Post your Unigine benchmark results

E

Eastcoasthandle

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
1,041
Download the benchmark here, Unigine v0.4
Post either a screen shot or write down your results
Either use:
1024x768, 1280x1024 or 1680x1050 fullscreen resolution
AA 4x
DX9
Shadows: shadow map hardware soft
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Anisotropy: 16x
Translucence: enabled
Parallax: enabled
Specular: enabled
Reflection: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Motion blur: enabled
Glow: enabled
DOF: enabled
HDR: enabled

If you would be so kind as to let us know your video card gpu/mem clocks?

Side Note: most of this information will be available in the screenshot.
Please set LOD at it's original default settings before benchmarking.
 
Ok, with a 7900GS @ 620/805 (1610 DDR), e6300 @ 2317, Memory @ 828 4-4-4-15.

In any event I like the look of the benchmark, nice to have something different than the 3DMark stuff I'm used to. Any particular reason you want benches run with it?

Resolution set to 1680x1050 with default settings, no fireballs. They seem to turn off when you start the benchmark and can't be turned on during it.

OpenGL 16x AF - FPS: 23.6 Scores: 501
D3D 16x AF - FPS: 28.2 Scores:598
OpenGL No AF - FPS: 26.0 Scores: 551
D3D No AF - FPS: 30.8 Scores: 653


Hardware
Operating system: Windows XP (build 2600, Service Pack 2) 32bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz
CPU flags: 2317MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 HT
GPU model: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS 6.14.10.9371 256Mb

Settings
Render: See chart above
Mode: 1680x1050 fullscreen
Shadows: shadow map hardware soft
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Anisotropy: See chart above
Translucence: enabled
Parallax: enabled
Specular: enabled
Reflection: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Motion blur: disabled
Glow: enabled
DOF: disabled
HDR: enabled
 
unibench_nox.jpg
 
I had steam, Firefox, msn mesenger, winamp and a few other things running when I ran the test.

basically 16801050 with everything max/on

AA and AF settings were set in the application so probably wasnt using CSAA, but looked very nice especially with fireballs wizzing around.


Unigine v0.4

Sanctuary demo
FPS: 23.9
Scores: 508

Hardware
Operating system: Windows Vista (build 6000) 64bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
CPU flags: 2995MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 HT
GPU model: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX 7.15.11.5845 768Mb

Settings
Render: opengl
Mode: 1680x1050 8xAA fullscreen
Shadows: shadow map hardware soft
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Anisotropy: 16x
Translucence: enabled
Parallax: enabled
Specular: enabled
Reflection: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Motion blur: enabled
Glow: enabled
DOF: enabled
HDR: enabled
 
What settings are you expecting from the benchmark? You can't turn on fireballs during it.
 
I had a hard time trying to put my monitor's native res... guess its just not possible (even tried changing the XML'd config file). Also changing from even 800x600 to lets say 1024x768 would cause my system to crash :eek:
So anyway I decided to give a go @ 1280x768 in windowed, since at fullscreen Im damned to use 1024x768...

BTW, yes, you cant use fireballs in benchmark mode so...

AA/AF settings were maxed out... I think anyway thats default.

4qqcoea.png
 
How do you use fireballs in benchmark mode? It seems like they give better performance than with them off.
 
Don't know why but everytime I try to change resolution it freezes up on me. Oh well, pretty neat looking demo.

unigine1.jpg
 
Asus P5K - Deluxe
E6320 @ 426MHz FSB / 3GHz
4x1GB 4-4-4-12 @ 856MHz
EVGA 8800GTS A2 @ 580 Core / 900 Memory

As OP requested, with 4xAA / Motion Blur / DOF enabled @ 1680x1050

unigine_580_900.JPG



As everyone else in this thread is doing: 0xAA / Motion Blur / DOF disabled (but still @ 1680x1050)

unigine_580_900_cheat.JPG
 
EVGA 650i Ultra
E4300 @ 350MHz FSB / 3.15GHz
2x1GB 4-4-3-5 @ 800MHz
EVGA 8800GTX @ 620 Core / 950 Memory

(more details in sig)

Uniginedemo2.jpg
 
4xAA at 1600x1200
untitled.jpg


mine was at 1600x1200 if that really matters much dont have a widescreen
no OC at all on my stuff

specs in sig


0xAA / Motion Blur disabled/ DOF disabled 1600x1200
untitled2.jpg
 
lol mine also locked up my pc when trying to go back from 1600x1200 to 1024x768 o well i got my benchmarks up
 
x2900xtwh9.jpg

Here is one in max detail at a higher res for comparison
x2900xthighdetailvt9.jpg

not bad for an old processor like mine!
 
Gilj said:
[IMG*]http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/739/x2900xtwh9.jpg[/IMG]
Oooh i beat the 8800's :d
Click to expand...

You're at 1024x768, holmes.

And you forgot to enable Motion Blur, DOF, HDR.



Asus P5K - Deluxe
E6320 @ 426MHz FSB / 3GHz
4x1GB 4-4-4-12 @ 856MHz
EVGA 8800GTS A2 @ 580 Core / 900 Memory


Edit#1 Here ya go - same settings w/ 8800GTS

unigine_580_900_mega_cheat.JPG




Edit#2 per gilj's request - everything high, 4xAA, 1280x1024

unigine_580_900_1280x1024.JPG



And no thanks on the trade! I just upgraded from a P4D ~2 weeks ago :)
 
edited! lets see you run it in 1280 at high detail mate, also can you lend me your core2duo ? :D
 
Looks as though the GTS and X2900 are nice and evenly matched here, although your FPS went wild at 1024 low detail, I wonder if that could be due to the processor or whether the GTS has higher framerates at lower res and slows down to x2900 speed at higher res and detail.

Time will tell, and more benchmarks - keep em comin!
 
Gilj said:
Looks as though the GTS and X2900 are nice and evenly matched here, although your FPS went wild at 1024 low detail, I wonder if that could be due to the processor or whether the GTS has higher framerates at lower res and slows down to x2900 speed at higher res and detail.

Time will tell, and more benchmarks - keep em comin!
Click to expand...

YEah - good comparison. As you get to higher resolutions, you become less CPU limited. I'm sure that's why my score is so much higher at 1024x768. You don't happen to have access to a widescreen monitor do you? As far as synthetic benchmarks, I like this one - it would be cool to compare our results at 1680x1050 and 1920x1600 to see if the difference completely disappears (since we definitely would be GPU limited at higher resolutions)
 
Sorry my monitor only supports upto 1280x1024, i'll let you know when I have my new 1080p TV :)

Regards,

Gilj
 
Benchmark doesn't like it when I change resolutions :(, crashes out, same when I try 8x AA.

1024x768 w/ 4x AA and everything else from the OP

main2007061217293307qt7.png


Where are your benchmarks EastCoast?
 
has anyone tried to use it with an SLi setup yet?

i can get SLi 8xAA to work wonderfully, of course, but none of the split/alternate frame rendering modes will give me my sweet come-uppins.

my results are not worth the time it would take to upload them to imageshack :p


edit- i'm bored and my computer is running really hot (40C, it's still 30C here in ontario and the sun is down) so now's as good a time as any to run through the difference between SLi 8xAA on/off. here's hoping that someone more gooder will chime in with an SLi solution for XP/93.71, cause i'm inclined to say she's a no go at this point. :D
 
Unigine v0.4
Sanctuary demo
FPS: 14.7
Scores: 311

Hardware
Operating system: Windows XP (build 2600, Service Pack 2) 32bit
CPU model: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3700+
CPU flags: 2211MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3
GPU model: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT 6.14.10.9424 256Mb

Settings
Render: opengl
Mode: 1440x900 fullscreen
Shadows: shadow map hardware soft
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Anisotropy: 16x
Translucence: enabled
Parallax: enabled
Specular: enabled
Reflection: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Motion blur: enabled
Glow: enabled
DOF: enabled
HDR: enabled

Unigine Corp. © 2005-2007
 
jmackay said:
Wow lost a ton of posts =\, SuperKeijo what did you score again?
Click to expand...

cpu ~3ghz (not 3,4 as unigine thinks) and 8800 gts 640 @ 594/1458/900:
click

same cpu, gpu @ 648/1620/1008 (fan auto, my 24/7 settings):
click

fan @ 100% 675/1674/1008 (still propably more quiet than the 2900 xt :D ):
click

eastcoasthandle's 2900xt doesn't stand a chance!! :p ;) :D :cool:
 
SuperKeijo said:
cpu ~3ghz (not 3,4 as unigine thinks) and 8800 gts 640 @ 594/1458/900:
click

same cpu, gpu @ 648/1620/1008 (fan auto, my 24/7 settings):
click

fan @ 100% 675/1674/1008 (still propably more quiet than the 2900 xt :D ):
click

eastcoasthandle's 2900xt doesn't stand a chance!! :p ;) :D :cool:
Click to expand...
:D
I have noticed that you guys are getting nice performance bumps with each new driver release. That's not bad at all. For me Cat 7.6 was just released. I have to see if there are any improvements. However, I am not seeing any performance gains in the release notes, only for CF in 2 games :(
 
Speaking of drivers... which ones are you nvidia lovaz using?
Because I see some rather weird version numbers up there (or anyway, I saw yesterday or saturday before the forum was down), and those are neither the official forcewares nor the betas (though only "official" betas I could find were from 2006!).

So are you using unofficial drivers? Which ones? :p
 
thedarklord said:
Speaking of drivers... which ones are you nvidia lovaz using?
Because I see some rather weird version numbers up there (or anyway, I saw yesterday or saturday before the forum was down), and those are neither the official forcewares nor the betas (though only "official" betas I could find were from 2006!).

So are you using unofficial drivers? Which ones? :p
Click to expand...
So, they are not official or beta drivers, interesting.
 
I was using official 158.22 WHQL drivers from nvidia.com and 160.03 for some.. not really a difference between the two, atleast in this benchmark.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top