http://www.tweakpc.de/hardware/tests/cpu/intel_core_i7_970_benchmark_preview/s01.php
Yes, it's in German. I am not surprise by the numbers.
Yes, it's in German. I am not surprise by the numbers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I got one for $138.19 plus an $86.80 ($71.80AR) CFX/USB3/SATA3 motherboard a little over a week ago.I'll get a 6 core when they're around 500 bux retail.
...Maybe in 2012 I can get a 6 core chip to replace my 920.
cmon, just release this as a $500 part or make a 6core 3.06ghz @ $350 or something that would actually make people buy these.nice 6cores...
Seeing as it's a newer product, despite the fact that the processors are binned and all that, it could very well be that most of the 970s would clock better than the 980x's that have already been sold.That new i7 970 is definately something that will interest people who need the threads. When you consider that the Core i7 930's don't really overclock worse than the extreme edition 975x, I suspect that the upcoming 970 is going to overclock very well. We have a few folders for our team that are easily getting 4.2ghz out of their Gulftowns. Considering that the 970 will also be a 32nm cpu, it should do very well. I just hope that we get some very reasonably priced versions of the Gulftowns before LGA 1366 is abandoned by Intel next year, as i'd like to stretch out the life of my LGA 1366 folding rig some more. Gulftown is the first Intel processor that has truly impressed me(i'm an AMD fan), and it makes me excited to know that lower cost versions are on their way.
Seeing as it's a newer product, despite the fact that the processors are binned and all that, it could very well be that most of the 970s would clock better than the 980x's that have already been sold.
I will say this, if the i7 970 X6 processor ends up being priced at under $500, I have a feeling that I will be doing an impulse upgrade on my folding rig. I can't wait to see how well these new 32nm babies are going to overclock. I'm a conservative overclocker though, but it will still be exciting to see.
From what Ive seen from reviews, them being 32nm helps but the additional 2 cores (+50% more than quad) do not, so it sorta cancels out.
They're good OCers no doubt, but not a huge jump like what 45nm Wolfdale showed us versus 65nm Conroe.
Intel is missing a big enthusiast pie by not releasing 32nm quads with Nehalem.
Impressive horsepower, but the fact that it's still 130W is disappointing to me. As a broke upgradeaholic, I promised myself no upgrades if it means power consumption goes up. I suspect I'll be on my 65w s775 quad awhile.
Impressive horsepower, but the fact that it's still 130W is disappointing to me. As a broke upgradeaholic, I promised myself no upgrades if it means power consumption goes up. I suspect I'll be on my 65w s775 quad awhile.
If you are a serious folder, wouldn't your rather run multiple quad core based machines for the same price as a single quad?
I have lots of rendering to do this fall. Really looking forward to picking one up. Here's to hoping the price is right...