Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
pagoon said:I hope you all know doom 3 was made for the engine and not necessarily the game?
tranCendenZ said:see for me now I thought farcry was a good tech demo but a mediocre gameplay experience
i'd say for myself:
graphics:
doom3 (fantastic lighting, realism factor, atmosphere) > farcry (HDR) > hl2 (textures)
all three great though
fun:
doom3 (run'n gun in the dark, 4 player multi) > hl2 (gravity gun, vehicles) > farcry (sorta ok)
MechWarrior said:AvP as the marine was just so friggin scary I still have trouble playing it even in the day with friends. My pulse races so damn much.
pagoon said:They will make more money selling the engine for other games rather than Doom 3 itself. Doom 3 was to show off the engine. Q4, RTCW2, and possibly UT2k5 will all be running the new engine.
Sir-Fragalot said:Unreal is always done with the Unreal Engine. There will be no UT2005. The next UT will be Unreal Tournament 2007. Which will be using the Unreal 3.0 engine.
The engine has alot of potential. While the engine was a primary concern, I don't think they set out to make a mediocre game. I just think ID's out of ideas. So they have to rehash everything they've done in the past.
Castle Wolfenstien Doom, and Quake, maybe were the only original ideas they ever had. Maybe Quake 3 was their own. Not sure if Unreal Tournament was conceptualized first or second. Everything they've done has been a rehash of those ideas and those were all done 6 years ago or more.
Sir-Fragalot said:I agree with you. Also, the expansion pack was pretty good.
So while its not my favorite FPS ever, its not exactly the worst either. Not by a long shot. I can think of far worse.
Sin, plus some off beat Unreal Engine 1.0 FPS's that I got from Comp USA's bargain bin are way worse. Hitman Contracts was worse than Doom 3. I loved the second one. Couldn't get into Contracts at all.
DamienThorn said:I think that Sin shone when you played it in multiplayer - the level that took place in a toyroom and all the avatars were really tiny was a ton of fun.
I think that D3 was one of the best games that I've played in the past year or two, but having played it through a second time on my current rig, which is a hell of a lot more powerful than my past one, I've come to the conclusion that to get the full experience you really have to have a good computer. Sure, the game will run on a really low powered PC, but you don't get the same experience. Upping the detail levels, pumping the sound, and playing in the heart of the night really made the game special.
Techx said:You're a certified noob if you can honestly say doom3 is the WORST game ever. I mean really, the graphics were ground breaking (for last year anyway) even though it's too damn dark, the parts that aren't look great. Yeah the story wasn't all that, but really.. who the hell played the original doom for a story?! Noone.. for being a mindless shooter with eye candy it served its purpose well. Not the best game in history but far far from the worst.
MechWarrior said:AvP as the marine was just so friggin scary I still have trouble playing it even in the day with friends. My pulse races so damn much.
Sir-Fragalot said:I completely agree.
I agree with this.
I'm the Dude said:Yep. There's a huge correlation with people digging the game and having some pretty sweet hardware. I wish everyone could play it at 1600x1200 max details on a 20 inch LCD. Then they'd really experience it. I got a ton of play time with the game. In fact, the whole month of August I believe. No other single player game has given me that much.