What are you QMD guys doing?

I

ICE_9

2[H]4U
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
3,459
I has been over a week now without QMDs and I was wondering how you guys are dealing with running normal WU once again? I went through and changed the QMD boxen to 1 BigWU and one timeless. Is that the way to go or is their any other suggestions?
 
I've just let them fold on with the same settings. I'm not all that concerned about it. :)

 
I've been rolling with the punches as well, just let em run, and thrash on what they may. Right now, I'm looking at 689pts, 510pts, and 495pts respectively on part of my QMD'ers. Double Gromacs, chewing away. :D

 
atm ive got alot of the gbgromacs on the few boxes I used to qmd.

Other than one who is still gettin little dinky 40 pointers


 
I'm trying different things... My linux boxes that were running QMD's using wine I converted back to linux clients, my windows boxes are a mix of settings, so far none has proved particularly advantageous over another, although I'd like a few more of those big double gromacs WU that p[H]ant0m is getting :)

RPhArrow --\\\-------------------->

edit P.S. p[H]ant0m, what flags do you have set on those clients ?
 
Mine aren't running anything special, just -advmethods and big WU. Your typical run of the mill QMD grabbing setup. The first few days out of the shoot without QMD, I was picking up a ton of the 188 DGromacs that chugged along, but after a few days these started down the pipe.

 
Haven't touched a thing, just going with the flow.

The "flow" so far was a glut of 188 point GBGromacs pipe clogs at first. Today, all three Intel borgs are crunching away on DBGromacs of the 510-686 point range.

 
Seems the concencus (sp?) is to just leave it set. I did the same, thinking that this way I won't have to change things if/when they decide to bring back the QMDs.
 
I tried to change mine to un advmethods cause I was getting thoe gbgromacs which are retarded work units :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top