nicepun
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
- Messages
- 2,208
Is it me or are prices for DDR2 going up? At least $100 more than before....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if people stopped buying RAM if they think that the price is too high, then they are going to back down again.wtburnette said:You're right, they're rising. Be nice if they go back down to what they were about a month or so ago...
drizzt81 said:if people stopped buying RAM if they think that the price is too high, then they are going to back down again.
I wasn't looking at you. I did not buy any either.wtburnette said:Don't look at me, I'm not buying any. If 2GB DDR2 falls under $200 again, I'll snatch some up. Until then forget it.
drizzt81 said:I wasn't looking at you. I did not buy any either.
(cf)Eclipse said:
blade52x said:If AMD is coming out with their own 65nm chip soon, and quad cores are coming out as well, how in the world are DDR2 prices going to drop?
With the current DDR2 prices, memory makers are likely to be able to increase production in order to make more profit...J-Mag said:Manufacturing costs/MB will continue to fall. Unfortunately supply:demand ratio is poor right now, but memory manufacturers aren't stupid and I am sure they are ramping up DDR2 produciton as they are phasing out DDR1.
yeah, I wish I had done that too. oh well, i am not going to move to conroe until the prices are back into normal regions.Rabid Badger said:Makes me glad I got my 2 GB of OCZ Titanium when I did. $158 after rebate. Now Platinum, which is a step below is almost $300. Wow.
drizzt81 said:With the current DDR2 prices, memory makers are likely to be able to increase production in order to make more profit...
Ok, long way:J-Mag said:Prices don't spur production increases, demand does. Price is a function of demand and production...
drizzt81 said:Ok, long way:
I assume that production has stayed constant for a while at P1, and demand has risen from D1 to D2, where D2 > D1, based on the increase in price. If there is a production amount P* that will allow a company to make more profit, assuming a constant demand D2, the company should produce amount P*.
A possible conclusion would be that demand must have been rising faster than supply in recent history. Also, one coule assume that the price elasticity of demand be rather low.J-Mag said:Your assumptions are wrong here, but the concepts between your "constant" variables are good.
Just doing a quick google search provides the following:
http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2005Jan/bch20050131028926.htm
http://www.physorg.com/preview11695.html
http://www.digitalmediaasia.com/default.asp?ArticleID=17817
Samsung in the above example has consistently been increasing DDR2 production this year.
Also, Demand is never constant and DDR2 demand has been rising consistently.
One could consider that the launch of the Core 2 duo, which may have been "highly anticipated" could account for a surge in demand for DDR2. If that is the case, the demand increase/ time unit was rather large, maybe unexpected. If this "jump" in demand was only a temporary effect and unexpected, prices could drop again in the near term.If AMD is coming out with their own 65nm chip soon, and quad cores are coming out as well, how in the world are DDR2 prices going to drop?
Unabomber said:RAM prices have always been volatile.
Many of you might not be old enough to remember this, but back in the early / mid 90's, a single megabyte of 60 or 70 ns DRAM cost around 40 bucks to the average Joe.
Then, in 1994, there was an explosion at an epoxy plant in Japan, that was responsible for a mere 1% of the world's supply. Every memory manufacturer then pretty much agreed to start gouging the customers, and in a matter of a few days, we were all hit by the news of "Oh no! Now we don't have enough epoxy to make our memory modules! We must raise prices!"
Soon after that, the price of that single 60 ns SIMM (yes, we used SIMM's in those days, not DIMM's) skyrocketed to 80 bucks per unit, even though the cost of making these modules really didn't increase at all.
In reality, the "plant explosion," combined with the increasing demands for memory, since Windows 3.11 was making everyone want at least 8 MB, and preferably 16 MB of memory, and that Windows NT was just starting to get a foothold, is what triggered this price increase.
Prices did come tumbling down, but that spike did last for a good while.
Dan_D said:When I started messing with computers, the standard was 4MB and the high end systems were upgraded to 8GB of ram.
fixed your M/G'sDan_D said:When I started messing with computers, the standard was 4MB and the high end systems were upgraded to 8GB of ram. When 8MB to 16MB was the standard I had to pay about $400 for 24MB of ram in three 8MB 72pin chips. This was before EDO DRAM came out BTW.
Dan_D said:When I started messing with computers, the standard was 4MB and the high end systems were upgraded to 8GB of ram. When 8GB to 16GB was the standard I had to pay about $400 for 24MB of ram in three 8MB 72pin chips. This was before EDO DRAM came out BTW.
Slider19 said:I wonder if PS3's launch will shift some focus back to the consoles and cool down RAM prices for PCs.