BigMacAttack
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2006
- Messages
- 1,563
ROFL! Way to go Eclipse! What a sweet oc.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
heh, sadly unlikely... maybe with some LN2 and some VERY good luck with cold bugsnoobtech said:I think you'll get about 4.0 Ghz now...
Hi Mark,
Thanks you very much for contacting MSI; your input is very important
to us.
For all suggestions below, we will discuss with our engineers and
implement it step by step onto future BIOS updates for the board.
Should you have any further question, please feel free to contact Robert
Nemecek, Technical Marketing Assistant, or me directly.
Once again, thanks for your time.
Best regards,
yeah, my k8n neo was kickass too.. once they got to bios 1.5 or so. clocked better than my dfi nf3-250gb at the same settings eventsuehpsyde said:I know my MSI K8N Neo Plat was a really nice board, hate to see the AM2 version go blah.
yeah, i have a feeling that most of the "issues" will be an easy fix. if anyone cares, i'm currently at 370mhz htt in windows, presumably with a bit of headroom too. i post a cpu validation of the max once i get therebassman said:I hope they get the issues resolved, too. It looks like a good board and it's less expensive than the Asus offerings.
mine worked just finetsuehpsyde said:
(cf)Eclipse said:edit: 391mhz. not quite 400, but defintly not bad
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=97566
i'll make sure it does with the next bios.. or my board does at leastGun_Strife said:to bad it wont boot at anything higher cause i was real excited about 391
keep it up man this is fun
do u think a bios update might change the 322 issue whenever they release a new one
(cf)Eclipse said:a bit faster
the 256kb cache doesn't help a whole lot though
any bench requests people want to see? keep in mind i've got a 7600gt and a single channel with 256mb for now, so preferably nothing really demanding on the ram's capacity
once i'm done getting the hang of this board really. the basic idea behind it all is exactly the same, just that the ram speed has gone from being ddr400 to ddr600 to ddr2-400 to ddr2-1200, and as a result, we have to use different memory ratios. other than that, it really is identicaltvdang7 said:when will we see eclipses overclock guide for am2? i dont quite understand all of this stuff/.
can do, give me a bit. need breakfast firstlw3d said:cinebench cpu render test
working fine for me now.. my host may have gone down for some reason during the nightScooter30 said:Pictures aren't loading for me.
won't have results till tonight, sorry. hanging out with the gf nowfuelvolts said:Well, its been 3 hours - what's new????
i think you're missing the fact that this is identical to what amd did with the ddr1 controller. look at what happens at ddr333. there are some cases where the 166mhz ram will be running at 157mhzWoWchamp said:AMD came up with something smart here: if a divider is produced that exceeds the next possible JEDEC-compliant standard memory clock (400, 533, 667, 800), the next lower divider is selected automatically."