Recent content by tigger1612

Such a shame TVs are still so much further ahead of monitors. Finally get QDOLED/WOLED monitors only to have 1/3 of the HDR brightness of what we all know the panel tech itself could do. If they made this even 10” smaller…8k res, 2400nits in 10% window. I’d be all over it. There is still this...

My 77 A95L will be here this week just before the bowl. Going from a 77 C9. Have a couple S95B qdoleds. Use a 55 as my monitor and 65 in bedroom. I can’t go back to WOLED and didn’t want to give up Dolby vision so that leaves one very expensive option.

As someone who goes to work everyday to provide for my family I see nothing wrong here from their financial perspective. If there is an issue with their performance then that should come out every year at review time.

Unfortunately because this makes too much sense we will get TVs that are too big at a great price and monitors that are too small at a terrible price.

I love my S95B to death for picture but it isnt without a fight. Samsung firmware is straight trashcan on the s95b. My previous C1 shit on it in terms of ability to be calibrated. While i calibrated my s95b, the CMS is junk and prior to firmware 13xx was absolutely broken. I mean as in did...

I hope this screen dethrones the "tv" displays but i highly doubt it. I'm also on a calibrated s95b and its just....different in a good way especially for the price. The monitor prices are still whacked and some company is just going to have to eat it and cannibalize their own products to make...

Asking $800 shipped. Comes with EK block already mounted on it as well as original box and accessories complete with stock heatsink. My ebay is towerofpower22. Thanks for looking.

LG 48 C1 KEF LS50W Chord Hugo 2 + Focal Stellia headphones Custom Bodybilt chair Uplift desk

Nope was the newest predator 240hz model about 3 months ago the one with .5ms bs. I notice no input difference in oled vs. The 240 but maybe im not good enough to notice. What i do notice is that the oled shits on a 1080p tn panel in every measurable way possible except the actual refresh rate...

I have a 55 c9 oled and had a predator 240hz 24 tn. The oled even at 1440 120 just destroys it. Besides the tn looking god awful, oled pixel response makes 120 on the oled look so much quicker. Motion resolution is on another level which adds a lot to the smoothness of what you are seeing...

I got my 55 on rakuten from iElectrica for 1199. Free shipping no tax. Took 2 weeks to actually get it but it was new and no issues. LG warranties no matter where you buy it. Ill try to get screenshots with no scaling. I had it working in BL3 with black bars all around.

My post mentions doing it 1:1 filling the screen. That is impossible. Oled is fixed pixel so there is only one 1:1 resolution that fills the screen, 3840x2160. Any other resolution is scaled to fill. If u turn off gpu scaling u can output 2560x1440 with black bars all around the image.

Please just have hdmi 2.1. Id sell my 2080ti just to get that.

Couple things for those getting one: 1. When in pc mode on hdmi port, SDR content is rgb full so black level setting on picture mode should be set to high. 2. When HDR is enabled it will switch to rgb/ycbcr limited so change black level to low or image will be washed out. 3. 2560x1440...

I have not. I cant get 10bit color depth at 2560x1440 120hz either. It greys out changing color depth even with hdr enabled. Looks like it may have to do with using a pc resolution. Can't change it even at 4k either unless i change to YCbCr422 or 420