![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
joecuddles said:
) and then with a Vapo early next year.....and then once I find that max FSB I'm gonna start looking at new ram. I might have to shell out more then I'd like, but with my MAX3 fully voltmodded and /w possibly another DDR Booster I'll most likely end up looking for something to do 277fsb 1:1.....if the Vapo proves to benefit me as much as I'd like. With enough voltage it still SHOULD be a possibility to get some BH5 running at 277 1:1 2-2-2-5 or relatively close to those timings.....but I might just move up to some PC4200EL OCZ or something....we'll have to see. KillerB said:
JoeBoomz said:Hey Elms, I heard about your new rig, looks like you found a use for that Vapochill again, hey? Congrats on the killer time!
mike.elmes said:Hey Joe...I have the Vapokill doing mundane stuff and the Prometeia hooked up to the new Hammer. I am feeding it a ton of voltage too and it does 3dmark at 271 x 12=3252 , I did have to cut it back to 268 x 12 to get it to do a 32m Superpi though. Maybe on a good day with all the Voltage I can muster she'll do a 32m Superpi at the 3.252ghz.
I am having a tough time getting the core over 525 but the memory on that Sapphire is the 1.6ns Samsung and it does 585 or higher without artifacts. The core seems to lock up at anything over 525.cornelious0_0 said:Hehe, there ya go.
EDIT: Now what kind of clocks are you hitting with that XT of yours.....I'm surprised we haven't seen you around the [H]ard ORB and ARC...what with that 3.2GHz FX-55 and all.
I'm thinking pencil trick some added voltage and change out the h/s for a pelt,if I want to void the warranty.
mike.elmes said:I am having a tough time getting the core over 525 but the memory on that Sapphire is the 1.6ns Samsung and it does 585 or higher without artifacts. The core seems to lock up at anything over 525.
Right now I have some 2001 3dmark scores of 34,600 and 2003 scores of 14,000 but need some better clocks on the core to go anywhere.
BaNaNaS said:
Dj_ said:Here you are corn, just 5 seconds of you now, going for a higher oc tonite, 2nd place will be mine, lol
, I have managed to drop my ram timings from 4/4/4/12 to 4/3/3/8 but it hasnt made any difference. Looks like your 2nd place is safe, well at least until I save up for a phasechange, might be able to persuade it to do a bit more with one of those sorting it out spin02 said:
cornelious0_0 said:
I mean, it's no 23 minutes, but he's still beating an FX-55 at 2.86 GHz. Must be some pretty sweet RAM. What a good time.JoeBoomz said:Kinda fun putting FX CPU's to shame. MAD props to Luciferin for what he pulled off with a $150 CPU.
I thought the whole point of 2 top-10 lists was because of the Prescott-specific version of SuperPi?cornelious0_0 said:Alright you guys, I DO fully realise that there's a "patched" version of SuperPi out there, but I do still want to leave the thread going.
Obviously I have no way of confirming anything, but if everyone could use the "version" of SuperPi I've linked to on the front page we SHOULD still be ok.....because I'm almost positive that it's the older version.
I fully realise that there are probably going to be ppl opposed to leaving this thread open, but I want to give you guys a chance to compare your own systems to those around you, and at the very least have a little fun.
Again, thx for the support, and the thread will stay open as long as I can maintain all three Top10 threads at once.
EDIT: Oh...and mike.....that 23m 01s score of yours isn't really your score you know.....you can't see the last, 25th reading it gave you. Sorry, but ya gotta re-run it.
It is actually free for all bench. Some use air and some with phase changer, and both can't be compare. The most important is how stable ones system with +/- 30 minutes run and 100% cpu utilization. Not only speed...uclajd said:I thought the whole point of 2 top-10 lists was because of the Prescott-specific version of SuperPi?
I don't want to turn this into some Intel v. AMD flamewar, but I thought the point was which system can compute 32M of pi faster.
You know, the AMD'ers could always run the patched version too.
cornelious0_0 said:True, it is fun....but I wouldn't call much of this putting anyone to shame....as there's a LOT that goes into some of these times beyond straight clocks, and even though the CPU clock is going to be the most detremental component to these scores, some FX setups might be either lacking in other areas....or may not be tweaked very well.
For isntance Joe, I can't tell from your pic if you're in your main XP partition/install.....but I have a seperate 5GB Partition on my hard drive that I have completely stripped down and tweaked out for running benchmarks...and it does effect scores/times like these a fair bit.
And that's only the start of the fun.
