Post your 3dMark 2005 scores here. (Link to list in 1st post)

Update on my 1900XTX score, hope it's in time. :)
13237.jpg
 
gjwild said:
Update on my 1900XTX score, hope it's in time. :)
Click to expand...

Yes you are the last score to be put on this posting of the list.
I am going to go do what I do so that I can post the list now...
BTW, your memory is at 963mhz aka 1,926mhz. WOW!
Your memory speed is almost at 2 freakin gigs!
Maybe you can get 37 more mhz out of it if you decrease the core speed!
Or you could paint the memory chips red, becuase red goes faster.
 
mentok1982 said:
BTW, your memory is at 963mhz aka 1,926mhz. WOW!
Your memory speed is almost at 2 freakin gigs!
Maybe you can get 37 more mhz out of it if you decrease the core speed!
Or you could paint the memory chips red, becuase red goes faster.
Click to expand...
Good idea, I have a can of red spray paint in the garage. :D
 
Look what I did for you guys!
I am now incorporating the CPU score, CPU type, CPU speed and memory amount and speed in to the list!
I am working backwards through our thread gathering the CPU and memory info and I will continue to do so.

Also I added average core and memory speeds for the X1800 XL.

The new color code is:
Orange: Cross Fire Scores
Maroon: X1800 Family
Pink: X1900 Family
Green: 6800 GS Scores
Bright Green Black Background: 7800 GS Scores
Blue: SLI Scores
Red: Last non-colored score entered
 
Mine seems to be wrong though. Well, maybe I made a ~7K in a previous attempt, but, I don't think I did, and if I did, it was unstable. I was pretty happy just to see the 6.9K (exactly 6900) I just recently got with those 6.1 drivers. I definitely don't have the video card memory at 616MHz. It freaks out if I try overclocking it by 3 MHz even. At this point, I got the 6900 score while running at a nice stable core speed of 570.34 and mem speed at 587.25 which is basically stock since it won't really handle being oced enough to make a difference. The 616 was what ATI's rather stupid autodetector very incorrectly assumed my memory could handle (I say stupid because my system will crash if I oc to 596 and try to actually RUN anything, and artifacts with occasional lockups at 594 or so.) 570/587 is 100% stable on this card even with the stock cooler, so the benchmark is definitely completely valid. Actually, by all rights, my memory should do a LOT better than this, and I can't help but think it's a sign that ATI's quality control system is just a little lacking since it's supposed to handle a little bit just in case.

BTW, I do actually list the CPU speed in my signature, just I list it by showing what FSB I'm using and what multiplier due to the tricky relationship between the FSB, memory, and HyperTransport. Anyway, simply put, my CPU is running at 2.52GHz, which is just about the limit of it's stability. It starts producing very subtle errors that only show up in Prime95 around 2.55 or so (must be Prime95 stable for me to be comfortable with it.) Probably any changes I make to my motherboard (probably switching to a Neo2 Platinum soon) I'll still have the CPU at or very close to the same speed. I like the fact that I can encode DVD videos for my portable player at just about realtime (even slightly faster in some cases) so I plan to not compromise much on CPU speed and create a CPU limiter if things change, so it's definitely alright to consider it to be a somewhat permanent number until I next upgrade -- which will be a while and you can just assume it's around that area if not certain. Oh, and my memory is currently at 210MHz (DDR420,) though that IS subject to change in the near future if I can help it (planning to get a DDR-booster to go with that Neo2 and take this UTT CH5 up to around 250 or so.)


Anyway, other than you accidentally making my system look better than it is (gee, darn d-: ) the new layout with color coding to make it easier to spot things is really nice. If you get bored in the future, one thing that might be interesting might be to show a link to the effects of CPU speed on 3DMark score. Eg, show people with similar cards but different CPU/speeds and compare their scores or something. Might make it easier to see where the worst effects of CPU limitations kick in and where it starts to make practically no difference (for example, those 3.2GHz Athlon 64s are amazing, but, honestly, you're not going to get too many more points versus, say, someone with a 2.8.) This is referring to the normal score of course, obviously the CPU score is higher if it performs better, but, that's not very useful. I'd say just show the list of CPU scores versus the normal scores, but, I don't think many people have given their CPU scores, so the list may not be populated enough to be useful. Well, anyway, if it sounds interesting, play around with the idea and decide for yourself what you like best obviously.
 
Holy crap :eek:, well done mentok, that is absolutely fantastic work there :D. Good to see I hit 260 with a laptop :cool:.
 
Updated score: 8361

7800GT @ 510/1230 ; AMD64 Venice 3000+ @ 2.7 GHz ; 1GB Corsair XMS DDR490 ; Driver: 83.10

3Dmark058361.jpg


I really need dual core . . .
 
Good gosh the clocks you have on that FX-60 is amazing! :eek: Good job centvalny.
I bet that bad boy is something to see.. :) Just plain awesome!
 
Here's my new entry.

X1900 Crossfire (X1900XTX + X1900CF)
OC'd to 690/800 in CCC, but not sure what card is actually being OC'd, damn CCC!

3DMark Score: 14466

Relevant info:
6.1 beta CATs (from CD)
AMD X2 4400 @ 2.64Ghz stock cooler
2 x 1Gb Ballistix PC4000 @ 240Mhz, 2-2-2-7 1T
DFI RDX200

Looking to break the 15K soon with added water ;)
 
gjwild said:
That's one sweet setup you got there Mysterae, good luck on the 15K. :)
Click to expand...

Thanks gjwild, if you want to know more about it, follow my project parallel HEX. I should have an update to it in the next few days, if I can stop playing X3!
 
Any scores from that new 7800 GS AGP yet?
We actaully got a few in stock yesterday at my Best Buy.
 
if your into diggin mentok.. i seen some on the forums from a few weeks ago.. leaked really.. if you even qualify them as real....
 
mentok1982 said:
Any scores from that new 7800 GS AGP yet?
We actaully got a few in stock yesterday at my Best Buy.
Click to expand...
You mean GT, right? Anyway, I noticed that my stock X850XT-PE AGP score was practically the same as a stock X850XT-PE PCI-E score. The differences were actually within the range of what one could expect due to the normal variance. From what I know of the 7800 (and X1000+) cards, they still can't TRULY take advantage of the differences of PCI-Express versus AGP, which isn't so surprising when one considers that even the X850XT-PE -- the fastest AGP card on the market -- can't take full advantage of AGP 8x versus AGP 4x. Well, I suppose the score could be just a tad lower due to maybe a very very tiny latency introduced by the translations to/from the bridge, but, I'd bet the differece between the AGP and PCI-E versions will be minimal in a good system.

Someone can feel free to send me a free 7800GT PCI-E and I'll GLADLY test this theory for you. I'll do a very very thorough test even. Not just synthetic benchmarks, but, lots of real world gaming. ^_^
 
gjwild that card of your is just sick man. Must be the golden sample of x1900xtx cards. You on air still? Got to be on water at least...
 
plywood99 said:
gjwild that card of your is just sick man. Must be the golden sample of x1900xtx cards. You on air still? Got to be on water at least...
Click to expand...

Stock cooler and still air.. :) This $240 processor is killing me though! :)
Ambient room temp is: Farenheit 50 | Celsius 10, not that cold but it helps.
This XTX really is a good one, thanks..
 
Woo Hoo!! new Score!!!

9600 3dMarks
With my X1800XL @ 670/733
AMD 3500+ @ 2.7Ghz
2GB OCZ EB Plat Ram @ 540mhz
 
hey i got 2110 on a x600Pro mentok with my new Board.. ( barrowing the card from a friend...)

dont have a comparison link.. not that you want to see it.. lol

530/340
not a bad overclocker

on cat 6.1
 
I just replaced the stock cooling on my 7800's with zalman zf700's. Amazing difference in temps. I.m gonna try it again in a few days.
 
awesome.. im sure you can get a better OC now.... youll definitly hit 13k...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top