sohosources
n00b
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2006
- Messages
- 58
Hi, Gang,
Just built an i7-930 system with 12 GB of RAM on an ASUS Rampage II Gene MB. Easy and stable OC to 3.8 GHz with Hyper 212+ cooler.
This is my main productivity box (no REAL gaming), which presently runs XP Pro X64 as the host OS and a bunch of VMWare 7 VMs for various dedicated purposes.
I have been drooling over the HD performance anecdotes of modern SSDs...but have also been noticing that these buggers are kinda spendy and not exactly bug/gotcha free as of yet.
As a hassle-free step in the right direction I have been considering using a single 250GB Samsung F3 as my boot/OS drive (should provide at least 110 MB/sec according to reviews, etc, and using a pair of F3 250s in RAID 0 to house the working copies of my VMs and other temporary local storage (all work files are stored on a RAID 1 file server via gigabit LAN).
Two Sammy F3 250s in RAID 0 using ASUS MB software raid controller should get me to at least 150 MB/sec, which is a crap-ton faster than the single SATA I drive I'm now using, and ease the pain of NOT having an SSD.
These drives are way cheap, and I could even use 4 or them in RAID 0 if I thought such an array would be even remotely reliable and the speed would be usably faster than 150 MB/sec using the on-board RAID controller.
Am I on the right track here? Or is using an SSD on a non-Win7 platform (trim, garbage collection, etc) realistic TODAY.
This machine needs to be as fast as REASONABLY possible...without being twitchy, fussy and requiring lots of attention.
Thanks, as always,
--KK in MN
Just built an i7-930 system with 12 GB of RAM on an ASUS Rampage II Gene MB. Easy and stable OC to 3.8 GHz with Hyper 212+ cooler.
This is my main productivity box (no REAL gaming), which presently runs XP Pro X64 as the host OS and a bunch of VMWare 7 VMs for various dedicated purposes.
I have been drooling over the HD performance anecdotes of modern SSDs...but have also been noticing that these buggers are kinda spendy and not exactly bug/gotcha free as of yet.
As a hassle-free step in the right direction I have been considering using a single 250GB Samsung F3 as my boot/OS drive (should provide at least 110 MB/sec according to reviews, etc, and using a pair of F3 250s in RAID 0 to house the working copies of my VMs and other temporary local storage (all work files are stored on a RAID 1 file server via gigabit LAN).
Two Sammy F3 250s in RAID 0 using ASUS MB software raid controller should get me to at least 150 MB/sec, which is a crap-ton faster than the single SATA I drive I'm now using, and ease the pain of NOT having an SSD.
These drives are way cheap, and I could even use 4 or them in RAID 0 if I thought such an array would be even remotely reliable and the speed would be usably faster than 150 MB/sec using the on-board RAID controller.
Am I on the right track here? Or is using an SSD on a non-Win7 platform (trim, garbage collection, etc) realistic TODAY.
This machine needs to be as fast as REASONABLY possible...without being twitchy, fussy and requiring lots of attention.
Thanks, as always,
--KK in MN