Susquehannock said:Any PC gamer knows that Halo is nothing that great? You're funny.
Read the rest of the comments here, most people agree it wasn't that great...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Susquehannock said:Any PC gamer knows that Halo is nothing that great? You're funny.
Doward said:A couple of points I like about Halo.
You don't tote around a fucking WEAPONS CACHE WITH YOU. You have 1 gun in your hands, and you are able to holster another.
I like that EVERY enemy drops their weapons. Nothing as annoying as killing someone that's been firing at you, and the bad guy takes that weapon to hell with him.
MELEE ATTACK WITH ANY WEAPON.
Dual wielding single handed weapons.
As for the story, if you honestly dream up weirder shit than a COALITION of aliens with religious reverence to an ancient race (Forerunners) and their artifacts, come up against Humanity, who has figured out that the Forerunners actually have at least once wiped out ALL SENTIENT LIFE in the galaxy, and that this coalition of aliens is trying to fucking ACTIVATE THE GALAXY DESTROYING WEAPONRY THINKING IT IS A PATH TO HEAVEN...
then you need heavier doses of your meds, man. The story has a lot of depth, if you bother to look into it.
You are right. My mistake. Silly of me to question whether or not the posters in this threadCodeX said:Read the rest of the comments here, most people agree it wasn't that great...
Yes, that is true, but one could also say this:CodeX said:Halo did for consoles what HL1 and UT did for PC's, only like 10 years later...
Any PC gamer knows that Halo is nothing that great, on the PC it is a subpar FPS, and that is all. Non PC gamers don't know any better, since it was one of the first console FPS's
CodeX said:Read the rest of the comments here, most people agree it wasn't that great...
Doward said:As for the story, if you honestly dream up weirder shit than a COALITION of aliens with religious reverence to an ancient race (Forerunners) and their artifacts, come up against Humanity, who has figured out that the Forerunners actually have at least once wiped out ALL SENTIENT LIFE in the galaxy, and that this coalition of aliens is trying to fucking ACTIVATE THE GALAXY DESTROYING WEAPONRY THINKING IT IS A PATH TO HEAVEN...
then you need heavier doses of your meds, man. The story has a lot of depth, if you bother to look into it.
Psychotext said:For sure overhyped. But I'd still actually rate it as one of the most enjoyable games I've ever played (Both 1 and 2). I loved the story, the score was just top notch and I just got drawn in. I'm really glad that it's not going to be around until 2007. MS could have forced them to pull it out for the PS3 launch, and no doubt that would have ruined it. Of course, it's going to be under a huge amount of pressure for the final game anyway... I would not like to be in that team at bungie.
Would I have liked it so much if I was a twitch-click hyper FPS junky? Probably not, as it's not in the least bit hardcore. But then those days are gone for me cos I'm getting old.
^^^ - well saidSpaceman_Spiff said:Most people who took the time to post in a thread about halo being overhyped think its overhyped? Im shocked. Maybe the rest of us are just sick of hearing people whine about this. Does it really adversely affect you that much? This thread is basically flamebait.
Killdozer said:Yes, that is true, but one could also say this:
Halo did to consoles what Goldeneye already did almost 5 years before...but better...
tys90 said:I really really liked the story/gameplay in Halo 1....both dropped off in Halo 2 IMO. I guess gameplay changes had their ups and downs when compared to 1, some things weren't as good, some things were nice additions. For those reasons, I think Halo 2 was overhyped, Halo 1 matched the hype I guess you could say. It's hard for a sequel to not be overhyped though.
jubei said:HL2 had great story and graphics, the multiplayer was rather sub-par.
Presto88 said:Please tell me that I'm not the only one who thinks halo is a standard shooter?
flame away if you want but it wont affect my opinion
Kahnvex said:No more overhyped than your standard big-name PC FPS sequels of today and yesteryear. Doom 3, Quake 4, FEAR, Half Life 2. All of those were genuinely overhyped as well, but that doesn't stop them from being special and fun in their own unique ways.
So yes, Halo is overhyped, but the only people who see that as a negative thing are the folks who want to find something to nitpick, or who generally have an agenda about Console shooters, or the sales numbers Halo put up as a franchise. Those 2 comments usually go hand in hand with threads like these.
Complaining about something being overhyped, especially in an industry like this where the entire press is plugged in 24/7 and reports every tidbits of news, is like riding a merry-go-round.
K600 said:Completely agree here.
On top of that, most of the people who are complaining didn't play it when it first came out back in 2001. They all went back and judged a game from 2001 with a 2003+ perspective and that just doesn't end well with most FPS titles (Even when they're excellent).
It's sad that PC elitists actually threatened as if a good FPS on consoles is going to hurt them personally.
Halo was rarely touted as "revolutionary" by most reviewers. "Evolutionary" was used often and it is an apt description; Halo took a lot of things that already existed and combined them seamlessly.
I also picked up halo PC and enjoyed it in 2004. Overhype or not, its a good game. Never played Halo 2 (no xbox, just PS2), but now that I have an xbox360 I will probably check out halo 2 and ninja gaiden/black. BTW xbox360 is an awesome system.sculelos said:Hey I played halo in 2004 and enjoyed it quite a bit (on the pc), although it was the first FPS since I bought my now old computer. (XP3200, 1GB, 6800GT)
I would of played threw Halo 2 if it came out for pc but it hasn't and I don't feel like buying an xbox to play it.
tfbit said:I think any shooter, where you are aiming with a stick, is overhyped.
jubei said:Except goldeneye didn't have melee attacks,
prtzlboy said:Halo was the flagship game for the Xbox, and it had a long development that switched platforms (even was briefly a Mac title) a few times until Microsoft acquired Bungie. Microsoft said "Make this game look l33t for our console" and Bungie said "ok".
So they made it, and it was pretty nifty. It managed to have outdoor environments and vehicles for multiplayer which, to console gamers, obviously fucking blew their minds, and some of them still haven't recovered.
PC gamers were like "ok lets see what all this is about" and were not impressed by the repetative level design which was so bad that it really overshadowed the good parts of the game. And the vehicles? Meh Tribes did it better :/
So in summation as a console FPS the original Halo gets like a 9.5/10 because for consoles, it was obviously a cut way above the rest. For PC it gets like 7.5/10. Decent story, some pretty nice outdoor levels and good enemy AI, but horribly designed indoor portions that drag on and on and on, plus nothing really that innovative in the multiplayer.
Best console fps ever? Probably. The bar wasn't set very high there, though
ZOMG BEST GAEM EVAR? Uhhhh, no.
And thus ends my response to the flamebait
Spaceman_Spiff said:This is exactly why this thread is pointless. Pc gamers dont care about the game, they only care thats its basically a console shooter.
No one can think the game is over-hyped...
mr.dearthian said:Not entirely true. Didn't you ever play multiplayer and change the weapons for the match to, "Slappers Only?" Granted that it wasn't very effective, but was amusing for a few seconds.
Mr.Dearthian