned to climb, and the parents are hardly ever outside. The nekkid kids go climb onto the trampoline (without safety covers on the springs! Bet that'd hurt if it caught some private parts...), and have started trying to set the ladder up next to the pool to climb up and get in. WTF is wrong with some parents?
 
Wait...

She lets her kid un naked in the front yard, and then gets pissed when his *privacy* is violated?

What privacy? You're in your front yard. Outside. No *privacy* fence.

Any asshole with a camera could have taken a picture, but because it's Google, people get dollar signs in their eyes.
 
Sherk said:
...The nekkid kids go climb onto the trampoline (without safety covers on the springs! ... started trying to set the ladder up next to the pool to climb up and get in. WTF is wrong with some parents?
Click to expand...

nothing is wrong with the parents.... it's the self cleansing abilities of the gene pool in action...
 
NoOther said:
No? Then how about child pornography to post pictures up of naked minors? I am fairly certain that is against the law in most nations these days.
Click to expand...

Innocent nudity isn't pornography. Google should alter or replace the photo (as they should for anyone that wishes to be removed), but they did nothing wrong. There is no expectation of privacy in public. Your front yard is public.

And kids running around naked aren't pornographic, even if you take a picture of one. Even if that picture is on the internet.
 
inerlogic said:
intent has nothing to do with it, see how often "i didn't intend to XXXX" gets you out of court....
in the US nudity does not equal pornography...... yet....
Click to expand...

That's a blanket statement. Google didn't tell the boy to come out of the house naked and then forgot to edit him out before posting it online. The guy was driving a car. He couldn't possibly notice every single thing that goes on around him while concentrating on the road in front of him.

As I said to another poster, unless you're Viacom, it's unfair to expect Google (and YouTube) to go through every single snapshots (and videos) to make sure it's clean. There's probably billions of photographs!

That was the non-intent I was trying to convey.
 
why the hell would you have your kid naked in the front yard?

fail parents are fail
 
No, no, no... you guys are missing the point: her kid was running around naked on private property, therefore any invasion of said property would be an invasion of privacy, regardless of how many strangers and passer-bys can also oggle the kid... or something like that. :rolleyes:
 
God I hate stupid parents. You can't let your fucking kid run around naked and get mad at someone when they see him :mad:
 
James54321 said:
No, no, no... you guys are missing the point: her kid was running around naked on private property, therefore any invasion of said property would be an invasion of privacy, regardless of how many strangers and passer-bys can also oggle the kid... or something like that. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

When I read this, for some reason an image of a cranky old guy sitting on a lawn chair in his yard appeared in my mind, with him screaming at everybody that passed by "This is private property! Stop staring at me or I'll call the cops! ARRRRRRRG!!" followed by flying empty beer containers. :D
 
I hate these parents that say it's impossible to keep a child's clothes on. If you can't keep them on your kids, you aren't hitting your kids enough.
 
krotch said:
I hate these parents that say it's impossible to keep a child's clothes on. If you can't keep them on your kids, you aren't hitting your kids enough.
Click to expand...

The reason an abusive parent demands their child keep fully clothed at all times is that it helps hide the bruises...
 
NoOther said:
Intent does not matter, all pictures should be reviewed before posting them ON THE INTERNET. If they had unintentionally taken the picture and then reviewed it and not posted it up, that would be fine. I know someone who unintentionally received child pornography from a news distribution agent. He still was found guilty for having and distributing it since it ended up on the list, even though as soon as he discovered it, it was removed. It was never his intent to receive, store, or distribute such media, but it happened.

Intention is not enough to acquit someone. Remember the path to hell is paved by good intentions.
Click to expand...
2 things

1) It's not child pornography, so your whole point is moot.

2) The path to hell isn't paved with anything. It doesn't exist.
 
Like a previously stated, some children/toddlers are impossible to keep clothed (used to babysit for extra cash), especially during the SUMMER TIME, geeez.
 
Again, you don't hit your kids enough. Hit them enough when they take off their clothes, they'll learn not to take them off.
 
James54321 said:
No, no, no... you guys are missing the point: her kid was running around naked on private property, therefore any invasion of said property would be an invasion of privacy, regardless of how many strangers and passer-bys can also oggle the kid... or something like that. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Not sure of the law in the UK but I do know in the US if it can be seen from Public Property you have no right to expect privacy.
 
The best part was that the second I saw the picture of her with her child I knew she was from the UK. Didn't even need to read the article to know. How messed up is it that white people in the UK look so distinctively different from white people everywhere else in the world?
 
arentol said:
The best part was that the second I saw the picture of her with her child I knew she was from the UK. Didn't even need to read the article to know. How messed up is it that white people in the UK look so distinctively different from white people everywhere else in the world?
Click to expand...

Umm...nothing new really. Americans look different from the Brits. Both look different from the French. All them look different from the Germans. Blah blah blah blah.

For some it's unnoticeable. Like how Asians can tell the difference between other Asians, while others just think we're all Chinese.
 
It is pretty hard to keep clothes on kids.

...But I still wouldnt let mine run outside without any.

...Then again, at the age of 3, I crawled out of a window on to the roof buttneked.

Do I care? No...would if the whole world knew..maybe, and Id be like, my ass looked like shit then and it still does. :D
 
I think this has nothing to do with outrage about her 3 year old son been naked on the internet and more about the mother seeing an opportunity to sue google and make a quick buck.

This is just my opinion of course.
 
All these attacks on Google's projects lately keep missing the point.

People should be thankful when something Google does exposes how exposed they are. Pedophiles in the internet? If they find the image, they were using streetview to look at that area. If they were doing that, it means they meant to take a trip around there. If they take a trip around there, even without the pictures they'd get to see the child naked anyway. Because they're letting him run naked on the front lawn.

Sue Google, but that won't change the fact that your child is naked on display because you can't manage to keep him clothed or inside. Stop worrying about what strangers across the globe might or might not find, and start worrying about what the people who will actually be going down the street can see.
 
ffs hes three, my 3 year old godson runs around in the buff all the time, but I live in New Zealand and not a country full of bloody pedos
 
Once, my brother undressed himself and ran down the street.
Once, my brother climbed the fence in our backyard and got out.

These both occurred when he was quite young, and I wouldn't be surprised if they both happened at the same time. To have that happen and a Google Street View vehicle come down your street at the same would be a major coincidence, but nothing more. I'm sure Google wouldn't mind censoring the picture, though.

p.s.: I never realized how silly the word street looks. o.o
 
lol, how long until he becomes a sex offender, because OMFG he could have saw his own dick...imagine the mental scars he'd have to live with knowing he has an evil appendage like that hanging off his pelvis...oh the fucking humanity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top